Page 1 of 2 [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

29 Apr 2009, 1:24 pm

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2009/04/crist-dont-like-jesus-plate-dont-buy-it.html

I'm aghast, to be honest... though I liked one of the comments giving example of other ways that philosophy can be applied.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


cognito
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

29 Apr 2009, 2:06 pm

okay, following the surprme courts all or nothing clause, I move to have a pentagram (Wicca) license plate, the pentacle (Church of Satan) license plate and a crescent (Muslim) license plate!


_________________
I am a freak, want to hold my leash?


Henriksson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Nov 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,534
Location: Sweden

29 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm

1. Jesus is depicted on a license plate.
2. If you don't like, don't buy it.
3. People buy it.
4. Therefore, they like it.
5. Therefore, God exists.


_________________
"Purity is for drinking water, not people" - Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.


hester386
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 25 Dec 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 294

29 Apr 2009, 2:16 pm

Henriksson wrote:
1. Jesus is depicted on a license plate.
2. If you don't like, don't buy it.
3. People buy it.
4. Therefore, they like it.
5. Therefore, God exists.


Flawless! :lol: :lmao:



CanyonWind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Age: 73
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,656
Location: West of the Great Divide

29 Apr 2009, 2:58 pm

I'm imagining Jesus driving around with his picture on his license plate.


_________________
They murdered boys in Mississippi. They shot Medgar in the back.
Did you say that wasn't proper? Did you march out on the track?
You were quiet, just like mice. And now you say that we're not nice.
Well thank you buddy for your advice...
-Malvina


Bluestocking
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 245

29 Apr 2009, 3:33 pm

Can I get one with an Olmec head?



Dussel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,788
Location: London (UK)

29 Apr 2009, 4:32 pm

I am wondering would a licence plate with Bacchus be protected or would be seen as a promotion of drink-driving? An what a licence plate with Zeus and Ganymede? Religion or promotion of paedophilia?

---

Think those idea through let suggest that neutral plates with just a string of numbers may be the best idea.



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

29 Apr 2009, 4:50 pm

Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


Master_Pedant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,903

29 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm

Orwell wrote:
Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


Because, at least from how I interpreted the article, it seems that the state is issuing the plates.

If the state decides to sponser Jesus plates than they better follow cognito's proposal and allow similar luxuries for Muslims, Wiccans, Hindus, atheists ... ad infinitium.

As for the "In God We Trust", the US ought to look into overturning that vestige of dark days of McCarthyism.



makuranososhi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2008
Age: 48
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,805
Location: Banned by Alex

29 Apr 2009, 8:38 pm

Orwell wrote:
Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


Without provision for other faiths, it amounts to state support... and my interpretation was the same, that these are state issued plates.


M.


_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.

For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!


ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

29 Apr 2009, 8:53 pm

Bluestocking wrote:
Can I get one with an Olmec head?


Ask, and you shall receive...

Image



Awesomelyglorious
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,157
Location: Omnipresent

29 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm

Master_Pedant wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


Because, at least from how I interpreted the article, it seems that the state is issuing the plates.

If the state decides to sponser Jesus plates than they better follow cognito's proposal and allow similar luxuries for Muslims, Wiccans, Hindus, atheists ... ad infinitium.

As for the "In God We Trust", the US ought to look into overturning that vestige of dark days of McCarthyism.

See Orwell, don't you now wish that we abolished the government and got rid of this mess! :P



Bluestocking
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 245

29 Apr 2009, 9:19 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
Bluestocking wrote:
Can I get one with an Olmec head?


Ask, and you shall receive...

Image

Excellent! It's beautiful! 8O



Orwell
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Aug 2007
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,518
Location: Room 101

29 Apr 2009, 9:39 pm

makuranososhi wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


Without provision for other faiths, it amounts to state support... and my interpretation was the same, that these are state issued plates.


M.

Yes, state issued, but license plates are a rather trivial thing, and I believe states often offer license plates themed for a particular organization or cause without people assuming the government automatically endorses that organization or cause. I think the range of license plate options is most likely driven by requests for a certain type of license plate. So, don't be surprised that there are no Baha'i license plates. It's not really state support of a religion. Florida could probably find enough demand to provide Star of David license plates, though, given the massive Jewish population of South Florida.

Also, the whole "separation of church and state" thing (a phrase never found in the Constitution) seems often to be misinterpreted badly. It's getting to the point where any public profession of faith by someone connected to the government is now criticized as state endorsement, even when it clearly is not. In the US, people are free to follow any faith (or no faith) as their own conscience dictates. Providing a certain license plate style because a lot of people want it is a far cry away from having a state religion- and remember, in the fairly recent past Bible study was a mandatory part of public school curriculum, nowadays teachers can barely even mention religion without fearing reprisal. Our secular society is in no danger from a freaking license plate.


_________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH


monty
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Sep 2007
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,741

29 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm

I live in Florida. There are gobs of 'affinity plates' - if one group is allowed to create their own plate, all others should. But the system does not work that way.

A certain number of signatures on a petition are needed to be considered. And the process of creating a new plate requires a telephone survey to determine how many people are supportive. Then the legislature votes on it. Minority religious groups could easily be locked out if a large percent of the local yokels don't like that particular religion and say 'no' in the survey. And I doubt that good ole boys under the big dome in Tallahassee that have championed fundamentalist Christian plates will be equally supportive of smaller, less politically correct religions.

Yes, the state may be flirting with establishing a religion - consider the text for the law that created the Florida "Trust God" plate, where government creates and distributes an official product with a specific religious meaning, and then gives the money to a particular organization that has it's own philanthropic and religious agenda.

Quote:
320.08058(67)

The “In God We Trust” license plate is created. An annual use fee of $25 shall be collected and distributed to the In God We Trust Foundation, Inc., to fund educational scholarships for the children of Florida residents who are members of the United States Armed Forces, The National Guard, and the United States Armed Forces Reserves and for the children of public safety employees who have died in the line of duty who are not covered by existing state law. Funds shall also be distributed to other 501(c)(3) organizations that may apply for grants and scholarships and to provide educational grants to public and private schools to promote the historical and religious significance of American and Florida history.


There is another affinity plate called "I Believe" - here is what the cached version of their homepage says (the page is not currently available) ...

Quote:
Faith in Teaching, Inc is an IRS 501 (c) (3) charitable organization located in Orlando, Florida dedicated to funding education in Florida’s faith based community.

Proceeds generated from sales of the “I Believe” license tag will be used to fund the short falls that such educational programs experience as a result of their inability to receive public funds. In addition, the proceeds will fund after school programs, school activities and slots for Florida parents who choose such programs as an after school choice for their children.

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:XF5 ... clnk&gl=us


So even if buying the license plates is voluntary, the state is extending a funding mechanism to different religions unequally. One beneficiary group even admits it is a way to use the government program to get around the ban on government funding for their type of group!



cognito
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Apr 2009
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 675

29 Apr 2009, 10:52 pm

Orwell wrote:
makuranososhi wrote:
Orwell wrote:
Why should it be illegal? "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof..." The state can't prohibit people from expressing their religious views, just as it can't officially endorse one religion over another.

I'm not understanding how this is supposed to be a "separation of church and state" issue.


Without provision for other faiths, it amounts to state support... and my interpretation was the same, that these are state issued plates.


M.

Yes, state issued, but license plates are a rather trivial thing, and I believe states often offer license plates themed for a particular organization or cause without people assuming the government automatically endorses that organization or cause. I think the range of license plate options is most likely driven by requests for a certain type of license plate. So, don't be surprised that there are no Baha'i license plates. It's not really state support of a religion. Florida could probably find enough demand to provide Star of David license plates, though, given the massive Jewish population of South Florida.

Also, the whole "separation of church and state" thing (a phrase never found in the Constitution) seems often to be misinterpreted badly. It's getting to the point where any public profession of faith by someone connected to the government is now criticized as state endorsement, even when it clearly is not. In the US, people are free to follow any faith (or no faith) as their own conscience dictates. Providing a certain license plate style because a lot of people want it is a far cry away from having a state religion- and remember, in the fairly recent past Bible study was a mandatory part of public school curriculum, nowadays teachers can barely even mention religion without fearing reprisal. Our secular society is in no danger from a freaking license plate.

the phrase comes from Reynolds Vs US, and it was inferred from the first amendments phrasing of the for or against clause.


_________________
I am a freak, want to hold my leash?