AngelRho wrote:
You cannot make a truth claim without accepting something on pure faith.
<learning mode activated>
OK,
I haven't studied this area and I am willing to listen with a neutral manner/mindset.
Let's first define what you mean by "pure faith".
Explain the context of your statement.
Is "pure faith" and "confidence" based on metacognition and experience, interchangeable?
If not, why is "confidence" not sufficient?
Are you adding an element of divinity when you use the term?
<Pauline Hanson mode activated>
"Please explain."
I am not a fan of grand posts.
I prefer "bite-size".
I luv the concept of "conciseness" to begin with.
Autistics tend to think much more deeply that NTs but at a cost of cerebral energy,
So I will leave it here for the time being.
Hope to hear from you soon, cobber.
P.S.
"Size" is not everything/k.
P.P.S.
I am resetting the conversation.