Trump Calls for Ban on Muslim Immigrants
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_m ... isprudence
That's is your interpretation from the perspective of your sect of Islam. Militants have a different interpretation.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,371
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
He's a left wing dream boat.
Supports gay marriage.
Tariffs on imports to protect worker pay.
Higher taxes on rich, lower taxes on poor and middle class.
Curtail visa immigration programs so businesses can't bring in "cheap labor".
End NAFTA.
Wants government run national health care (labeled "Obamacare on Steroids" by the right)
Protect the border (keep the cheap illegal labor out to protect worker pay).
So we have this interesting event ...
Labor Unions giving serious thought to endorsing Trump
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/labor ... le/2573359
Even if unions are toying with the idea of endorsing Trump, so far it's the far right (including white supremacists) who are currently in his corner. So far, no one on the left is throwing their support his way, due to his use of racism and paranoia. Incidentally, while Trump had originally backed same sex marriage, he has since changed his tune in order to court the right.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Moderating
While lively debate with few limits is encouraged in PPR, please note that there are still rules:
viewtopic.php?t=73837 (Site rules)
viewtopic.php?t=204613 (PPR Guidelines)
Some recent posts in this thread contrary to the letter and spirit of these fairly flexible rules have been removed.
Please pay special attention to these particular sections of the guidelines, in particular the bold italicized sentences:
Other groups of people.
While it is acceptable to attack and debate beliefs (political, religious etc) it is not acceptable to make generalised attacks on the adherents of those beliefs. It is acceptable to say that Republicanism, Liberalism, Christianity, Islam are stupid but not acceptable to make generalised attacks saying that Republicans, Liberals, Christians or Muslims are morons. You could say that some of these people are stupid because of (reason) but not make generalised attacks on groups of people. Similarly you could not say "Christians are morons" or "Muslims are terrorists" or "People on welfare are bums". Confine your attacks to the beliefs and politics, not the people holding them. The one exception to this is public figures themselves – by the very nature of their roles they are personally open to criticism.
Personal attacks.
Posters must refrain from making personal attacks. Do not call people stupid or a***holes etc for not agreeing with you. You are allowed to think this - moderators aren't the thought police! Just don't express it in your posts! Attack the opinion not the poster. Personal attacks are a slightly fuzzy area because criticising someone's political or religious beliefs could be interpreted by some as a personal attack (but moderators do not consider it such) similarly it is easy to insinuate that someone is stupid for having various opinions but frankly the moderators don't have the time or inclination to wade through every post looking for sarcastic comments! Provided people don't get too out of hand this forum is given a wide scope for debate; which frankly is what the members themselves want here, not moderators stepping in all the time censoring their opinions.
Ha ha good one
What is with the massive red herring after that? You make it sound like Trump proposed nationalised health care. In reality he is proposing replacing Obamacare, well with..wait for it Obamacare. What he is proposing is just another version of Obama care. Spin that.
The guy is a moron, he speaks on issues he has no clue about like vaccines and autism, as if he is medically trained.
goatfish57
Veteran
Joined: 12 Nov 2015
Gender: Male
Posts: 617
Location: In a village in La Mancha whose name I cannot recall
All this has turned into is another heckling thread from the Left. So far, I haven't heard any good ideas on how to stop the terrorism coming here. Anyone have any good ideas? (Since the current president is useless.)
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
Hello?! Anyone have any better ideas? All the current president can come up with is taking away our guns more. He's already decreased our country's armed forces by sending them everywhere else in the world but here in America! Anyone could take us over - we are like sitting ducks! So someone on the Left better come up with some brilliant ideas instead of just calling names!
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
Donald Trump's 'Immigration Reform'
Bernie Sander's 'Immigration Policy'
Look at those carefully. They are polar opposite. They do not agree on how to handle immigration. Trump wants to build a wall and get ride of illegal immigrants. Sanders wants to integrate illegal immigrants who have been here for 5+ years and reform and streamline the immigration process for the others.
Jeb Bush doesn't want open borders. "More border security and military to the border: Bush would provide more border security through increasing real and virtual fencing, drones, and border agents."
He went back on that. "What I'd like to see is a private system without the artificial lines around every state. I have a big company with thousands and thousands of employees. And if I'm negotiating in New York or in New Jersey or in California, I have like one bidder. Nobody can bid."
“I think I’m evolving, and I think I’m a very fair person, but I have been for traditional marriage...I am for traditional marriage, I am for a marriage between a man and a woman.”
"Donald, go on the record," says Stern. "You're for gay marriage."
"Well, I'm not," responds Trump, surprising both Stern and his co-host Robin Quivers. He continues, "It's never been an argument that's been discussed with me very much. People know that it's not my thing one way or the other."
Well, that's general and nonspecific.
Medical marijuana ok, legalizing not.
Is he? Or... do you desperately want him to be? You're holding onto the Trump of the 90's despite him going back on everything he has said since then.
It's obvious you have no idea what the left-wing values and thinks. When you responded to my post, you nitpicked issues, responded to a couple of them (and were wrong), and went "See! Donald Trump is Eugene Debs reincarnate!" Neverminding the major issues Trump is glaring wrong about. He's still anti-Net neutrality, he's still pro-Patriot Act, doesn't believe in climate change, pro-life, etc, etc, etc.
What does any of that have to do with terrorism and immigration - the reason why "Trump Calls For Ban On Muslim Immigrants"? You're addressing immigration as a whole with illegal immigration. The terrorism has to be addressed first. Close the borders on all immigrants or just Muslims? (which I don't believe can be done anyway, but all immigrants can be stopped by the President).
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
Donald Trump's 'Immigration Reform'
Bernie Sander's 'Immigration Policy'
Look at those carefully. They are polar opposite. They do not agree on how to handle immigration. Trump wants to build a wall and get ride of illegal immigrants. Sanders wants to integrate illegal immigrants who have been here for 5+ years and reform and streamline the immigration process for the others.
Both Trump and Sanders want a secure border.
The reason they want to secure the border is to protect worker pay.
That is right from the Socialist platform, hence both left-wing economics.
He went back on that. "What I'd like to see is a private system without the artificial lines around every state. I have a big company with thousands and thousands of employees. And if I'm negotiating in New York or in New Jersey or in California, I have like one bidder. Nobody can bid."
Sept. 28, 2015
Trump Pushes Single Payer Healthcare, Tax Increase on Wealthy
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... n-wealthy/
"Donald, go on the record," says Stern. "You're for gay marriage."
"Well, I'm not," responds Trump, surprising both Stern and his co-host Robin Quivers. He continues, "It's never been an argument that's been discussed with me very much. People know that it's not my thing one way or the other."
Sept 7, 2015
Donald Trump on Kentucky clerk: Same-sex marriage the 'law of the land'
http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/04/politics/ ... kim-davis/
It's obvious you have no idea what the left-wing values and thinks. When you responded to my post, you nitpicked issues, responded to a couple of them (and were wrong), and went "See! Donald Trump is Eugene Debs reincarnate!" Neverminding the major issues Trump is glaring wrong about. He's still anti-Net neutrality, he's still pro-Patriot Act, doesn't believe in climate change, pro-life, etc, etc, etc.
Donald Trump on Abortion: “I’m Pro-Life and I Have Been Pro-Life”
http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/26/dona ... -pro-life/
There is a reason why the big labor unions are thinking of endorsing him over Clinton.
Clinton won't end NAFTA
Clinton won't secure the border
Clinton won't do tariffs on imports
Clinton won't curtail "cheap labor" immigration programs.
Clinton won't shift taxes from the poor & middle class to the rich.
These are Socialist ideas.
Trump promises to try to do all that.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,371
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
But this thread isn't about stopping terrorism, but about how Trump is a narcissistic asshat scapegoating a whole population of people to satisfy his political ambitions.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
But this thread isn't about stopping terrorism, but about how Trump is a narcissistic asshat scapegoating a whole population of people to satisfy his political ambitions.
Ok, so who do you think should run for the Republican side?
_________________
Me grumpy?
I'm happiness challenged.
Your neurodiverse (Aspie) score: 83 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 153 of 200 You are very likely neurotypical
Darn, I flunked.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,371
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
But this thread isn't about stopping terrorism, but about how Trump is a narcissistic asshat scapegoating a whole population of people to satisfy his political ambitions.
Ok, so who do you think should run for the Republican side?
Considering the possibility of a Republican win, I'd like to see the most competent, sanest candidate, which is probably John Kasich.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
JD Vance Spreads Debunked Claims About Haitian Immigrants |
20 Oct 2024, 6:37 am |
Starmer Calls For The 'Return Of The Sausages' |
29 Sep 2024, 7:06 pm |
Calls For Probe Into RFK JR After Whale Story Resurfaces |
03 Sep 2024, 8:17 pm |
Leonard Susskind calls the end of String Theory |
Today, 3:02 am |