I don't know about that, but here is a discussion about whether the poor having bigger families is a matter of choice or circumstance:
http://www.nscb.gov.ph/headlines/StatsS ... v_poor.asp
Quote:
...Many of us have friends who yearn to have apos. But not everyone is blessed with those little rascals and cutie pies to pamper. Some rich couples have waited so long, despite many trips to fertility specialists here and abroad. On the other hand, when one goes to slum areas in Metro Manila, one sees hordes of happy children playfully chasing each other, completely oblivious to the impoverished environment that encumbers their young minds.
As the powerful Catholic Church opposes nontraditional methods of contraception, population management in the Philippines has certainly been a big challenge....
... why do the poor have bigger families? Some possibilities: (1) The poor have no access to modern family planning methods. Should this be difficult for PopCom to address? (2) The poor need more children to do household chores or to help in economic activities of the family. Shouldn’t children be studying in school instead? (3)The poor are religiously guided by the Catholic Church. Does it mean that the rich do not really pray when they go to church? Susmaryosep! (4) The poor lead healthier lives. Try malunggay and ampalaya then. Also, drink plenty of water and leisurely take a healthy breakfast at home - not in the office nor in a fast food center! (5) The poor lead less stressful lives (read: the poor enjoy sex better). Workaholic couples probably find less quality time to enjoy themselves and so find it difficult to conceive. With a nagger of a biyenan to boot, how can the poor rich couples’ copulation techniques succeed? But recalling that nonrandomly selected women enjoy sex better than men, maybe, just maybe, poor men do it better than rich men? (6) The poor are less able to resist the pangangalabit ni waswit or pag-aklay ni maybahay. Because even the poorest women desire fewer children than they actually have! Or are the innocently seductive poses of the poor far more effective than branded perfume, sculpted noses and tattooed eyebrows? (7) In vitro fertilization is subprime compared to dancing in Obando. Note that we seldom see rich childless couples hying off to Bulacan. Pride prevails, maybe? The poor - they simply swing it all out when Willie wheedles, Sayaw Darling, Sayaw Darling!
Unfortunately, there are no official statistics to indicate definitively the reason why the poor are more successful in going forth to multiply! Whether they are forced by circumstances or whether theirs is an informed choice. ....
...Nonetheless, even as it has not been established beyond reasonable doubt which between poverty and family size is the cause and which is the effect, the strong correlation between the two variables is unmistakably clear. Statistics also very convincingly point to the importance of education in addressing poverty reduction and population management. This should be more than enough information to inform our decisions.
Maybe, as a US politician says, our time for change has come! PopCom, instead of spending on condoms should probably spend a big part of its budget to promote reading as a hobby, don’t you agree?....
Glosssary wrote:
apos = kid
Susmaryosep = Jesus, Mary, Joseph!
malunggay = Moringa oleifera
ampalaya = Momordica charantia
pangangalabit ni waswit = wife's seduction
pag-aklay ni maybahay = something similar to the above
Sayaw Darling, Sayaw Darling:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXzDm5GcCs8[/youtube]
In the USA, there is little incentive to have a large family, or even any kids at all, as the kids will probably leave when they grow up and never give you a dime. In the Philippines: as soon as they start working, you have an income. If you have a lot of kids, then you stand a reasonable chance of one or two of them being successful enough to raise your living standard. Or, even if you have 12 offspring who work in low-wage jobs, at least that is better than only having 2 in low wage jobs. Richer folks would have fewer children, and invest more in each individual child's future.