Page 9 of 24 [ 383 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 24  Next

pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 9:58 am

Well, we do have an obesity epidemic, plus a lot of diabetes, thanks largely to the soda pop industry.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 10:02 am

Tequila wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Or, outdoors in the open air.


A town councillor in the UK is trying to ban smoking in the open air. How do you feel about that?

Town councillor Paul Bartlett wanted to ban any smoking in public in the town limits of Stony Stratford. He claimed that the reason for it was about cigarette butts and that it cost "millions" of pounds to clean up cigarette butts. When that reasoning was rubbished he used the "health" canard. He was photographed for a major newspaper with a load of cigarette butts in his hand. The photograph was taken in a completely different town ten miles away!

An esteemed UK libertarian blogger sent out an idea of meeting in Stony Stratford to protest and nearly 200 people - bloggers, commenters, smokers and non-smokers alike - to an extremely warm reception from the town's residents and the pub where the meeting was held was packed. Conservative MEP Roger Helmer and the UK Independence Party (my party - and in terms of votes was the fourth largest party in the UK at the last general election) leader Nigel Farage spoke movingly at this meeting.

Almost without exception in the town of Stony Stratford he had made himself tremendously unpopular, and a few days after this mass meeting the council had the vote on whether to ban it. Bartlett cowardly withdrew his motion for a public smoking ban, citing his 'worry' over his opponents being unprepared.

Two of the three anti-smoking motions were put before the town and were defeated by 148-2, and one of the two was the councillor himself. The very heated council meeting concluded with residents being seen angrily arguing with the councillor as they left.

So, the only time when a smoking ban has directly been put before anything like real people, it was voted against by a margin of 98.66%.

The problem isn't societal; it's political, as the above shows.


Do you have any links to the story?

How much money was the tobacco industry contributing to this cause? Very often, when we've tried to do something about smoking in the USA, through ballot measures, tobacco companies have been spending fortunes on advertising to brainwash people into voting against the effort.



b9
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Age: 52
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,003
Location: australia

23 Jul 2011, 10:06 am

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCMzjJjuxQI&feature=related[/youtube]



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 10:30 am

And, here are Winston cigarettes, being marketed to young children

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdHSIquSHMw[/youtube]



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 10:38 am

pandabear wrote:
Well, we do have an obesity epidemic.


No there aren't - some people have always been fat - many are happy about it, many aren't.

Just as we drink less in the UK than we did ten years ago.

Just like there are fewer smokers than there were ten years ago.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 10:52 am

pandabear wrote:
Do you have any links to the story?


It was on the BBC regional news - link here. It gives a reasonable one-minute run-down of what happened on the day.

I should also have mentioned that Dick Puddlecote was meant to go head-to-head in debate with Paul Bartlett on TalkSPORT (a London-based talk radio/sport station), but Bartlett chickened out and only turned up very, very late in the proceedings with anti-smoking drones (possibly ASH).

The blogger who organised it was Dick Puddlecote. Smoker Frank Davis also went.

These are real people - they have nothing to do with the tobacco industry and aren't paid a penny by them. They're just smokers who feel, rightly I would say, relentlessly shafted by the constant assault on their lifestyle choices. They're venting their fury at how they have been treated and more often than not ignored by the tobacco companies who do very little but take their money in most cases. Look them up.



Last edited by Tequila on 23 Jul 2011, 10:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 10:56 am

pandabear wrote:
And, here are Winston cigarettes, being marketed to young children

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdHSIquSHMw[/youtube]


You haven't got an argument. You're posting videos from fifty years ago.

Bigotry and spite is all you have.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

23 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm

pandabear wrote:
Well, we do have an obesity epidemic, plus a lot of diabetes, thanks largely to the soda pop industry.


No one is forcing people to drink that swill. Clean water and fruit juice are much healthier.

ruveyn



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm

ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Well, we do have an obesity epidemic, plus a lot of diabetes, thanks largely to the soda pop industry.


No one is forcing people to drink that swill. Clean water and fruit juice are much healthier.

ruveyn


I'm with you on that. My 16-year old daughter is an addict.

My wife drank sodas when we were younger, and even got me to take it up for a bit. My wife and I have been soda-free for about ten+ years, but we don't seem to be able to cure our daughter of it. She will eventually either give it up or become obese.

Fortunately, our 8-year-old was never introduced to soda, and doesn't drink it.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 3:08 pm

pandabear wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Well, we do have an obesity epidemic, plus a lot of diabetes, thanks largely to the soda pop industry.


No one is forcing people to drink that swill. Clean water and fruit juice are much healthier.

ruveyn


I'm with you on that. My 16-year old daughter is an addict.


No, perhaps she just really enjoys it.

Why is there a rush to pathologise everything these days? Some people like soda. I like orange juice and water too. People have different tastes, they mix and match.

Another example of anti-smoker bigotry here (http://taking-liberties.squarespace.com/blog/2011/7/23/snipers-could-soon-snuff-out-smoking.html).



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 5:28 pm

Tequila wrote:
pandabear wrote:
Well, we do have an obesity epidemic.


No there aren't - some people have always been fat - many are happy about it, many aren't.

Just as we drink less in the UK than we did ten years ago.

Just like there are fewer smokers than there were ten years ago.


According to our Centers for Disease Control, there is an obesity epidemic

http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/ObesityEpidemic/



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 5:30 pm

I wouldn't trust anything they say. The government claims all kinds of things, a lot of which are nonsense.



Vexcalibur
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,398

23 Jul 2011, 6:01 pm

Dox47 wrote:
I actually looked into my insurance company's actuarial tables when I started smoking cigars; their data said no detectable health impact below 2 cigars a day.


Are you sure 2 cigars a day is large? My experience with smokers is that they certainly do more than that. Else they wouldn't be so hurt about not being able to smoke at the office or in the street. 2 cigars a day is easy to accomplish at home.

Insurance companies are not so great authorities to call.


Quote:
I really have to conclude that it's all about the smell and that the health concern is just a justification for rude behavior, especially when we're talking about well ventilated outside areas. Being me, I've taken to open carrying while smoking in public, and have noticed a dramatic increase in politeness in my immediate vicinity as a result... :lol:


It does not matter if it is "just for the smoke". It still harms people's health and thus no one is entitled to public smoking , regardless of the true intentions of the opponents.

Spreading stinky unpleasant smell for pleasure is considered rude.


_________________
.


Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm

I would certainly think about smoking cigars if I managed to get into them in some way, say by trying them abroad. Could go well with a nice imperial stout.



pandabear
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2007
Age: 65
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,402

23 Jul 2011, 6:15 pm

Tequila wrote:
Quote:
My 16-year old daughter is an addict.


No, perhaps she just really enjoys it.

Why is there a rush to pathologise everything these days? Some people like soda. I like orange juice and water too. People have different tastes, they mix and match.


Why do you think the corporations put caffeine in the soda pop? To make it addictive, of course.

Quote:


Singapore seems to be doing the best job against smoking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoking_in_Singapore

They have a proposal to make it illegal to sell cigarettes to anyone born after 2000, which should gradually make the country tobacco-free.

http://www.tobaccofreesingapore.info/



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

23 Jul 2011, 6:56 pm

pandabear wrote:
Why do you think the corporations put caffeine in the soda pop? To make it addictive, of course.


I drank caffeine every day in one point in the not-too-distant past. Usually two to four shots of espresso per day. Sometimes more like 12 shots per day. That amount of caffeine wouldn't have done me any good probably but it wouldn't have killed me. Was I addicted? No, because I found it easy to quit. I haven't touched espresso in six months. I sometimes buy a milk-based drink that contains caffeine in Lidl and I fairly often drink cola drinks that contain caffeine, but not nearly to the extent that I was drinking it.

Quote:
Singapore seems to be doing the best job against smoking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoking_in_Singapore

They have a proposal to make it illegal to sell cigarettes to anyone born after 2000, which should gradually make the country tobacco-free.

http://www.tobaccofreesingapore.info/


Try Bhutan. Smoking is illegal there - you'd love the place, so you would.

In countries that aren't authoritarian dictatorships such bans will never work. Why? Because people will pay criminals for what they enjoy or grow/produce their own. Prohibition 101: the cure is worse than the disease.

No-one is forcing the beer down my neck. No-one is forcing smokers to enjoy a lovely fag after a meal. No-one is forcing people to drink cola. And no-one forced me into drinking caffeine. That people claim that this occurs is in large part an abdication of personal responsibility.

Now, where's the rest of that glass of stout? ;)