cyberdad wrote:
The shopkeepers were naturally protecting their investments.
The photo you enthusiastically presented back here was taken before the election
So, to clarify, which of these was the "true" statement:
cyberdad wrote:
"I did say MAGAs kill people not property"
OR
cyberdad wrote:
"This was reported yesterday on the news in NY - shop fronts ready for the MAGA stampede "
Given the later was related to protecting property (not lives) from "MAGAs"?
If the former is true, then the latter must have been a lie given the indication property was being protected from "MAGAs" contradicts the assertion MAGAs were a risk to life and not property
Similarly, were the latter true, then the former was a lie for similar reasons.