Page 10 of 23 [ 357 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 23  Next

Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

12 Apr 2011, 9:07 am

number5 wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Your "rights" end where my wallet begins.


How do you justify the arrogance of thinking that your own personal preferences should dictate policy for the entire country? I do not agree with our military spending or our presence in I don't even know how many countries (I think it's around 150 countries), but I don't recall having an opt-out box on my tax return.


It really serves to show how deeply-ingrained is the concept of private property,
when such a "right" is literally more important than someone else's life.


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

12 Apr 2011, 9:18 am

You have Robert Nozick to thank for that, he was one of the american philosophers who was against Rawls and his principle of equal chances (ow, memory is being more or less correct, feel free to correct me <.<). I reckon he was the one who said that the state shouldn't have to tell you what you can do with your own body, such as prostitution. In the same line of thought*, he'd say that the state can't force you to jeopardize your life if someone is drowning, for example. among other examples, that the state couldn't force you to wear a helmet when you're riding a bicycle or a motorcycle. :roll:

* : edited



number5
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,691
Location: sunny philadelphia

12 Apr 2011, 9:23 am

Bethie wrote:
number5 wrote:
zer0netgain wrote:
Your "rights" end where my wallet begins.


How do you justify the arrogance of thinking that your own personal preferences should dictate policy for the entire country? I do not agree with our military spending or our presence in I don't even know how many countries (I think it's around 150 countries), but I don't recall having an opt-out box on my tax return.


It really serves to show how deeply-ingrained is the concept of private property,
when such a "right" is literally more important than someone else's life.


One Nation Under Money :(



LibertarianAS
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115
Location: Norfolk, US

12 Apr 2011, 9:30 am

I have mixed feeling about abortion much like i have mixed feeling about the death penalty

from one hand i think government should not intervene,because government shouldn't exist(except to protect life and property)

on the other hand I like the idea of punishment for a stupid wacko who let's someone cum in her vagina without contraception



Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

12 Apr 2011, 9:32 am

LibertarianAS wrote:

on the other hand I like the idea of punishment for a stupid wacko who let's someone cum in her vagina without contraception


Wow. That's interesting...state-mandated pregnancy and childbirth as punishment for forgetting my pill. 8O


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


BurntOutMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Mar 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 502
Location: Oregon, USA

12 Apr 2011, 9:37 am

Bethie wrote:
LibertarianAS wrote:

on the other hand I like the idea of punishment for a stupid wacko who let's someone cum in her vagina without contraception


Wow. That's interesting...state-mandated pregnancy and childbirth as punishment for forgetting my pill. 8O



I have to say I never understood the whole "You do the crime, you do the time" consequence for pregnancy. It doesn't seem to really consider the "child" at all.



Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

12 Apr 2011, 9:42 am

BurntOutMom wrote:
Bethie wrote:
LibertarianAS wrote:

on the other hand I like the idea of punishment for a stupid wacko who let's someone cum in her vagina without contraception


Wow. That's interesting...state-mandated pregnancy and childbirth as punishment for forgetting my pill. 8O



I have to say I never understood the whole "You do the crime, you do the time" consequence for pregnancy. It doesn't seem to really consider the "child" at all.


It's simply the most blatant way to express the "reason" to oppose abortion rights:
we just cannot have a society where women can have consequence-free sex. :roll:


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


Inuyasha
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,745

12 Apr 2011, 9:44 am

Bethie wrote:
BurntOutMom wrote:
Bethie wrote:
LibertarianAS wrote:

on the other hand I like the idea of punishment for a stupid wacko who let's someone cum in her vagina without contraception


Wow. That's interesting...state-mandated pregnancy and childbirth as punishment for forgetting my pill. 8O



I have to say I never understood the whole "You do the crime, you do the time" consequence for pregnancy. It doesn't seem to really consider the "child" at all.


It's simply the most blatant way to express the "reason" to oppose abortion rights:
we just cannot have a society where women can have consequence-free sex. :roll:


I think both parents should be held responsible if it is not a case of rape. Both parents are responsible for the child's wellbeing, not just the mother and not just the father.



LibertarianAS
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115
Location: Norfolk, US

12 Apr 2011, 9:46 am

BurntOutMom wrote:

I have to say I never understood the whole "You do the crime, you do the time" consequence for pregnancy. It doesn't seem to really consider the "child" at all.


I don't give a f*****g f**k about a bunch of cells(the "baby")

even if the fetus was a "children"(it is not) like Rothbard said children are a mere property of their parents and they can dispose of them like they want

"But the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die."

- Murray Rothbard, The Ethics of Liberty Chapter 14 'Children and Rights'


but I like the idea of a society where people is RESPONSABLE for they f*****g mistake....you enjoyed your time without contraception and forgotting the pill? well you should be PUNISHED for this in a way or another



Last edited by LibertarianAS on 12 Apr 2011, 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

12 Apr 2011, 9:46 am

BurntOutMom wrote:
I have to say I never understood the whole "You do the crime, you do the time" consequence for pregnancy.


Someone referring to the act of sex as "the crime" is most likely someone you don't want to consult on matters relating to sex and general adult relationships and decisions.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

12 Apr 2011, 9:50 am

Inuyasha wrote:
I think both parents should be held responsible if it is not a case of rape. Both parents are responsible for the child's wellbeing, not just the mother and not just the father.


f*****g and conceiving does not make two people "parents".
A woman being forced to continue a pregnancy and give birth against her will has nothing to do with both partners- it has to do with pregnant women's indentured servitude to the state.
Mandated pregnancy and childbirth, for the "crime" most definitely constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


Last edited by Bethie on 12 Apr 2011, 10:56 am, edited 2 times in total.

Bethie
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster

12 Apr 2011, 9:51 am

LibertarianAS wrote:
you enjoyed your time without contraception and forgotting the pill? well you should be PUNISHED for this in a way or another


yeah....that's absurd. 8O


_________________
For there is another kind of violence, slower but just as deadly, destructive as the shot or the bomb in the night. This is the violence of institutions; indifference and inaction and slow decay.


HerrGrimm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: United States

12 Apr 2011, 10:05 am

Bethie wrote:
Wow. That's interesting...state-mandated pregnancy and childbirth as punishment for forgetting my pill. 8O


In Communist Romania, the law was you had to have 4 children before you could even get contraceptives, and abortions were not allowed. It led to children being put in decrepit conditions in the very infamous orphanages, so bad they were thought to have autism when they were adopted and came to the UK. They did not. It was unfathomable to me that a child would be born knowing that they would just be sent there because their parents could not take care of them.

It was not punishment for forgetting contraceptives, but they were still state-mandated pregnancies to GET contraceptives. Your statement reminded me of that. So it could be worse. I don't agree with that view at all though.


_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime


Sallamandrina
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jan 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,590

12 Apr 2011, 10:16 am

HerrGrimm, you couldn't get any contraceptives whatsoever in Communist Romania and other similar places no matter how many kids you already had.


_________________
"Selfishness is not living as one wishes to live, it is asking others to live as one wishes to live" (Oscar Wilde)


HerrGrimm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: United States

12 Apr 2011, 10:18 am

Sallamandrina wrote:
HerrGrimm, you couldn't get any contraceptives whatsoever in Communist Romania and other similar places no matter how many kids you already had.


It was four children in this story. That is what I went on.


_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime


LibertarianAS
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 115
Location: Norfolk, US

12 Apr 2011, 10:20 am

Master_Pedant wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
The lazy people on welfare lacks significant experiental qualities, is utterly dependent on another's body for life, and really does lack a lot of important human neural qualities

people on welfare ≠ person


fixed for you :D



Last edited by LibertarianAS on 12 Apr 2011, 10:22 am, edited 1 time in total.