Why support abortion for rape victims?
actually, I've been a vegetarian (with occasional brief lapses) since 1995. Also, I'm a socialist.
Hey, you still would have been older than me. I've been vegetarian sense I've been born with daily lapses. I guess I must be RADICALLY socialist.
I guess I misunderstood the point you were trying to make. What was your point, exactly?
Applying my health care talents to helping someone is a far cry from forcing me to donate part of my body to them.
What, you don't think that the surgery to cut someone's kidney/liver out, and then to recover from that, counts as time and effort? You don't think that pregnancy counts as time and effort? Not to mention a pretty significant amount of pain and suffering.
Yeah, actually it is. The zef takes over a woman's body pretty damn effectively.
Even a born human does not have the right to use another person's body without their permission, much less an unformed zef. If someone were to try to take my liver without my permission, I would be well within my rights to kill them, no matter how much they needed it.
Abortion, unlike c-sections, do not require 'cutting a woman open.' That's part of why it's safer.
Baka. Do you really f***ing think that women do this casually? It's surgery. From what I hear, it really f***ing hurts. I've heard that in some cultures abortion is used as the primary means of birth control, but I have to think that it's pure ignorance and/or the lack of availability of other forms of birth control that make it so, because swallowing a pill every day must hurt a hell of a lot less.
That pic is a little bit advanced, actually, wikipedia notwithstanding.
http://php.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/i ... ent#Week_6
The level of 'organization' present at that stage is negligible, despite the appearance of 'toes' (no, they're not actually toes, even at 8 weeks).
It's impossible to determine with precision, but it's quite possible to have a fair degree of accuracy. We can look at neurological organization and compare it to the complexity of animal behavior as brains get more and more complex; like I said, a zef isn't even at the level of a fish until the 3rd trimester. EEGs corroborate this conclusion. Things just aren't connected up enough until then.
No, it's like killing an unconscious guy who's physically hooked up to your body and preventing you from living your life, and will be stuck on you for 9 months.
It's not a f***ing "baby." It's a non-sentient, non-sapient zef, using your body without your permission.
It stops being a punishment when and if the woman in question starts wanting it. Once it's born, she can hand it over to CPS or to an adoption agency, and do her best to forget about it, if she doesn't want it.
Pregnancy is one of the greatest gifts that one person can give to another, but without it being a gift given to that person by choice, it becomes a theft of the greatest magnitude instead. It's not a walk in the park.
It's a miserable grueling experience that saps your body so seriously that it literally takes years to recover, and may never be recovered from completely. It's not unusual for women to have permanent physiological damage from pregnancy and childbirth, and I'm not talking about stretch marks or other cosmetic issues.
Funny how pro-life people always end up minimizing the experience of pregnancy and childbirth, every single goddamn thread we go through.
I think that would be a great idea. Anyway, the key difference is this clause: "only a single person is a viable donor".
Ever heard of tissue typing? You can't just take a liver from any random person and stick it into a person. That's part of why waiting for an organ takes so long. Right now, there might be someone out there who you're the only perfect tissue match for, and who will die if you don't happen to liquefy your brain in a motorcycle accident in the next moth or so.
To be clear, I'm a registered organ donor, but it only happens once I'm brain-dead and have no interest in using the parts any more.
Democracy.
Zygote/Embryo/Fetus. Accounts for the entire span of development from fertilization through birth. If you're not one of those, "it's a person from fertilization!" people, then the relevant term would be 'ef.'
I wouldn't exactly say that I was a zef once, any more than I would say that I was an ovum and/or a spermatozoan once; rather, there once existed a zef which eventually became me.
Pregnancy isn't a medical condition either if you are going to go by that definition. It's also a normal state of a healthy mammal. As I said, equivocation.
No, actually, pregnancy is not the normal state of a healthy mammal. The fact that it happens on accident does not make it "normal," it makes it "common."
The medical community considers pregnancy a medical condition requiring close monitoring, periodic blood draws, frequent office visits, and often other (uncomfortable) tests as well, not to mention a suite of special behaviors that the woman is advised to perform in order to make sure everything goes as smoothly as possible. All of the extra care and monitoring is part of why women don't experience the common condition of death in childbirth as frequently as they used to.
If they want the zef, they'll agree that they should be getting adequate prenatal care. If they don't want it, the'll be likely to decline the prenatal care and possibly call it something worse than 'disease.'
It's required for humans, yes. Your language is very imprecise.
My mother was pro-choice. I'm glad to know that I was wanted, and not something that she eventually convinced herself to 'accept.'
I can call it a medical condition. Even a dangerous medical condition.
Breathing does not kill anyone, unless there is poison in the air.
heroism or inaction is a choice.
The zef doesn't get a choice, since it's using the woman's body without her permission.
You are correct that conception is when a genetically unique 2n organism is created, but it is not the start of pregnancy. Pregnancy starts when the zygote implants in the uterus, which less than half of them do.
Presumably you mean "genetically unique." No, it turns it into an organism capable of its own homeostasis.
Only if you consider pregnancy to be always healthy, normal, comfortable, mundane, routine, life-sustaining and good for the woman in question.
None of which it is.[/quote]
So risking yourself for another living thing is completely ludacris? My bed isn't comfortable, it must be a disease. Female apache attack heilo pilots must be a disease too, because it obviously isn't healthy, routine, normal, mundane or life sustaining to get blown up by an rpg.
If that were all true, why am I able to bear being asperger's ridden and lonely? I must have a disease, why don't I go get myself aborted too. Oh yeah the homeless must be a disease as well.
_________________
comedic burp
Yes I do reason being it is the womans choice and her body next off I think it is even worse to force a woman to give birth to a child of a father thats raped her. How is the mother going to explain who his or her daddy is? Not to mention the kid is going to be a living reminder of a result of a man taking advantage of the woman and violating her against her will for the rest of her life! I am no woman but think about it, its common f**kin sense! If I was a woman and raped hell yeah I would get an abortion! How would you like to be a child reminded that your father is a rapist?If I was a child reminded that my father was a rapist I would be depressed for the rest of my life hate my father then probably kill myself!
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Can I have that Embryo Laminated in a Keychain?
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Yeah, you finally brought up suicide didn't you? I expected this was the mindset of a lot of pro choicers. I have SAD, doesn't mean I am going to try to kill myself everytime I feel depressed. I play zombie killing games and watch movies.
Plus, if she is getting raped, she can kill the bastard, she has a right to defend herself!
_________________
comedic burp
Yeah but the bible states thou shalt not kill plus blaming the victim for being raped makes things worse! Not all women are capable of defending themselves against a 200+ lb man unless she has a gun!
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Incorrect.
The health risks of abortion are significantly lower than the health risks of pregnancy.
*Illegal* (unsafe) abortions are risky, of course, but this risk can easily be reduced by making abortion legal and easily available. Maternal death rates in South Africa dropped by 90 percent after abortion was legalized in 1996.
Sources:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22270271
http://arhp.org/uploadDocs/journaleditorialmar2005.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15713153
Last edited by GGPViper on 11 Dec 2013, 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
I never blamed the victim, thanks for implicating that. I said if some one is raping her, she is allowed to kill them in self defence. emphasis on THE RIGHT TO DO SO. Rapists deserve to be shot by their victims. And the bible says "thou shall not kill", not "thou shall save a life or kill or any combination of the two".
_________________
comedic burp
Incorrect.
The health risks of abortion are significantly lower than the health risks of pregnancy.
*Illegal* (unsafe) abortions are risky, of course, but this risk can easily be reduced by making abortion legal and easily available. Maternal death rates in South Africa dropped by 90 percent after abortion was legalized in 1996.
Sources:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22270271
http://arhp.org/uploadDocs/journaleditorialmar2005.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15713153
Death rates of the older women who already had a life, plus if they hadn't been getting illegal abortions, those deaths would not have happened. Interesting two of your sources come from a government source, and none from a private lab or hospital. The only slightly valid but completely biased link is to a co op of doctors whom share opinions on everything.
Illeagl abortions are not the same as going through with a pregnancy, why is this even one of your examples?
_________________
comedic burp
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
I do not blame the problems of poverty on the poor existing. You continue to read into my words more than is there based on your personal faulty assumptions. I believe poverty is one of the most significant problems in this country and in most parts of the world. In my opinion, it is not the poor that are the problem, it is those who drive others into poverty. My point is that a complete ban on abortion would exacerbate the problem of poverty significantly. It is difficult to make progress on poverty when you continuously increase the ranks of the needy.
And I respect the fact that you are entitled to your opinion and your right to express it. As the current law is directly related to the way you would wish to see the law changed, I feel that it is quite relevant. You cannot talk about what the law should be if you do not acknowledge what laws exist now. Personally, I have issues with using any laws to regulate morality other than those absolutely vital to maintaining order and improving the economic stability of a nation. This goes for many laws (unrelated to the current topic) on the books, and I let my representatives to Congress know my positions on a regular basis.
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
Okay, there is a lot I want to say, like how medical condition is synonymous with disease and pregnancy is a normal state of a healthy mammal or the first point was a completely irrelevant tangent or how no matter how many brains you cut up and cross compare and how much behavior you observe you can't feel what it's like to be a fly or "zef"s aren't simply parasites that randomly appear in woman to suck out their blood enternally, but that is way too segmented for me to reply to it all, and most of it's not important. It's really hard and time consuming to insert a shiton of quote tags into a text wall. Anyway, I think this really boils down to one thing. Your group thinks it's okay to terminate a life as long as it's dependent and causing a significant burden, even if temporary, and I think it's absurd because I believe that right of life trumps that as death is permanent, being pregnant, as serious as it is and the lasting effects it has, is temporary. Another thing is a I think the need for so many abortions is a symptom of greater problems that should be dealt with involving poverty, woman's rights, education, and moral standards. It's like hunting more deer because we killed all the wolves.
_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html
sonofghandi
Veteran
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,540
Location: Cleveland, OH (and not the nice part)
just for the record, plenty of parasites are temporary. Mosquitos and ticks are some of the most common parasites, and only attack the host until the host is no longer needed.
You are oversimplifying. Many people who do not agree with do not believe it is ok to terminate a life, as they have a different defintion than you about when life begins. Pregnancy is temporary, but its effects are permanent.[/quote]
Other than dealing with "moral standards," I would agree that addressing these problems would be much more effective in reducing the number of abortions than legislation by far.
I do not understand your hunting analogy. Could you please elaborate some?
_________________
"The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently" -Nietzsche
First of all, it is rather offensive that the title of this thread uses the term "support abortion".
It is not called pro-abortion. It is called pro-choice.
I do believe that any decision regarding pregnancy is a very emotional and difficult choice to make. That being said, I think taking away options (regardless of intention) does more harm on the mother's psyche than good. A woman gets raped against her own will...now imagine that woman having to have that child against her own will. The rape victim will just feel that the ability to make decisions is being taken away from her little by little. That can be mentally damaging.
Granted I know that not all rape victims experience this but I do think a good number of them do.
That said, no one is proud of having abortions. No one likes having them. But in the end, it does become their last resort.
I'm all for decreasing abortions, but it should be done through honest means such as family planning and non-bias counseling. You will not accomplish anything through restriction tactics or those ridiculous ultrasound bills. I hate those ultrasound bills because they're nothing more than a sneak tactic to guilt people out of having abortions.
Also if gun and drug restrictions have taught us anything else, it's that restrictions don't really restrict. People will find a way around those restrictions often to far more dangerous and criminal results than had those restrictions not existed in the first place.
It is not called pro-abortion. It is called pro-choice.
_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html
Please be specific. What has anyone said that makes those who seek abortions sound like they are "sexually inexperienced"? And how is that even remotely relevant? Why do you think that it is "whining" to not want to be pregnant against your will?
This has been explained already, but here it is again: Zygote/Embryo/Fetus.
You are not only factually incorrect, you are off by an order of magnitude.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22270271/
Edit: GGP already submitted a couple of links, and your response was that they were 'invalid because they were government funded'? That they were 'invalid because the women were old'?
Dude, can you even read an abstract? And do you really think that an NIH study is less valid than a bit of data coming from a private clinic? Seriously, you're delusional.
None of these are more likely in an abortion than they are in childbirth.
If it's a gift, it's sometimes a white elephant.
If it's alive, so are the billions of animals slaughtered every year in horrific conditions - and unlike the zefs, those animals can, and do, suffer. If it is human, so is every fingernail paring and tumor ever removed from a human. If it is genetically unique, human, and alive, so is every unimplanted zygote flushed down the toilet by a woman unaware that anything was even a little different that particular month.
Of course not. It can be quite noble, if it's a choice.
Soldiers, in general, choose to risk themselves in combat. We no longer have an active draft, in the US at least.
Asperger's is certainly a medical condition. Homelessness is more of a sociological or cultural condition than a medical one, although it can be caused or exacerbated by medical conditions like schizophrenia.
1. It's still none of anyone's business but the woman involved.
2. appletheclown: the correct spelling is "ludicrous." Spelling it like that lame rapper makes you look ignorant. Mind you, your position in this topic is already doing that quite well enough.
3. I would imagine that I, as a registered nurse, am the only person currently posting to this thread who has actually attended women who were receiving abortions. So I can tell you that abortion in the first twelve weeks is medically on a par with getting your tonsils out. It doesn't require a hospital stay and you are in the clinic for a few hours, tops. How someone can have spun this into "abortions are always more dangerous than childbirth" is one of those mysteries of profound stupidity that only come up when you're around "pro-life" types.
just for the record, plenty of parasites are temporary. Mosquitos and ticks are some of the most common parasites, and only attack the host until the host is no longer needed.
You are oversimplifying. Many people who do not agree with do not believe it is ok to terminate a life, as they have a different defintion than you about when life begins. Pregnancy is temporary, but its effects are permanent.
[/quote]
Yes it's oversimplifying, but here the definition of life appears to be entirely based on homeostasis, thus independent.
Other than dealing with "moral standards," I would agree that addressing these problems would be much more effective in reducing the number of abortions than legislation by far.
I do not understand your hunting analogy. Could you please elaborate some?
I'm not here to debate the morality of casual sex, the way I see it the need for abortions is what would make it immoral, but the hunting analogy is that a problem is solved in a morally questionable way when the problem wouldn't even exist in the first place if it wasn't for morally questionable activity. Ultimately the problem is solved, but it's the not natural way.
_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes
Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Harris: No concessions on abortion |
23 Oct 2024, 3:40 pm |
lawmakers trying to ban abortion pills, because minors. |
24 Oct 2024, 5:56 am |
Childhood trauma support |
27 Nov 2024, 12:53 pm |
Appreciation for shortfatbalduglyman: Share Some Support |
04 Dec 2024, 12:38 am |