Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
LKL wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
What if the woman is the rapist and she gets pregnent, does she still have a say over what happens to the kid or should the rape victim be the one that decides?
A rapist should never have custody over a child once it's born, but even death row inmates cannot be compelled to donate parts of their body to other people; even a female rapist should be compelled bu the state to donate her body to a zef if she doesn't want to.
So in other words you're suggesting that a female rapist has the right to kill the child that results from her having committed a crime, seems more than a little sexist don't you think.
No, I'm saying that a female rapist has the same rights as a male rapist: the right to not be forced to donate any part of their body to anyone else for any reason. If you think that we should start harvesting organs from male rapists - say, individual kidneys, chunks of lung, chunks of liver - things that will impair them and scar them for life, but that they can live without, and which some other
innocent person out there
cannot life without - then maybe we can start talking about forcing female rapists to have to donate their bodies, too. Think of all of the lives that could be saved with a forced organ donor pool!
(/sarcasm)
What if the male rape victim doesn't want the child killed? The woman was the rapist in this case and pregnency isn't like organ donation because in organ donations the organs are actually permanently removed, pregnency only lasts about 9 months right, you're giving a false equivalency.
Doesn't matter if the father wants to keep the kid until androbot's fantasy comes true and the zef can be transferred to his body. Also, organ donation is a good comparison because pregnancy has permanent, sometimes debilitiating, effects on a woman's body as well as being more painful and detrimental to health for 9 months than organ donation.
'Yasha, this is something that has come up in debates with you before; you seem to have this idea that pregnancy is a minor inconvenience and that once the kid is born, the woman can just go on with her life as though nothing has happened. That's not the case. As I have already mentioned twice in this thread, abortion has 1/10 the rate of fatalities as childbirth
in the United States, today, and an even greater reduction in co-morbidities.
No one can use another person's body against their will. Not even if that person is a rapist or murderer, not even if they will die without it. It really is as simple as that.