What would be a good holiday for atheists?
Here in the US, we now celebrate "President's Day" which combines the celebration of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. I would call it "Scientific Progress Day." I would celebrate it on the birthday of Galileo. As you all no doubt know, he suffered at the hands of the religious authorities because he publicized his scientific discoveries.
Yes he did and Galileo Galilei was Catholic oh the irony being presecuted by his own religious kind.
You have to wonder if he still believed in the Catholic faith after going through all that. Of course, he would tend to keep such amended beliefs to himself. I think this was around the time of the Inquisition.
Atheists have no message to spread. Atheism is a lack of a certain kind of belief, not a positive assertion of a belief.
There are no celebrations or rituals associated with atheism.
ruveyn
Atheists lack the belief in God but they still believe that God doesn't exist.
Atheist's don't have any strict doctrine they all abide by, as each has their reason for believing God isn't real, but some do like to parade their belief around the holidays. Atheists like Alain de Botton would like to do more.
_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*
some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"
Two cheers for Einstein's Birthday. No cheers for Carl Sagan's birthday.
ruveyn
I am a huge fan of Albert Einstein. Also how about a Charles Darwin day after all he is the one that came up with Evolution.
I am a fan of Einstein too. A "Scientific Progress Day" would be a holiday I could really support. One way to celebrate it would be to go "Amish" for a day. Don't use any modern technology. It would help anyone who tries it to appreciate what science and technology does for us.
Last edited by Rocky on 21 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Here in the US, we now celebrate "President's Day" which combines the celebration of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. I would call it "Scientific Progress Day." I would celebrate it on the birthday of Galileo. As you all no doubt know, he suffered at the hands of the religious authorities because he publicized his scientific discoveries.
Yes he did and Galileo Galilei was Catholic oh the irony being presecuted by his own religious kind.
You have to wonder if he still believed in the Catholic faith after going through all that. Of course, he would tend to keep such amended beliefs to himself. I think this was around the time of the Inquisition.
After reading so many books about his life he kept his religion and sceintific research seperate. The Inquistion was a Catholic doing the prostestants that being my kind also suffered at their hands.
A lot of proestants are scienitists the methodist church is known for contribuitnig to science in it's church history. Proestants get along very well with non theists because we can simply talk about science my preacher is a fan of scienece.
Here in the US, we now celebrate "President's Day" which combines the celebration of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. I would call it "Scientific Progress Day." I would celebrate it on the birthday of Galileo. As you all no doubt know, he suffered at the hands of the religious authorities because he publicized his scientific discoveries.
Yes he did and Galileo Galilei was Catholic oh the irony being presecuted by his own religious kind.
You have to wonder if he still believed in the Catholic faith after going through all that. Of course, he would tend to keep such amended beliefs to himself. I think this was around the time of the Inquisition.
After reading so many books about his life he kept his religion and sceintific research seperate. The Inquistion was a Catholic doing the prostestants that being my kind also suffered at their hands.
A lot of proestants are scienitists the methodist church is known for contribuitnig to science in it's church history. Proestants get along very well with non theists because we can simply talk about science my preacher is a fan of scienece.
I know that there are many scientists who are religious. I suspect that they believe in evolution instead of being a young earth creationist. The most secular (so to speak) religion that I know of in the west is Unitarian Universalist. Some people still want to attend church. Others, who have become atheists, are gathering at events promoted by various atheist groups, as found on meetup,com for example.
also you still dont seem to see that the whole point of being an atheist is that you excactly dont belong to a coherent societal group as such,
Not so. There are organizations centered around professional interests, social or political causes, sports, community interests and various volunteer groups. We don't need no steeeenking religion to have some causes in common with other folks.
ruveyn
Who is we? If people did have those things to hold them together, wouldn't it have happened? Even if they did have some of those things in common, they aren't strong enough to do the job, not like religion has. They could someday, but today is not that day.
You can't say some arbitrary thing could fill the void of religion missing from holding things together. You could just say, "Hey, you have five fingers too, we should stick together, brother."
_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*
some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Here in the US, we now celebrate "President's Day" which combines the celebration of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. I would call it "Scientific Progress Day." I would celebrate it on the birthday of Galileo. As you all no doubt know, he suffered at the hands of the religious authorities because he publicized his scientific discoveries.
Yes he did and Galileo Galilei was Catholic oh the irony being presecuted by his own religious kind.
You have to wonder if he still believed in the Catholic faith after going through all that. Of course, he would tend to keep such amended beliefs to himself. I think this was around the time of the Inquisition.
After reading so many books about his life he kept his religion and sceintific research seperate. The Inquistion was a Catholic doing the prostestants that being my kind also suffered at their hands.
A lot of proestants are scienitists the methodist church is known for contribuitnig to science in it's church history. Proestants get along very well with non theists because we can simply talk about science my preacher is a fan of scienece.
I know that there are many scientists who are religious. I suspect that they believe in evolution instead of being a young earth creationist. The most secular (so to speak) religion that I know of in the west is Unitarian Universalist. Some people still want to attend church. Others, who have become atheists, are gathering at events promoted by various atheist groups, as found on meetup,com for example.
Oh yes that is true modern Jewish people only follow Judaism because of their culture not a religious reason. Christian can be secular to I am when I say I am secualr I mean that I follow my religion but I do not let it keep me from studying things like science. Max Planck was a proestant and he invented the Quanta.
also you still dont seem to see that the whole point of being an atheist is that you excactly dont belong to a coherent societal group as such,
Not so. There are organizations centered around professional interests, social or political causes, sports, community interests and various volunteer groups. We don't need no steeeenking religion to have some causes in common with other folks.
ruveyn
Who is we? If people did have those things to hold them together, wouldn't it have happened? Even if they did have some of those things in common, they aren't strong enough to do the job, not like religion has. They could someday, but today is not that day.
You can't say some arbitrary thing could fill the void of religion missing from holding things together. You could just say, "Hey, you have five fingers too, we should stick together, brother."
If you are saying that there are no organizations based on not believing in any gods, you will discover with a Google search that you are wrong. Religious people are anything but unified into a single organization. How many different religions are there?
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
also you still dont seem to see that the whole point of being an atheist is that you excactly dont belong to a coherent societal group as such,
Not so. There are organizations centered around professional interests, social or political causes, sports, community interests and various volunteer groups. We don't need no steeeenking religion to have some causes in common with other folks.
ruveyn
Who is we? If people did have those things to hold them together, wouldn't it have happened? Even if they did have some of those things in common, they aren't strong enough to do the job, not like religion has. They could someday, but today is not that day.
You can't say some arbitrary thing could fill the void of religion missing from holding things together. You could just say, "Hey, you have five fingers too, we should stick together, brother."
If you are saying that there are no organizations based on not believing in any gods, you will discover with a Google search that you are wrong. Religious people are anything but unified into a single organization. How many different religions are there?
Some religions have God they whorship other religions are viewed as a priactice with out a God they whorship as a group.
also you still dont seem to see that the whole point of being an atheist is that you excactly dont belong to a coherent societal group as such,
Not so. There are organizations centered around professional interests, social or political causes, sports, community interests and various volunteer groups. We don't need no steeeenking religion to have some causes in common with other folks.
ruveyn
Who is we? If people did have those things to hold them together, wouldn't it have happened? Even if they did have some of those things in common, they aren't strong enough to do the job, not like religion has. They could someday, but today is not that day.
You can't say some arbitrary thing could fill the void of religion missing from holding things together. You could just say, "Hey, you have five fingers too, we should stick together, brother."
If you are saying that there are no organizations based on not believing in any gods, you will discover with a Google search that you are wrong. Religious people are anything but unified into a single organization. How many different religions are there?
Some religions have God they whorship other religions are viewed as a priactice with out a God they whorship as a group.
I understand that there are some religions without a god. Buddhism is one example. I was referring to the majority of religions based on the belief in a god (or gods.)
If you are saying that there are no organizations based on not believing in any gods, you will discover with a Google search that you are wrong. Religious people are anything but unified into a single organization. How many different religions are there?
I'm not saying there aren't, but it's not enough.
I'm going to take your advice and look it up really quick.
First Church
of
Atheism
Hmm, I just might have to get ordained. Many atheists are unaware of what atheism really is, and I'd like to spread the message in our special gathering place via skype.
Now if only I could get some cash to get me motivated to start, any givers? All donor will receive a stamped envelop for your good deed. S&H will apply in all cases.
After my first $5,000, I will consider a face to face meeting in front of my local public library, in front of the security cameras.
_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*
some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"
Last edited by snapcap on 21 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
also you still dont seem to see that the whole point of being an atheist is that you excactly dont belong to a coherent societal group as such,
Not so. There are organizations centered around professional interests, social or political causes, sports, community interests and various volunteer groups. We don't need no steeeenking religion to have some causes in common with other folks.
ruveyn
Who is we? If people did have those things to hold them together, wouldn't it have happened? Even if they did have some of those things in common, they aren't strong enough to do the job, not like religion has. They could someday, but today is not that day.
You can't say some arbitrary thing could fill the void of religion missing from holding things together. You could just say, "Hey, you have five fingers too, we should stick together, brother."
If you are saying that there are no organizations based on not believing in any gods, you will discover with a Google search that you are wrong. Religious people are anything but unified into a single organization. How many different religions are there?
Some religions have God they whorship other religions are viewed as a priactice with out a God they whorship as a group.
I understand that there are some religions without a god. Buddhism is one example. I was referring to the majority of religions based on the belief in a god (or gods.)
Some religions that have belief in just God are Jewish Muslim and Christian the others have more then one God they whorship Hindus have a lot of Gods they pray to.
Two cheers for Einstein's Birthday. No cheers for Carl Sagan's birthday.
ruveyn
I am a huge fan of Albert Einstein. Also how about a Charles Darwin day after all he is the one that came up with Evolution.
Alfred Wallace also came up with the same theory. In fact, if Wallace had not communicated with Darwin that he (Wallace) was going to publish soon, Darwin would not have published Origin of Species while he was alive.
ruveyn
Joker
Veteran
Joined: 19 Mar 2011
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,593
Location: North Carolina The Tar Heel State :)
Two cheers for Einstein's Birthday. No cheers for Carl Sagan's birthday.
ruveyn
I am a huge fan of Albert Einstein. Also how about a Charles Darwin day after all he is the one that came up with Evolution.
Alfred Wallace also came up with the same theory. In fact, if Wallace had not communicated with Darwin that he (Wallace) was going to publish soon, Darwin would not have published Origin of Species while he was alive.
ruveyn
Hmm I have never heard that befor I thought it was all Charles Darwins theory never knew some one else came up with the same theory.....so Darwin and Alfred both deserve credit for a theory that has yet to be disprooven interesting.
Hmm I have never heard that befor I thought it was all Charles Darwins theory never knew some one else came up with the same theory.....so Darwin and Alfred both deserve credit for a theory that has yet to be disprooven interesting.
Both Darwin's abstract and Wallace's papers were read in front of the scientific society of naturalists. Neither was present when the abstracts were read. The papers did not make all that much of a splash, but Darwin''s book "Origin of Species" sold out very quickly on the first printing and several other printing sold out rapidly.
ruveyn
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
How to write a holiday rom-com for TV |
18 Dec 2024, 9:33 pm |
2024 Holiday Budget??? |
27 Dec 2024, 11:20 pm |
Holiday gatherings and feeling out of sorts |
27 Dec 2024, 11:43 am |
Good news
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
26 Jan 2025, 6:49 pm |