Nobody interested in the Russia-Ukraine conflict?
https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releas ... cords-2021
Yes, China and the United States have always been important trading partners in soybeans - accounting for 34.4% of China's total soybean imports and about 60% of the total U.S. soybean exports.
Sadly 41% of US farmland is used to produce meat, primarily beef and primarily factory produced food such as "fast food". If that land was used to produce wheat and soybeans, there would be no food crisis in Europe or elsewhere.
It is unrealistic to require farmland holders to select crops according to the needs of food security - usually only based on income.
I would not say that Americans have a special obligation on this issue.
In the late Qing Dynasty, the government encouraged farmers to grow opium to prevent the outflow of silver, which was undoubtedly responsible for the famine in the country.
I suspect that this dynamic continues in some parts of the world today.
"Fast food" is at least "food"
Fast food is food but it's a very inefficient way to distribute calories when there is a food crisis. The American obligation is that the US has a huge amount of arable land, comparable to China but with a fraction of the population. I don't think it inappropriate, in wartime, for farmers to be obliged to plant crops in accordance with the requirements of fighting that war. In exchange for that support, I believe those farmers are entitled to compensation taken from the majority of us who aren't farmers. This is what happened during WWII. The fact that it's not happening today is a big part of why the US is no longer viewed as a reliable ally.
We don't have food crisis here, Europe is food-secure.
We fear effects of food crisis in Middle East and parts of Africa, desert, often poor and unstable countries that rely on food imports. With Ukrainian ports blocked, Russia can use wheat to either simply cause unrest and despair or to force policies in exchange for food.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
We fear effects of food crisis in Middle East and parts of Africa, desert, often poor and unstable countries that rely on food imports. With Ukrainian ports blocked, Russia can use wheat to either simply cause unrest and despair or to force policies in exchange for food.
Not that it was so intended, but I don't think this contradicts what I said in my previous comment.
Farmers are not rich. Most grow or produce what will make them the most money. As prices go up and certain commodities become more scarce, farmers may decide to change course for next growing season. Governments can help not by requiring farmers to grow particular crops but by offering subsidies or tax relief if they grow that which is most necessary.
^^^https://wrongplanet.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=403880&&start=1312#p9051983
I will quote this again.
Egypt to receive wheat shipments from Ukraine by rail from Poland
_________________
With the help of translation software.
Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.
You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
I will quote this again.
Egypt to receive wheat shipments from Ukraine by rail from Poland
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Either way it's government spending in support of policy.
I will quote this again.
Egypt to receive wheat shipments from Ukraine by rail from Poland
Awesome! You guys are really facing the challenges with action!
Either way it's government spending in support of policy.
Freedom of choice is still there.
https://www.politico.eu/article/poland- ... ke-months/
While we're doing what we can to improve logistics, financial aid with such projects would be most welcome, as our economy is already very stressed and the importers aren't rich either.
Luckily, we're a resilient society here, we'll survive the crisis. But at some point, things become simply unaffordable on our own, especially with our financially inept government.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
https://www.politico.eu/article/poland- ... ke-months/
While we're doing what we can to improve logistics, financial aid with such projects would be most welcome, as our economy is already very stressed and the importers aren't rich either.
Luckily, we're a resilient society here, we'll survive the crisis. But at some point, things become simply unaffordable on our own, especially with our financially inept government.
Bear in mind that most of us seem to blame Biden for our relatively mild economic woes and seem to care more about stripping him of power than about anything happening in Eastern Europe.
Some things may not be solved by increasing calorie production in the United States——
India exports food while millions starve
There can be nothing more criminal for any hungry nation to export its staple food. It is the primary responsibility of the government, as enshrined in the Directive Principles, to ensure that every citizen is well-fed. Unfortunately what is not being realised is the declining fall in per capita availability of foodgrains matches the availability at the time of Bengal famine in 1943. Isn’t it sad that even after 70 years of Bengal famine, we still live in the shadow of hunger and starvation? How can any sensible nation therefore justify food exports?
Food management essentially means distributing the available foodgrains among the poor and hungry. Export of staple foods therefore must be immediately stopped, and all out efforts have to be made to take the foodgrains to the doors of the hungry millions. This is the primary responsibility of every government.
2012 report. The situation remains unchanged.
A country worse than North Korea in terms of hunger is exporting a lot of staple food.
However, more grain circulating in the international market may make India's exports more unprofitable, forcing them to provide more food to their citizens. But can this really change the fundamental problem?
_________________
With the help of translation software.
Cover your eyes, if you like. It will serve no purpose.
You might expect to be able to crush them in your hand, into wolf-bone fragments.
Either way it's government spending in support of policy.
Freedom of choice is still there.
Unless the government sends troops in on black helicopters to arrest property owners and seize their property, yes. But in wartime there are other things at least as important as freedom of choice.
And when has that happened in the US?
Subsidies or tax breaks would most likely appeal to small farmers struggling to make ends meet. Larger farmers will most likely go with what makes them the most money. Seizing propery was not even suggested and probably would be unconstitutional.
India exports food while millions starve
There can be nothing more criminal for any hungry nation to export its staple food. It is the primary responsibility of the government, as enshrined in the Directive Principles, to ensure that every citizen is well-fed. Unfortunately what is not being realised is the declining fall in per capita availability of foodgrains matches the availability at the time of Bengal famine in 1943. Isn’t it sad that even after 70 years of Bengal famine, we still live in the shadow of hunger and starvation? How can any sensible nation therefore justify food exports?
Food management essentially means distributing the available foodgrains among the poor and hungry. Export of staple foods therefore must be immediately stopped, and all out efforts have to be made to take the foodgrains to the doors of the hungry millions. This is the primary responsibility of every government.
2012 report. The situation remains unchanged.
A country worse than North Korea in terms of hunger is exporting a lot of staple food.
However, more grain circulating in the international market may make India's exports more unprofitable, forcing them to provide more food to their citizens. But can this really change the fundamental problem?
This year, India has banned food exports.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-61590756
It seems they are open to making exceptions to this ban, though.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
We prefer to fight this war with money, logistics and diplomacy because the option of fighting it with blood is a very real possibility here. And that would cost us way more than any sanctions and aid ever could.
_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.
<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
NATO involvement in Ukraine |
03 Jan 2025, 4:16 pm |
Moving to Russia Early Next Year |
20 Dec 2024, 11:58 am |
Moving to Russia to Find Work |
09 Jan 2025, 1:00 pm |
Dispelling Zionist Propaganda Against Russia |
31 Dec 2024, 4:25 pm |