Raising the Debt Ceiling
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,667
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
marshall wrote:
Both of you are delusional.
Me? Delusional?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
No, I was referring to the conspiratorial nonsense from Inuyasha and iamnotaparakeet.
That's not conspiracy, that's political games. A form of campaigning while in office.
So you seriously believe Democrats want to make the economy worse so that more people will be dependent on welfare? That's just delusional as a worse economy actually benefits Republicans these days with a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Not Democrat voters, but those career politicians are set to benefit from it. A worse economy means more people in need of necessities and the politicians offer welfare in their campaign promises ad naseum. Do you not understand this or can you not?
I'm not talking about voters either. I understand your argument and it is a delusional right-wing hyper-partisan meme. This economy is NOT helping Democratic politicians. People would prefer to be able to support themselves on an honest living wage, not be forced to barely scrape by on the government dole.
Sorry, that you find the truth to be delusional.
Fact of the matter is, all I've seen from you and others thus far on this topic are just DNC talking points.
For starters Bush's Medicare part D actually cost less than estimated and definately doesn't cost $2 trillion+ like Obamascam.
And it can be argued is that all your repeating is Glenn Beck's inane, paranoid ramblings.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
marshall wrote:
Both of you are delusional.
Me? Delusional?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
No, I was referring to the conspiratorial nonsense from Inuyasha and iamnotaparakeet.
That's not conspiracy, that's political games. A form of campaigning while in office.
So you seriously believe Democrats want to make the economy worse so that more people will be dependent on welfare? That's just delusional as a worse economy actually benefits Republicans these days with a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Not Democrat voters, but those career politicians are set to benefit from it. A worse economy means more people in need of necessities and the politicians offer welfare in their campaign promises ad naseum. Do you not understand this or can you not?
I'm not talking about voters either. I understand your argument and it is a delusional right-wing hyper-partisan meme. This economy is NOT helping Democratic politicians. People would prefer to be able to support themselves on an honest living wage, not be forced to barely scrape by on the government dole.
Sorry, that you find the truth to be delusional.
Fact of the matter is, all I've seen from you and others thus far on this topic are just DNC talking points.
For starters Bush's Medicare part D actually cost less than estimated and definately doesn't cost $2 trillion+ like Obamascam.
And it can be argued is that all your repeating is Glenn Beck's inane, paranoid ramblings.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
And it can be argued that you're acting like an ostrich, burying your head in the sand.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,667
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
Inuyasha wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
marshall wrote:
Both of you are delusional.
Me? Delusional?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
No, I was referring to the conspiratorial nonsense from Inuyasha and iamnotaparakeet.
That's not conspiracy, that's political games. A form of campaigning while in office.
So you seriously believe Democrats want to make the economy worse so that more people will be dependent on welfare? That's just delusional as a worse economy actually benefits Republicans these days with a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Not Democrat voters, but those career politicians are set to benefit from it. A worse economy means more people in need of necessities and the politicians offer welfare in their campaign promises ad naseum. Do you not understand this or can you not?
I'm not talking about voters either. I understand your argument and it is a delusional right-wing hyper-partisan meme. This economy is NOT helping Democratic politicians. People would prefer to be able to support themselves on an honest living wage, not be forced to barely scrape by on the government dole.
Sorry, that you find the truth to be delusional.
Fact of the matter is, all I've seen from you and others thus far on this topic are just DNC talking points.
For starters Bush's Medicare part D actually cost less than estimated and definately doesn't cost $2 trillion+ like Obamascam.
And it can be argued is that all your repeating is Glenn Beck's inane, paranoid ramblings.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
And it can be argued that you're acting like an ostrich, burying your head in the sand.
No, I'm a guy who knows that no one in their right mind wants the economy to go down the drain for political gain. Unfortunately, the right wing of the Republican party isn't in their right mind at the moment.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
iamnotaparakeet wrote:
marshall wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
marshall wrote:
Both of you are delusional.
Me? Delusional?
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
No, I was referring to the conspiratorial nonsense from Inuyasha and iamnotaparakeet.
That's not conspiracy, that's political games. A form of campaigning while in office.
So you seriously believe Democrats want to make the economy worse so that more people will be dependent on welfare? That's just delusional as a worse economy actually benefits Republicans these days with a Democrat in the Oval Office.
Not Democrat voters, but those career politicians are set to benefit from it. A worse economy means more people in need of necessities and the politicians offer welfare in their campaign promises ad naseum. Do you not understand this or can you not?
I'm not talking about voters either. I understand your argument and it is a delusional right-wing hyper-partisan meme. This economy is NOT helping Democratic politicians. People would prefer to be able to support themselves on an honest living wage, not be forced to barely scrape by on the government dole.
Sorry, that you find the truth to be delusional.
Fact of the matter is, all I've seen from you and others thus far on this topic are just DNC talking points.
I'm rubber you're glue.
blauSamstag wrote:
number5 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
LKL wrote:
the chickens of a dumbed-down American education system that quit attempting to teach critical thought for fear that it would offend the religious are finally coming home to roost in an American population that believes right-wingers who spout faith-based economics. We may, finally, have dumbed ourselves down to death (or at least international irrelevance, after one last grand dump in the global living room).
Some on the left believe we can spend ourselves to prosperity and happiness with our credit shot to bits.
ruveyn
But the majority of this "spending" has been on huge tax cuts and unfunded wars promoted and passed by republicans.
And the medicare prescription drug program, which costs far more than 'obamacare', and was promoted and passed by republicans.
And people wonder why I was suspicious of Obamacare from the day it was proposed.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I find it ironic how people oppose the repeal of Obamacare because, in part, it addresses a hole in coverage of Medicare Part D...a program soundly criticized as being a win/win for Big Pharma and not Medicare enrollees.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Both should be repealed as bad law. What was needed is not what was given.
Kraichgauer
Veteran
![User avatar](./images/avatars/gallery/Assorted/spiderman20.gif)
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,667
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
zer0netgain wrote:
blauSamstag wrote:
number5 wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
LKL wrote:
the chickens of a dumbed-down American education system that quit attempting to teach critical thought for fear that it would offend the religious are finally coming home to roost in an American population that believes right-wingers who spout faith-based economics. We may, finally, have dumbed ourselves down to death (or at least international irrelevance, after one last grand dump in the global living room).
Some on the left believe we can spend ourselves to prosperity and happiness with our credit shot to bits.
ruveyn
But the majority of this "spending" has been on huge tax cuts and unfunded wars promoted and passed by republicans.
And the medicare prescription drug program, which costs far more than 'obamacare', and was promoted and passed by republicans.
And people wonder why I was suspicious of Obamacare from the day it was proposed.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
I find it ironic how people oppose the repeal of Obamacare because, in part, it addresses a hole in coverage of Medicare Part D...a program soundly criticized as being a win/win for Big Pharma and not Medicare enrollees.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Both should be repealed as bad law. What was needed is not what was given.
What's needed is the universal health care that the rest of western civilization has.
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer