AspE wrote:
It's not necessarily racist to vote for (or against) someone because of their race. If you are a member of the same race, then that candidate is more likely to represent your own views. There is a difference between a preference and a racist. Most people seek partners of their own race, that's not racist, that's preference. Is it also racist to have black people running the NAACP? No, those are the people that know the most about black issues.
If you're voting for a politician who will influence the lives of all people in the region irrespective of their race, then yes, voting on the basis of their race because you expect them to be partial to you as a result of having similar interests due to racial cohesion, then yes, that's racist not just a preference. It's racist because instead of taking a look at the specific issues and deciding which you feel are most important to everyone and how the majority of people will be affected (positively or negatively by the candidate's actions, you've instead chosen to go with "issues of importance to my race are the only ones that matter, everyone else can kiss off". This is not comparable to heading the NAACP, which absolutely should be headed up by black people, because that organization serves the black community specifically. That's not true of political offices, particularly high political offices like the presidency - they affect everyone.
Political offices do affect everyone, but no one is under any obligation to be concerned about the community in general. I could vote for someone because I like their name. If all I care about is "black" issues, and I think Obama will be more understanding of them due to his race, it's not racist to vote for him for that reason. It's a preference. If you vote for the black guy because you think all white people are corrupt due to their race, then that is racist. It's not racist to think that a black guy will better represent you (regardless of their actual positions). Positions on the issues aren't everything. Many people felt that Clinton would be better for women, even though Obama's positions with regard to women are probably identical. That's not sexist.