Fake News?
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,694
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The hole in the building was almost perfectly round with no evidence of impact to the sides; some might say more like a cruise missile.....now let me see...who does the U.S. trust with their cruise missiles??
This plus the sudden collapse of Building #7 makes me dubious of the government's claims. It's almost as though the buildings were built to fall intentionally.
I don't claim to be an expert on the happenings of 9/11, or how or why the buildings reacted the way they did when hit by the planes. But there is something insulting to the dead, and their surviving loved ones, by saying the Al Qaeda agents who had committed mass murder were actually innocent.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
The hole in the building was almost perfectly round with no evidence of impact to the sides; some might say more like a cruise missile.....now let me see...who does the U.S. trust with their cruise missiles??
This plus the sudden collapse of Building #7 makes me dubious of the government's claims. It's almost as though the buildings were built to fall intentionally.
I don't claim to be an expert on the happenings of 9/11, or how or why the buildings reacted the way they did when hit by the planes. But there is something insulting to the dead, and their surviving loved ones, by saying the Al Qaeda agents who had committed mass murder were actually innocent.
I'm sorry to say I don't agree with you, Bill.
First you say you're not an expert. What this means Bill is that you admit you don't know all of the facts and are not able to understand why the buildings fell and etc.
And then you make a wild ess guess and, without all the facts (as you've just told us), you make up your mind, and would use your self-admitted lack of understanding to act as judge and jury to make an assumption? Sounds kind of sketchy.
And in your great ignorance you try to claim the moral high ground. There's a whole political party trying to do that very thing, right now you know.
The thing that's insulting here is someone who, through their ignorance, have decided they do not need to understand the facts of the matter and automatically jump to the corrupt government explanation, without actually knowing this is true and then sweep the entire mess under the rug and forget about whether the accusations pushed by the government have any basis in truth.
This is called giving "short shrift" to the memories of the dead, Bill; you can do better than just try to argue, you know, Bill. Doing what you are doing is VERY insulting to the memories of those that died.
Think about it. Is accepting the government's stance without the utmost scrutiny honoring the dead? I know you like to accept everything your mommy/daddy (the government) tells you.
There are extremely thorough and detailed debunkings of 9/11 conspiracy theories all over the web. Firefighters who were actually at the scene of WTC 7 were not at all surprised the building collapsed. I trust people who were actually at the scene more than people coming up with conspiracy theories over the internet.
I don't believe everything "the government" tells me. I use my own f*****g brain to come up with conclusions. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracies clearly don't have a logical thinking brain.
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Shouldn't John Podesta be held accountable for being so incompetent with his web security? Perhaps this is because I am probably more computer literate than most but to me there really is no excuse for falling for these phishing schemes on the equivalence of one of those Nigerian prince emails. There was so little attention paid to securing their data that what is likely is that multiple entities gained access, there is no telling where any of it came from. The 'intelligence' behind this is even more dubious than the Iraq 'WMDs' and the media is playing the fool once again.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,694
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The hole in the building was almost perfectly round with no evidence of impact to the sides; some might say more like a cruise missile.....now let me see...who does the U.S. trust with their cruise missiles??
This plus the sudden collapse of Building #7 makes me dubious of the government's claims. It's almost as though the buildings were built to fall intentionally.
I don't claim to be an expert on the happenings of 9/11, or how or why the buildings reacted the way they did when hit by the planes. But there is something insulting to the dead, and their surviving loved ones, by saying the Al Qaeda agents who had committed mass murder were actually innocent.
I'm sorry to say I don't agree with you, Bill.
First you say you're not an expert. What this means Bill is that you admit you don't know all of the facts and are not able to understand why the buildings fell and etc.
And then you make a wild ess guess and, without all the facts (as you've just told us), you make up your mind, and would use your self-admitted lack of understanding to act as judge and jury to make an assumption? Sounds kind of sketchy.
And in your great ignorance you try to claim the moral high ground. There's a whole political party trying to do that very thing, right now you know.
The thing that's insulting here is someone who, through their ignorance, have decided they do not need to understand the facts of the matter and automatically jump to the corrupt government explanation, without actually knowing this is true and then sweep the entire mess under the rug and forget about whether the accusations pushed by the government have any basis in truth.
This is called giving "short shrift" to the memories of the dead, Bill; you can do better than just try to argue, you know, Bill. Doing what you are doing is VERY insulting to the memories of those that died.
Think about it. Is accepting the government's stance without the utmost scrutiny honoring the dead? I know you like to accept everything your mommy/daddy (the government) tells you.
I think Marshal gave a very good answer.
And no, I don't accept everything my government tells me. I never believed W Shrub's justification for attacking Iraq, knowing he was trying to just finish his dad's job. And I certainly don't think the Kennedy assassination was carried out by just Lee Harvey Oswald, as the government claims, but was the work of fanatical Anti-Castroites who had been on the CIA's payroll as contract agents, and contacts.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
This fake news is being generated by flat earthers and moon landing deniers like Alex Jones, and read by people who aren't mislead into believing such horse sh*t, but who want it to be true.
You don't even know what you are calling a conspiracy, how could you know what is true or not. You are admitted to believing anything CNN reports and they're the biggest proponents of "fake news"
The government lied to us about alleged intelligence that showed Iraq had WMDs, and they are now lying to us about Russia hacking our election. Of course, it's always the other side who lies, right? I still amazed that there are Pubs who are in denial bout Iraq -- and, of course, amazed there are Dems who believe the BS currently flowing coming from the Obama administration.
_________________
What do you call a hot dog in a gangster suit?
Oscar Meyer Lansky
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
Very few diehards left for the invasion of Iraq, I feel like Republican voters sent a pretty clear message repudiating the war by voting Donald Trump considering what he said about Bush, the war, and 9/11. This stuff with Russia is even more reckless as Russia probably have even more advanced nuclear forces than the US does as opposed to crumbling nation of Iraq, Democrats are intentionally being misleading too trying imply that the Russians actually hacked the results of the election. Bush, Obama, and Clinton are all neocons and all CIA backed; the CIA has been in control of this country since at least Reagan after they temporarily lost a grip on power with the intelligence revelations of the mid-70s. Thinking Russia 'hacked' the election is basically the equivalent of believing the Saddam Hussein was giving refuge al-Qaeda in addition to the WMDs, it's something these freaks just desperately want to convince people of to justify their evil deeds.
It's hard to even have begrudging respect for Obama at this point, he's so childish and hypocritical with almost everything he says or does. The whole Democratic campaign was about how Trump was a loose cannon who would let his ego get the best of him and cause international incidents but that is exactly what the Obama and the Democrats are doing right now. Likewise about the whole not accepting the results of a free and fair democratic election and peaceful transfer of power, it really is shameful.
I don't believe everything "the government" tells me. I use my own f*****g brain to come up with conclusions. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracies clearly don't have a logical thinking brain.
Well that's great...at least I know we have one working brain between us. So what did your brain think of the way Bldg. 7 fell? Didn't it seem a little odd to your thinking? Did you actually take the time to think? Most thinking people of my aquantance have some unanswered questions.
And what about the Pentagon attack? When those wings hit a building they're not only full of fuel but they each carry two very heavy gigantic jet engines.....Where's the debris? What other answer does your big brain give you? Early reports were there was only one jet engine found.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,694
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
This fake news is being generated by flat earthers and moon landing deniers like Alex Jones, and read by people who aren't mislead into believing such horse sh*t, but who want it to be true.
You don't even know what you are calling a conspiracy, how could you know what is true or not. You are admitted to believing anything CNN reports and they're the biggest proponents of "fake news"
I am absolutely sure that Pizzagate is absolute bullsh*t. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what is truth and what isn't. Pizzagate and W Shrub's justification for the Iraq war were clearly fake to anyone with enough brain cells.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Tollorin
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=27679.jpg)
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
I don't believe everything "the government" tells me. I use my own f*****g brain to come up with conclusions. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracies clearly don't have a logical thinking brain.
Well that's great...at least I know we have one working brain between us. So what did your brain think of the way Bldg. 7 fell? Didn't it seem a little odd to your thinking? Did you actually take the time to think? Most thinking people of my aquantance have some unanswered questions.
And what about the Pentagon attack? When those wings hit a building they're not only full of fuel but they each carry two very heavy gigantic jet engines.....Where's the debris? What other answer does your big brain give you? Early reports were there was only one jet engine found.
The tower seven fell down from fires free to roam without much intervention from the firemen who were more than enough busy elsewhere, as for the debris of jet on the pentagon, they must have been mixed with the debris of pentagon as the jet got right through it.
_________________
Down with speculators!! !
I don't believe everything "the government" tells me. I use my own f*****g brain to come up with conclusions. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracies clearly don't have a logical thinking brain.
Well that's great...at least I know we have one working brain between us. So what did your brain think of the way Bldg. 7 fell? Didn't it seem a little odd to your thinking? Did you actually take the time to think? Most thinking people of my aquantance have some unanswered questions.
And what about the Pentagon attack? When those wings hit a building they're not only full of fuel but they each carry two very heavy gigantic jet engines.....Where's the debris? What other answer does your big brain give you? Early reports were there was only one jet engine found.
The tower seven fell down from fires free to roam without much intervention from the firemen who were more than enough busy elsewhere, as for the debris of jet on the pentagon, they must have been mixed with the debris of pentagon as the jet got right through it.
OK. I understand some of what you're trying to propose...BUT now you must give us the evidence you used to make your conjecture.
Otherwise we have to believe you're just trying to fabricate the whole thing using nothing but your wild imagination.
For example: I base my statements upon videos showing the untouched Building 7 after the towers fell. And the fact there were many hundreds of firefighters available and fires were not reported in Building 7. YOU need to provide evidence for your contention there "were" fires overlooked (?) by the fire department.
Additionally my comments about the Pentagon were based on photos published online and, if you search a little, you can view them also, despite all attempts at erasing the evidence.
You can't just pull little green men out of your butt to prove your contention...let's see the facts. Saying "the jet got right through it" means...if the wings just "got through" then where are the holes or signs of impact?
Tollorin
Veteran
![User avatar](./download/file.php?avatar=27679.jpg)
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,178
Location: Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
I don't believe everything "the government" tells me. I use my own f*****g brain to come up with conclusions. People who believe in 9/11 conspiracies clearly don't have a logical thinking brain.
Well that's great...at least I know we have one working brain between us. So what did your brain think of the way Bldg. 7 fell? Didn't it seem a little odd to your thinking? Did you actually take the time to think? Most thinking people of my aquantance have some unanswered questions.
And what about the Pentagon attack? When those wings hit a building they're not only full of fuel but they each carry two very heavy gigantic jet engines.....Where's the debris? What other answer does your big brain give you? Early reports were there was only one jet engine found.
The tower seven fell down from fires free to roam without much intervention from the firemen who were more than enough busy elsewhere, as for the debris of jet on the pentagon, they must have been mixed with the debris of pentagon as the jet got right through it.
OK. I understand some of what you're trying to propose...BUT now you must give us the evidence you used to make your conjecture.
Otherwise we have to believe you're just trying to fabricate the whole thing using nothing but your wild imagination.
For example: I base my statements upon videos showing the untouched Building 7 after the towers fell. And the fact there were many hundreds of firefighters available and fires were not reported in Building 7. YOU need to provide evidence for your contention there "were" fires overlooked (?) by the fire department.
Additionally my comments about the Pentagon were based on photos published online and, if you search a little, you can view them also, despite all attempts at erasing the evidence.
You can't just pull little green men out of your butt to prove your contention...let's see the facts. Saying "the jet got right through it" means...if the wings just "got through" then where are the holes or signs of impact?
I base my statements on what specialists (Like engineers knowing what they talk about) had said on 9/11.
Just from some quick search.
The official story is so far the most convincing one.
_________________
Down with speculators!! !
Just from some quick search.
The official story is so far the most convincing one.
Same.
Thanks. I watched various videos debunking WTC 7 conspiracy theories ten years ago. I was curious as to why it fell the way it did, and I found a convincing evidence for what actually happened online. I don't feel like posting these things for people too lazy to look them up for themselves. It isn't my damn job.
This fake news is being generated by flat earthers and moon landing deniers like Alex Jones, and read by people who aren't mislead into believing such horse sh*t, but who want it to be true.
You don't even know what you are calling a conspiracy, how could you know what is true or not. You are admitted to believing anything CNN reports and they're the biggest proponents of "fake news"
I am absolutely sure that Pizzagate is absolute bullsh*t. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what is truth and what isn't. Pizzagate and W Shrub's justification for the Iraq war were clearly fake to anyone with enough brain cells.
It's just as you say Bill. From the Iraq war through the admitted false flag incident and through the government's use of the civilian population as subjects for LSD testing, etc. etc., etc. we've (well some of us at least) learned the government has no scruples generating false information, FALSE NEWS if you will, and passing it off to a gullible populace as truth.
And yet there are people that will accept every lie sent their way because these people have been trained "not to talk back to their superiors" and to take the subservient role. One of the common mistakes of parenthood I'm afraid, and one which corrupt governments know how to take advantage of, as they've shown us in the past with the examples you provide.
OK so let's imagine he had a kidney transplant, that doesn't mean he was responsible for 9/11. Any evidence that was actually Bin Laden? Oh no wait, he was killed and chucked into the ocean. Dead men tell no tales....
I do not believe the Israelis were behind 9/11, or that Bin Laden was innocent of that attack. I have not seen or heard of any convincing evidence to sway my opinion.
Why would the Israelis even want to risk losing their most important allie with such a scheme?
You don't want to believe it. They can get away with whatever they want. They didn't do it behind the backs of the top dogs in the US. It was only the lower staff in the FBI and police that were left furious. The CIA etc knew all about the hijackers beforehand, bit like they did with the latest attack in Germany.
No, I know the Israelis weren't going to plan an attack against us, because they'd know they'd risk cutting themselves off from their sugar daddy. Al Qaeda, on the other hand, had absolutely nor problem in attacking us, as that's the whole reason why a terrorist organization exists.
But seriously, why are you so dismissive of Muslim terrorists attacking us, but so eager to accuse the Israelis of guilt?
So ignore all of the evidence because 'you know. The Israelis bombed one of your ships for 3 hours, they can do what they want. Sorry, you're making it out like I'm aying Israel attacked you. Parts of your government and part of Israel's did it, and lower parts of the FBI were left infuriated. Patsies from the gulf states were just paid. The plan was set out in the late 90's.
But where's the proof, other than conspiracy theories?
You really need to get over this notion of "conspiracy theories". Conspiracies happen all the time. The US was lead into 2 wars against Iraq because of conspiracy theories pumped out by the media. It was a conspiracy theory that we went into Libya because we wanted to free the people of Libya. It was a conspiracy theory that we wanted to go into Syria in 2013 because Assad attacked his own people with chemical weapons. All pumped out by the mainstream/corporate media. And there's no end to it. Instead, you actually need to look at the facts. Multiple Israelis were arrested on the day, and no one is suggesting that it was just that Israel attacked the US and that's not possible because they wouldn't want to lose their backing. Israel attacked a US ship before and you believed the conspiracy theory that it was just a mistake. In the late 1990's the think tank, the Project For The New American Century was formed and it called for a new Pearl Harbor in order to have a pretext to get into Iraq and change the regime. Instead we were fed a bunch of lies as to why we needed to go into Iraq.
I wouldn't be surprised if a great number of people had been arrested after 9/11, only to be released when found to have had no connection to the attack. A few of them, in this case, happened to be Israelis. That doesn't prove a conspiracy.
Look, I know there's just no amount of evidence I could produce to you that would change your mind. I only continue hoping that others with open minds will see what I write, even if it's just one person. Numerous Israelis were arrested on 9/11, not by mistake, some were arrested with explosives in their van and others were arrested with traces of explosives in their van, one of the men being positively identified as being the man seen in one of the towers the day before. They were deported back to Israel on visa violations and went onto an Israeli talk show saying they were there to "document the event". What evidence do you have that some guy in a cave on dialysis did it all?
If that man on dialysis has a professional terror network at his disposal, along with a grudge against the USA, anything is possible.
I'm just not seeing the Israelis having it out for their benefactor.
OK I get it, you don't believe it so it isn't true...
The US and Israel have used Al Qaeda for covert operations before and after 9/11, why is it so hard to believe they'd have done it on 9/11.
No, it's because your argument has no supportive evidence, save for the purely circumstantial "evidence" of Israelis being temporarily held by authorities, that said Israelis had allegedly been cheering as the towers fell, and because a van rented by them allegedly had bomb residue. That, and because you personally hate Israel.
And what proof is there that Bin Laden ever worked for America or Israel? Bin Laden wanted us out of Saudi Arabia, feeling infidels on the land of the Prophet was an insult that couldn't be forgiven. While many fighters in Afghanistan had been trained and financed by the US, Bin Laden and his crew were not one of them, because as a millionaire, Bin Laden could self-finance his organization rather than depending on the hated infidels.
After Pearl Harbor, Churchill had gotten his first decent night's sleep in months, because he knew America would be entering into the war on the side of Britain. Did you consider the possibility that those Israelis, if they were indeed Mossad, were cheering for very much the same reason? That they thought this would have to set America into a win or death war with Islamic extremism?
Israelis being arrested on 9/11 filming and celebrating as the first plane hit, being arrested with traces of explosives in their van after being seen in the towers the day before and other Israelis being arrested with a van packed with explosives is "circumstantial"??
Bin Laden worked for the CIA in the 1980's to fight against the Soviets, you didn't know that?? Bin Laden didn't carry out 9/11.
Yes that's pretty much exactly why they were cheering after the first plane hit!! The only problem being that no one knew it was a terrorist attack at that time, they did though.
_________________
"No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?"
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Some good news... |
24 Nov 2024, 8:32 pm |
Good news
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
26 Jan 2025, 6:49 pm |
Mirror life research in the news |
21 Dec 2024, 2:28 pm |
NYT: Tulsi Gabbard and Russian News Media |
20 Nov 2024, 8:47 pm |