12 Aug 2007, 12:58 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, we've reached page 80, and have accomplished ostensibly nothing. Congrats all around.
Only because you're too stupid to understand what sexuality actually is.
Actually, you're the one who seems rather abnormal in that department.
No I'm not. Most people would accept that one's sexuality is determined by who they're attracted to, not who they have sex with.
12 Aug 2007, 12:59 pm
12 Aug 2007, 12:59 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:02 pm
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, we've reached page 80, and have accomplished ostensibly nothing. Congrats all around.
Only because you're too stupid to understand what sexuality actually is.
Actually, you're the one who seems rather abnormal in that department.
No I'm not. Most people would accept that one's sexuality is determined by who they're attracted to, not who they have sex with.
Define "most people". Most people in the U.K.? Most people in the western world? Most people in the northern hemispere? What? And you haven't interacted with many people.
Last edited by Ragtime on 12 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
12 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:09 pm
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
And you haven't interacted with many people.
How the f**k would you know?
You should ask kosmonaut how to get around the swear filter.
12 Aug 2007, 1:11 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, we've reached page 80, and have accomplished ostensibly nothing. Congrats all around.
Only because you're too stupid to understand what sexuality actually is.
Actually, you're the one who seems rather abnormal in that department.
No I'm not. Most people would accept that one's sexuality is determined by who they're attracted to, not who they have sex with.
Define "most people". Most people in the U.K.? Most people in the western world? Most people in the northern hemispere? What? And you haven't interacted with many people.
How about Professionals, Scientists, Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Sexologists? I believe most of sexologists or very likely all of them in the world agree with it.
Last edited by greenblue on 12 Aug 2007, 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
12 Aug 2007, 1:11 pm
jfrmeister wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
And you haven't interacted with many people.
How the f**k would you know?
You should ask kosmonaut how to get around the swear filter.
I know how to get around it. I don't see the point though, it just means I'm more likely to have my post deleted. I don't need to ask anyone how though, I know how to do it lol
12 Aug 2007, 1:13 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:15 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, we've reached page 80, and have accomplished ostensibly nothing. Congrats all around.
Only because you're too stupid to understand what sexuality actually is.
Actually, you're the one who seems rather abnormal in that department.
No I'm not. Most people would accept that one's sexuality is determined by who they're attracted to, not who they have sex with.
Define "most people". Most people in the U.K.? Most people in the western world? Most people in the northern hemispere? What? And you haven't interacted with many people.
I'm very sure the majority of members here on WP disagree with you.
12 Aug 2007, 1:16 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
What about touching? I don't know what you define as "romantic".
I wouldn't touch anyone who was just a friend.
What about in a relationship?
I would touch someone if they were my girlfriend. This isn't about me though.
Let me share a little secret with you. There's no such thing as sexual or tactile love. You can love someone with all your heart, and not desire to touch them or have sex with them. Conversely, you can have no real emotions for someone, and touch them or have sex with them just because of mutual physical desire, which is not love. So if you desire to touch your girlfriend, that's not love, that's tactile desire, toward physical and/or emotional pleasure, which MANY people do without having love.
So, being gay has nothing to do with actual love. Gay and straight are physical preferences. People aren't male and female at their very core -- they're simply people. So, when you desire one gender over another, that's a physical desire, apart from the love for someone.
I know that. I love my family but I don't touch them. Similarly there are people I don't love who I would touch. I'm not thick.
Gender is different to sex. I'm physically attracted to females and emotionally attracted to women. So together, that's more than just sex.
12 Aug 2007, 1:19 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:21 pm
12 Aug 2007, 1:22 pm
greenblue wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Well, we've reached page 80, and have accomplished ostensibly nothing. Congrats all around.
Only because you're too stupid to understand what sexuality actually is.
Actually, you're the one who seems rather abnormal in that department.
No I'm not. Most people would accept that one's sexuality is determined by who they're attracted to, not who they have sex with.
Define "most people". Most people in the U.K.? Most people in the western world? Most people in the northern hemispere? What? And you haven't interacted with many people.
How about Professionals, Scientists, Doctors, Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Sexologists? I believe most of sexologists or very likely all of them in the world agree with it.
Well, I don't trust the opinions of "sexologists". Sex and moral issues go hand-in-hand, and their "morality" definitions vary widely from the Bible's.
12 Aug 2007, 1:22 pm
