cyberdad wrote:
Brictoria wrote:
Sadly, it seems, anything favourable to the Catholic church needs to be ignored\hidden by a certain sub-set of people, as it goes against the preferred narative regarding the church and clergy.
The "preferred" narrative regarding the church and clergy isn't exactly all that far from the truth.
So, you're saying that > 50% of the clergy were engaged in the activity behind the narative (less, making it a minority, and it is therefore far from the truth...And I would estimate it is likely less than 5% - still too many, but not as pervasive as you are trying to make it sound).
cyberdad wrote:
[My own experience spending 12 yrs as an Anglican in a private catholic school was tantamount to being constantly reminded by staff and students that I was the only non-Catholic allowed to enter their sacremented ground.
However, mainstream catholic schools might be more socially inclusive of non-catholics.
Having attended a Catholic secondary school myself, there was no different treatment of non-Catholics to that which Catholics recieved, either from staff, or from fellow students...But then again, my parents didn't have the money to send me (or my siblings) to one of the "private catholic schools" (as you call them), as we weren't "upper class", so I can't speak for what the "elites" experienced and will have to take your word for what it was like there. That said, I do wonder why your parents continued sending you to a catholic school if it was as bad as you claim here...Was it by any chance a boarding school?