13 Aug 2007, 1:45 pm
13 Aug 2007, 1:47 pm
13 Aug 2007, 1:48 pm
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I am going to wait for others to fight there corner first
Maybe this kinda thing is why you didn't get into Oxford...
There's no 'can't be bothered' about anything with you. You keep on replying. If you put half the effort you spend accusing me of attention seeking, into coming up with some decent points, maybe we'd be getting somewhere.
You've lost again and again since you joined WP.
I applied for maths dearie, so i dont think they would give a toss about my spag, let along on an internet forum. You didnt get into Oxford either, so dont try that one with me. As for responding to your posts, i was bored. Possibly drunk as well. If I posted any more good points you would just go on, "oh your bigoted", "thats sh**" and so on. When you open your mind a little I may come back and post something. Until then, enjoy your orgy.
im the one calling you a bigot
He probably loses track of who says what, given how many times he gets owned by different people.
13 Aug 2007, 1:53 pm
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
13 Aug 2007, 2:07 pm
Sopho wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Hadron wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Hadron wrote:
I am going to wait for others to fight there corner first
Maybe this kinda thing is why you didn't get into Oxford...
There's no 'can't be bothered' about anything with you. You keep on replying. If you put half the effort you spend accusing me of attention seeking, into coming up with some decent points, maybe we'd be getting somewhere.
You've lost again and again since you joined WP.
I applied for maths dearie, so i dont think they would give a toss about my spag, let along on an internet forum. You didnt get into Oxford either, so dont try that one with me. As for responding to your posts, i was bored. Possibly drunk as well. If I posted any more good points you would just go on, "oh your bigoted", "thats sh**" and so on. When you open your mind a little I may come back and post something. Until then, enjoy your orgy.
im the one calling you a bigot
He probably loses track of who says what, given how many times he gets owned by different people.
in combination with always having the same thing to say
as far as not getting into oxford.... that's really the only proof of quality of his grasp of math that we have
im a lil disinclined to believe he's good at applying it.... least in certain areas
im not strictly a math major... but my field does deal pretty heavily in population math
13 Aug 2007, 2:25 pm
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
13 Aug 2007, 2:33 pm
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Stop being so L I T E R A L. I'm using the common definition of bi, which is, if I'm not mistaken, prefering both genders simultaneously, nearly simultaneously, or fairly interchangably.
so hardwired... so sad...
I'd probably be bi if it was okay with my God.
You still can't even PARROT MY WORDS. What I said, twice because it wasn't understood the first time, was that INITIALLY it felt forced, but THEN, the door to *Pandora's box was opened, and I reveled in my sin, quite to the utmost. (*I'm referring to the Greek Pandora, not the WP member.)
My brain is a scary place -- you don't wanna go there. The brick wall you keep banging your head on is that you will insist on quantifying my qualitatives. When I'm the slightest bit qualitative in my thinking, you say I'm lying. Use a little imagination! If I add a little poetry to my phrasings, don't take it like a frickin' computer!
But seriously, we need to be related before you can trash me this much.
Sedaka wrote:
and if you really were even bi.... then that blatant loophole would have jumped out at you a bazillion yrs ago as a possible response to me thrashing your "comparison"....
so hardwired... so sad...
Sedaka wrote:
which you're not even doing now.... cause you're not even bi.....
I'd probably be bi if it was okay with my God.
Sedaka wrote:
i have contemplated F***ing women... that doesn't make me either of the two either
and i doubt someone even Bi would describe their attraction to the same sex as being "forced"... especially compared to their "lifelong" attraction to women
and i doubt someone even Bi would describe their attraction to the same sex as being "forced"... especially compared to their "lifelong" attraction to women
You still can't even PARROT MY WORDS. What I said, twice because it wasn't understood the first time, was that INITIALLY it felt forced, but THEN, the door to *Pandora's box was opened, and I reveled in my sin, quite to the utmost. (*I'm referring to the Greek Pandora, not the WP member.)
Sedaka wrote:
you just keep getting more and more tangled in your own web
My brain is a scary place -- you don't wanna go there. The brick wall you keep banging your head on is that you will insist on quantifying my qualitatives. When I'm the slightest bit qualitative in my thinking, you say I'm lying. Use a little imagination! If I add a little poetry to my phrasings, don't take it like a frickin' computer!
But seriously, we need to be related before you can trash me this much.
1) if you want me to stop being literal... you're gonna have to keep straight definitions... you change them all the time
So do you.
Sedaka wrote:
3) be whatever you wanna be
I am.
I can't sustain attraction for guys. I can't STOP thinking about girls.Sedaka wrote:
4) know you're full of BS about the whole forced thing cause it took you pages upon pages of dodging the anwer to come up with that lame excuse
I think it just took you pages to finally get it.
Sedaka wrote:
6) we are related.... we had that monkey-like ancestor way back when.
Well, Adam DID walk around outside naked all the time...
Last edited by Ragtime on 13 Aug 2007, 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
13 Aug 2007, 2:34 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
Then you weren't gay to begin with, if you always had heterosexual attraction. So you have no idea what it's like to be gay.
13 Aug 2007, 2:35 pm
Ragtime wrote:
The fact that Adam walked around naked outside doesn't make him a monkey.
Just an exhibitionist.
13 Aug 2007, 2:49 pm
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
Then you weren't gay to begin with, if you always had heterosexual attraction. So you have no idea what it's like to be gay.
I used the correct definition: the Bible's. There is no gay vs. bi there.
13 Aug 2007, 2:52 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
Then you weren't gay to begin with, if you always had heterosexual attraction. So you have no idea what it's like to be gay.
I used the correct definition: the Bible's. There is no gay vs. bi there.
The Bible's definition isn't the correct definition. Try a dictionary for once.
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
13 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Stop being so L I T E R A L. I'm using the common definition of bi, which is, if I'm not mistaken, prefering both genders simultaneously, nearly simultaneously, or fairly interchangably.
so hardwired... so sad...
I'd probably be bi if it was okay with my God.
You still can't even PARROT MY WORDS. What I said, twice because it wasn't understood the first time, was that INITIALLY it felt forced, but THEN, the door to *Pandora's box was opened, and I reveled in my sin, quite to the utmost. (*I'm referring to the Greek Pandora, not the WP member.)
My brain is a scary place -- you don't wanna go there. The brick wall you keep banging your head on is that you will insist on quantifying my qualitatives. When I'm the slightest bit qualitative in my thinking, you say I'm lying. Use a little imagination! If I add a little poetry to my phrasings, don't take it like a frickin' computer!
But seriously, we need to be related before you can trash me this much.
Sedaka wrote:
and if you really were even bi.... then that blatant loophole would have jumped out at you a bazillion yrs ago as a possible response to me thrashing your "comparison"....
so hardwired... so sad...
Sedaka wrote:
which you're not even doing now.... cause you're not even bi.....
I'd probably be bi if it was okay with my God.
Sedaka wrote:
i have contemplated F***ing women... that doesn't make me either of the two either
and i doubt someone even Bi would describe their attraction to the same sex as being "forced"... especially compared to their "lifelong" attraction to women
and i doubt someone even Bi would describe their attraction to the same sex as being "forced"... especially compared to their "lifelong" attraction to women
You still can't even PARROT MY WORDS. What I said, twice because it wasn't understood the first time, was that INITIALLY it felt forced, but THEN, the door to *Pandora's box was opened, and I reveled in my sin, quite to the utmost. (*I'm referring to the Greek Pandora, not the WP member.)
Sedaka wrote:
you just keep getting more and more tangled in your own web
My brain is a scary place -- you don't wanna go there. The brick wall you keep banging your head on is that you will insist on quantifying my qualitatives. When I'm the slightest bit qualitative in my thinking, you say I'm lying. Use a little imagination! If I add a little poetry to my phrasings, don't take it like a frickin' computer!
But seriously, we need to be related before you can trash me this much.
1) if you want me to stop being literal... you're gonna have to keep straight definitions... you change them all the time
So do you.
Sedaka wrote:
3) be whatever you wanna be
I am.
I can't sustain attraction for guys. I can't STOP thinking about girls.Sedaka wrote:
4) know you're full of BS about the whole forced thing cause it took you pages upon pages of dodging the anwer to come up with that lame excuse
I think it just took you pages to finally get it.
Sedaka wrote:
6) we are related.... we had that monkey-like ancestor way back when.
Well, Adam DID walk around outside naked all the time...
1) you are the one who keeps changing their def. of gay/bi/straight to whatever suites your argument. i have never believed for a sec that your homo. experiments were real nor have i waffled on what constitutes as gay/bi nor my belief that both are AOK
3) im so tired of you saying you're straight bi straight bi........ duh you're straight.. it's sad you describe yourself as straight yet claim bi-ness to try and defeat the other side in some situations... cause if you cannot sustain your homo. attractions, you have no right to even claim you have any idea about the issue at hand... and you sound completely ret*d saying you're "prolly bi" ... plz refer to #1
4) no i think you're just stupid and in denial.... you're so easy to read... i even see you incorporating (big) words that i use in your subsequent posts...
6) what's that mean? he was so frustrated that rather than be gay he turned to beastiality?
Last edited by Sedaka on 13 Aug 2007, 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
13 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sopho wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
Then you weren't gay to begin with, if you always had heterosexual attraction. So you have no idea what it's like to be gay.
I used the correct definition: the Bible's. There is no gay vs. bi there.
The Bible's definition isn't the correct definition. Try a dictionary for once.
Modern dictionary definitions change the nature of the universe for you, not for me.
13 Aug 2007, 2:57 pm
Sedaka
Veteran
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Age: 43
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,597
Location: In the recesses of my mind
13 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Ragtime wrote:
Sedaka wrote:
Ragtime wrote:
As for the homo thought experiments, they never nulified my hetero cravings.
my how you change your tune so quickly
amazing.... really... it is
And yet I never contradicted the bolded comment.
you said that quote WAY after we burried your first attempt at selling your homo experiments...
and you're taking it out of context
yay short term memory ftw!
13 Aug 2007, 3:02 pm
