If a girl is raped and pregnant, should she keep the baby?

Page 71 of 94 [ 1500 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 ... 94  Next

DaKing
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2011
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 271
Location: Planet Earth

01 Oct 2011, 4:59 am

If a girl is raped then she MUST abort


_________________
IM BACK!


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

01 Oct 2011, 10:49 am

aspi-rant wrote:


Image



Looks just like its daddy.

ruveyn



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

01 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm

ruveyn wrote:
aspi-rant wrote:


Image



Looks just like its daddy.

ruveyn


Looks just like the mommy too at that stage of development...



Giftorcurse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,887
Location: Port Royal, South Carolina

27 Oct 2012, 7:40 pm

Abortion all the way. Children born of rape are usually frowned upon. Doesn't help that a lot of adopters are scum.


_________________
Yes, I'm still alive.


Aspiegaming
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Sep 2012
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,728
Location: Hagerstown, MD

27 Oct 2012, 7:47 pm

You know what? A child born of rape is supposedly born. The mother and everyone else conspires to keep the identity of the boy or girl's real father a secret. I don't like that particular scenario. Sooner or later, the child will find out the truth and then attempt suicide.


_________________
I am sick, and in so being I am the healthy one.
If my darkness or eccentricity offends you, I don't really care.
I will not apologize for being me.

There is no such thing as perfect. We are beautiful as we are. With all our imperfections, we can do anything.


LeeAnderson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 936
Location: Cookeville, Tennessee

27 Oct 2012, 8:07 pm

I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

27 Oct 2012, 10:44 pm

LeeAnderson wrote:
I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.


My stance is keep or adoption, the child is an innocent life, and I find it laughable that many people are against the death penalty when it comes to murderers, but are okay with butchering innocent children.

The woman is the victim of a horrible crime, however that doesn't mean the woman should have the right to murder an innocent child either. Two wrongs don't make a right.



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

27 Oct 2012, 11:11 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
LeeAnderson wrote:
I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.


My stance is keep or adoption, the child is an innocent life, and I find it laughable that many people are against the death penalty when it comes to murderers, but are okay with butchering innocent children.

The woman is the victim of a horrible crime, however that doesn't mean the woman should have the right to murder an innocent child either. Two wrongs don't make a right.

It's not innocent, and even if it were, it doesn't have the right to use her body without her permission.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

27 Oct 2012, 11:17 pm

Inuyasha wrote:
LeeAnderson wrote:
I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.


My stance is keep or adoption, the child is an innocent life, and I find it laughable that many people are against the death penalty when it comes to murderers, but are okay with butchering innocent children.

The woman is the victim of a horrible crime, however that doesn't mean the woman should have the right to murder an innocent child either. Two wrongs don't make a right.


"A fan letter to certain conservative politicians":

(trigger warning)
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2012/10/25/a ... liticians/

(no, seriously, trigger warning).

Quote:
P.S.: I love it when you say that you “stand for innocent life” when it comes to denying abortions in cases of rape! It implicitly suggests that the women I rape are in some way complicit in and guilty of the crimes I commit on top of, and inside of, their bodies! Which works out perfectly for me. Keep it up


_________________
.


UnLoser
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Mar 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 655

27 Oct 2012, 11:53 pm

My opinion is that having the baby would be the right thing to do, but no one should ever be forced to have a child if they were raped. Barring rape, though, it's irresponsible and amoral to kill an unborn baby to escape from the consequences of a choice you knowingly made.

On second thought, I have conflicting thoughts on whether the lives of unborn babies are really that important. After all, people kill millions of animals that are both more intelligent and more capable of feeling pain. Babies may be human, but their thoughts are primitive and they feel pain no greater than an animal would.

In an ideal world, no babies or animals would be killed, but considering that I allow the killing of animals and continue to eat meat, I see no way I could condemn the killing of unborn babies without feeling like a dirty hypocrite. So I guess I have to choose logic over tribal instincts. I can't live at odds with myself.

Those are my thoughts. They make me uncomfortable, too.



Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

28 Oct 2012, 1:47 am

LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LeeAnderson wrote:
I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.


My stance is keep or adoption, the child is an innocent life, and I find it laughable that many people are against the death penalty when it comes to murderers, but are okay with butchering innocent children.

The woman is the victim of a horrible crime, however that doesn't mean the woman should have the right to murder an innocent child either. Two wrongs don't make a right.

It's not innocent, and even if it were, it doesn't have the right to use her body without her permission.


By definition it is an innocent, and furthermore, if you think about it, the child didn't ask to be put in the woman's body in the first place. How about you all do some research on creating an artificial womb to put the child in, over drooling over murdering innocent children.

Two wrongs do not make a right. We're talking about a human child, not a tumor, not a disease. A child is not responsible for whatever crimes one of their parents committed.



AspieOtaku
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,051
Location: San Jose

28 Oct 2012, 4:13 am

No because she didnt choose to get pregnant and was forced agaist her will furthermore it would be difficult for the chold being born to find out his or her father was a rapist.


_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList


alpineglow
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,002

28 Oct 2012, 8:27 am

donnie_darko wrote:
I'm pro-life but it does seem kind of cruel to say a girl who's raped HAS to become a mom. Though on the other hand I find the idea of killing a baby because of the circumstances they were created by appalling. What do you think?

I guess I would say abortion is acceptable in the case of rape if the girl is under 14 or so and isn't physically capable of having a baby, or if the woman is suicidal as a result of the rape because that would classify as a life-threatening situation. I hate the idea that the rapist's baby should be killed because of what their father did, to me it's a form of honor killing and most religious pro-lifers actually support abortion when it comes to rape which I find inconsistent.

I just think if it HAS to be the mother or the baby, the mother should come first. But if the girl/woman is physically and emotionally capable of having the baby, she should have it probably and if she doesn't like the baby because it reminds her of its dad, she can give it up for adoption.

Why is any of this your interest or your business to have an opinion on in the first place?



blackelk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 308
Location: New York

28 Oct 2012, 8:36 am

LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LeeAnderson wrote:
I think it should be her choice either way. It's none of my or anyone else's business as far as I'm concerned, when I think about right and wrong as how I see it.


My stance is keep or adoption, the child is an innocent life, and I find it laughable that many people are against the death penalty when it comes to murderers, but are okay with butchering innocent children.

The woman is the victim of a horrible crime, however that doesn't mean the woman should have the right to murder an innocent child either. Two wrongs don't make a right.

It's not innocent, and even if it were, it doesn't have the right to use her body without her permission.


How is it not innocent?


_________________
"Meaninglessness inhibits fullness of life and is therefore equivalent to illness. Meaning makes a great many things endurable ? perhaps everything.?


Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

28 Oct 2012, 9:38 am

^ It does not make sense to call a thing without sentience "innocent".

Rocks are not innocent either.

Iniyusha wrote:
By definition it is an innocent

Noun: An innocent person, in particular.

It is not a person -> not innocent, not guilty , not anything.

Quote:
In an ideal world, no babies or animals would be killed
And the locusts would win.

Quote:
and furthermore, if you think about it, the child didn't ask to be put in the woman's body in the first place.

What child?

Quote:
How about you all do some research on creating an artificial womb to put the child in, over drooling over murdering innocent children.

"murdering", "innocent" "children". We have been in this rodeo before, daring. You do not get to hijack English language to emotionally charge the issue. Abortion is not murder. What gets killed is not innocent. And what is killed is not a child.

Quote:
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Three wrongs definitely do not do it. Rape + denial of the most basic right, the right to decide what happens to your body + forcing a birth to happen in this overpopulated world. That's three wrongs.

Let the woman choose.

Quote:
We're talking about a human child,
No, we are not.


_________________
.


blackelk
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 308
Location: New York

28 Oct 2012, 9:47 am

Vexcalibur wrote:
^ It does not make sense to call a thing without sentience "innocent".

Rocks are not innocent either.

Iniyusha wrote:
By definition it is an innocent

Noun: An innocent person, in particular.

It is not a person -> not innocent, not guilty , not anything.

Quote:
In an ideal world, no babies or animals would be killed
And the locusts would win.


The closest synonym to "innocent" is blameless. The child is blameless.

Quote:
Definition of INNOCENT

1
a : free from guilt or sin especially through lack of knowledge of evil : blameless <an innocent child>


Is the child free of guilt? Yes. Does it have lack of knowledge of evil? Yes. Is it blameless? Yes. Fits all criteria of being innocent.

Not a person? If it isn't a person, what is it? What species is it?


_________________
"Meaninglessness inhibits fullness of life and is therefore equivalent to illness. Meaning makes a great many things endurable ? perhaps everything.?