The problem of SJWs

Post Reply New Topic

I'm not the one giving it, so that doesn't make your case that I'm racist.

Effectively you've said the same thing with two different wordings. The second wording is preferable.

4chan are a bunch of trolls who shouldn't ever be considered even remotely serious.

It never will apply. You are only going to end up in disappointment if you hope to find me saying anything that you could try to use against me. My post history is in the public domain so you are welcome to search it. Just because I don't like SJWs doesn't mean I root for the KKK.

Should those of us who've had sex refrain from saying so to protect the feelings of those who haven't? If so, I got bad news - that's what I'm going to be doing all next week while my fiancée is up.



You keep getting triggered by having it pointed out how it benefits people like you and I. That's not having a "pissfit", or blaming you, or blaming whites in general. Recognizing it exists doesn't mean you have to feel guilt, it just means you should be willing to listen to the experiences of people who don't benefit from it before dismissing and invalidating those experiences.

A privilege is something afforded to a few.

Such as if someone is given a scholarship merely because of their skin tone, that would be considered a privilege. A person getting a job merely because of their sex, that is a privilege. Money is technically a privilege, and most things attributed to someone having "white privilege" is based in economics. So many of those "are you privileged" lists, I know plenty of non-white people who rank very high, while many white people rank low.

People are treating an entire demographic that is full of many different cultures as one monolith, as if they all get the same benefit as the next, while acting like non-white people never get any of that, and it's frankly acting like white people are somehow different from others, as if the "white race" is actually different, even superior, and must be lowered so that everyone might be equal.

Any time one race is singled out for something, it can typically be classified as racism. Treating races differently is racism in the most basic sense.

This is just Bolshevik rhetoric repackaged for identity rather than class.

Bingo. Marxist revolutionaries since the time of Marx keep getting disappointed when the masses don't rise up in revolution. (Turns out the masses usually just want to get rich like everyone else.) So they are constantly in search of another group to serve as the agents (dupes) of revolution -- they try to foment uprising by race, or uprising by gender, or (remarkably for Marxists) uprising by religion (Islam in the West), always in an effort to undermine Western liberal institutions. The "Gramscian damage" (Eric Raymond's phrase) has been extensive, but the Western tradition of liberty and individualism still has some fight left in it, thank goodness.

So supporting racists doesn't make you a racist, oh I see. /s

Hmmm, let me think why. Maybe because I never had to undergo a trial, in the first place? Because I just never was involved in any crime?
That's so racist and white privileged of me! /s

Last edited by XenoMind on 18 Jan 2018, 10:33 am, edited 2 times in total.

I'm not a virgin. My point was that he claims to be a feminist yet he talks like the "male pigs" he thinks he is above.



Just because that's how you see it doesn't mean all those who use the term view it the same way. I've seen it used to attack "evil white people" and even downplay or dismiss the struggles of those who don't fit the mold such as those unlucky enough to be born into the Bible Belt but are not a mindless drone. As far as "benefits" go, until you can prove to me I have a mansion, high ranking job position, a six-figure income, and a smoking hot wife in wait somewhere I don't know about, I am going to keep calling BS. I don't live in my own house or apartment, I've been grinding away at my first and so far only job for nearly 12 years with no promotional offers, my last raise on my income (Which is poverty level) was 20 cents, and being non-religious as well as not a loud obnoxious jerk makes an already small dating pool even smaller for me. Of course, because I don't walk in lockstep with you, none of these things count as struggles to you.

Last edited by Marknis on 18 Jan 2018, 10:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

The idea that white people get treated like a monolith makes me llool.

Whenever a white person commits a heinous crime, their entire history gets examined to try and discover their unique reasons. With a black criminal, this does not happen. Which group gets treated as a monolith in meaningful ways?

After the Vegas shooting, your posts about it were just "He was a white guy! He's evil! His skin color made him do it! Urrrrgggghhh!! !! !!"

They also over-psychoanalyze black people as well, as well as paper of "other races."

There was a guy named Wayne Williams who committed mass murder in the Atlanta area. He was a black man. The "analysis" of him in the news was at least equal to that of Adam Lanza and that ilk.

And don't forget OJ and that Bronco. All shows were preempted to show the Bronco being "chased" by police at about 40 mph.

Look at the big picture. Heinous crimes refers to all heinous crimes, not just mass shootings. Reading Mark's interpretation of my comments as my actual comments makes zero sense, and I find it offensive. Please reply directly to my posts instead.

[Mod]

No personal attacks please. This includes accusing someone of being "triggered".

You're completely right. Thank goodness the liberals are denouncing white privilege and standing up to far-right identity politics which has threatened the Western way of life.

Thanks to standing on the shoulders of giants and the innovations of intersectionality, SJWs are the greatest liberals and individualists yet.