snapcap wrote:
ValentineWiggin wrote:
I'm still waiting for reasoning as to why I can't disbelieve two opposite, unevidenced assertions simultaneously.
Hint:
Repeating ad nauseum that I only "believe" that I disbelieve isn't reasoning.
You can believe that you can't,
Exhibit A.
snapcap wrote:
but it does bother me that you tell me that you have the same position as a brick.
Reasoned skepticism is hardly comparable to lacking sentience, but okay.
snapcap wrote:
You're an atheist because you've heard of the concept of God, and you believe it to be bologna because you feel the concept is lacking.
Here, here. That DOESN'T mean I believe that god doesn't exist, though.
snapcap wrote:
You're not an atheist because you lack the concept of God to consider.
No, I know of the concept, and I reject that it's veracious, just like I reject the claim that no gods exist. Both are equally non-evidenced.
_________________
"Such is the Frailty
of the human Heart, that very few Men, who have no Property, have any Judgment of their own.
They talk and vote as they are directed by Some Man of Property, who has attached their Minds
to his Interest."