WrongPlanet.net an anti-christian site?
I think 'strident atheism' and the need to rick-roll religion's existence is certain atheists acknowledging that they understand that there's no meaning, at their core they can't deal with it, they need a mission in life and they end up finding that mission in being anti-religion. Once religion's gone, they're going to be between a rock and a hard place over what to wake up in the morning for next.
You're being fairly accurate in your assessment, and as has been pointed out earlier a lot of the provocations and bashing comes from the atheists here not Christians.
To add to the statement, I find it funny that Atheists here aren't bashing Islam like they bash Christians.
Most of the Atheist threads are humorous in nature. Unlike the homophobic, Islamophobic, or general xenophobic crap that comes out of some of the Theists here
btw I have criticized Islam on several occasions, as have others. However Muslims don't post here, as far as I know, or put threads up about Sharia law or whatever. The various Christians however can almost be expected to write about the worst their faith has to offer as there is no shortage of them here. Most of the 'bashing' as you term it comes as a response to really ignorant or offensive statements. When they aren't making offensive statements its rather civil
Actually, the Atheist posts tend to be mocking people whom are Christian, venomous, etc. Your idea of humor is such that if I used the same kind of statements you would be arguing for me to be banned.
Seriously, you may think it is funny, but in reality what you guys are calling funny is often downright offensive. You (as a group) constantly try to mock people whom are religious as being stupid, even people specifically on these forums. Your statements to the you (as a group) do not, is really quite laughable.
I don't engage in that sort of behavior. I am of the Apatheist school of Atheism, and I have posted pictures making fun of Atheism as well. In any case, the light humor you find so offensive is not even close to being equatable with the homophobia and xenophobia that some of the Christians here (including you) are responsible for. There are a lot of harmless Theistic threads that some Atheists do engage in in a non-offensive manner, but I don't expect you would mention that.
That's why I indicated how I was using the word "you." So I'm not addressing you specifically.
Another aspect is that WP's members are from all over the world and many Western countries / societies are no longer as religious as America or the Arab countries. So this cultural divide crops up quite frequently. I've noticed that particularly the bible belt posters of America are often shocked at the level of atheism elsewhere. Christianity is so engrained in their society that they find it difficult to comprehend they are in a minority in the world.
Mention "religion" or "belief systems" and debate will follow like day follows night.
Can't this concept be conveyed without saying people of faith are self-deluded and following an irrational belief system? THAT is how this site is biased against faith. To speak in such derogatory terms and have it not be seem as offensive or attacking shows just how solidly that mindset exists here.
It hurts me. Every. Single. Time.
And yet ... I'm supposed to be believe that is just me being sensitive. That is how my objection to the terms is seen. I accept it, but I will always believe it is wrong. Feels great when people I care about and respect feel free to term an aspect of who I am as deluded and irrational ...
Nobody intends to upset the person behind a belief, but it someone claims something is true, that person has to give others a good reason to believe that, or acknowledge there is no reason anyone else should believe them, or care about that particular idea.
I used to be hurt when people tore down my arguments, but now I see it as an opportunity to learn something new.
There is no reason for people to try sugar coat the Truth; if people believe that one of your beliefs are irrational, show them otherwise. Draw a chain of reason from what you have seen/experienced, to your belief about the world. Avoid logical fallacies at all costs, and remember that if you use a particular form of argument ("I have faith", "You can't disprove God", "You can't explain this, so therefore God..."), others are equally entitled to make the same argument against you ("But I have faith", "You can't disprove my God", "You can't explain this, so therefore Shiva..."). The previous arguments are illogical.
If you can't come up with a good reason for others to believe in something, even if you believe it yourself, then others will probably ignore that idea. If I was to say "I was abducted by Aliens, but I haven't got any proof", I would understand why a rational person wouldn't believe me.
PPR is a place to learn, and have your beliefs tested; if they can't stand up to the heat, you didn't give a good reason for anyone to believe them.
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
I can conceive of many other uses for a forum called PPR. It's a shame it's entirely dominated by the kind of people who can only conceive of using it in one narrow way.
_________________
Not currently a moderator
Most of the posts made by Atheists regarding Christians seem to be questions for elaboration or evidence of claims made by Christians. Most Christians seem to respond with an attitude best expressed by the words "How Dare You!" - Christians seem more interested in being believed than in actually supporting their claims, and are easily insulted when evidence for their claims is requested. Or is it that they know that they can not support their claims, and react with indignation to put off any further questioning?
You assume to much. The person you've accused of this behavior seems to have never used it. Why are you laying the sin on him, when you should be pursuing those who actually commit it instead?
It is offensive to Christians to question their beliefs. I know, because I just finished a face-to-face discussion with a Christian regarding the validity of claims for miracles, and she ended the discussion by saying that I only wanted to contradict her. Actually, I am seeking evidence of an actual miracle, and not yet another "I believe that it was a miracle, so that makes it a miracle" claim.
Not really. This "group" you speak of seems more intent on pointing out the gaping holes and disconnects between Christian faith and Christian behavior. It is the fumbling and stumbling of those same Christians as they try to rationalize these gaps that makes them look stupid.
I'm sorry, that last sentence does not parse. Please try again.
_________________
Last edited by Fnord on 23 Apr 2011, 2:36 pm, edited 2 times in total.
I don't have a need to show people why I believe or sell them on faith, I know it is a waste of my time. But I think the debate that does occur needs to be conducted in terms that do not mock my mental state and intelligence from the very first sentence. Why would I bother to engage with anyone at any level who shows such a complete and utter lack of respect for my ability to think? I know I can't have a mutually respectful discussion because they have already made it clear what they think of everything I could possibly say on the topic: deluded and irrational. Simple self preservation says "walk away. NOW."
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Last edited by DW_a_mom on 23 Apr 2011, 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
It quite honestly takes just as much faith to not believe in God as it does to believe in God.
It takes just as much faith not to believe in a 50-foot tall fire breathing chicken as to believe in it.
If the world's religion didn't exist, no-one would be Atheist. We wouldn't think twice about "not believing in God".
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
It quite honestly takes just as much faith to not believe in God as it does to believe in God.
Wrong.
To "Believe in no god" is to have faith, if only in the absence of a god. This is borderline Agnostic-Atheism, and such faith could just as easily swing towards Theism as Atheism.
To "Not believe in a god" is to have no faith at all. This is true Atheism. By definition, Atheists have no faith - they are faithless.
BTW: I've been through Seminary, so mere word games don't impress me.
_________________
It quite honestly takes just as much faith to not believe in God as it does to believe in God.
Actually it takes less faith and more reliance on facts.
One does not believe a fact. One beholds a fact.
ruveyn
Except there are signs that point to the fact certain events like the Exodus actually happened. Also it should be noted the Egyptians usually had a tendency to destroy all records of things they found embarassing or when something bad happened.
There are cities that have been discovered that people didn't think ever existed that were in the Bible. There is also a point when things stop being random chance.
It's just that people won't respect an idea that can't be backed up, and they find it strange that you came to a conclusion without a reason you can express.
_________________
The scientist only imposes two things, namely truth and sincerity, imposes them upon himself and upon other scientists - Erwin Schrodinger
Member of the WP Strident Atheists
There are cities that have been discovered that people didn't think ever existed that were in the Bible. There is also a point when things stop being random chance.
Just because certain locations mentioned in the Bible may have actually existed, it does not mean that the Bible is anything more than an elaborately distorted historical account. Moreover, it is not de facto evidence that the Bible is God's inerrent and Holy Word.
Remember, those patriarchs seemed hell-bent on supporting their claim as "God's Chosen People", while simultaneously slaughtering entire populations (men, women, and children), and keeping their own women subjugated under male domination; meanwhile claiming justification for these atrocities as being the fruition of "God's Will".
Nice guy, this God of yours...
_________________
Last edited by Fnord on 23 Apr 2011, 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
And we wonder why I don't bother.
The nature of faith makes it impossible to meet the debate standards set by members of this forum. I stand up with gay rights and with "your" side on so many touchy issues, yet the argument I see in defense of hurting my feelings is that Christians do worse, some subset that isn't ME. Two wrongs never make a right.
I'll simply repeat. I am hurt by the terminology that is allowed on WP for discussing faith. I rarely join in any religious discussion because I have no desire to read hurtful phrases over and over and have them defended because they come from "logic.". Logic is no excuse for hurting people and there is no other aspect of my life where people defend it as such.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
I can respect a person who makes an unsupportable claim, as long as the person admits that the claim is unsupportable. I can even respect such a person for adhering to an irrational belief (as long as it hurts no one).
What I can not respect is the person who says, "I believe it, so it must be true, and you had better believe it too!"
Such people inspire more division than unification with their expressions of faith.
_________________
It's just that people won't respect an idea that can't be backed up, and they find it strange that you came to a conclusion without a reason you can express.
I have expressed it and effectively. But repeating myself to those with no actual interest in the answer is not something I am going to do. My life is far too busy for that. I'd rather invest energy where positive impact is actually possible.
I don't have a need to debate faith here, but if someone else does, and expresses their frustration at the way they are allowed, in effect, to be mocked, I will stand up for them.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
It's been over two years since I've used the term "Delusional" to describe people of faith.
Does it still hurt you?
_________________