Page 10 of 32 [ 508 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 32  Next


Do you believe in a God or follow any sort of religion?
yes (I'm aspie/autie) 41%  41%  [ 127 ]
no (I'm aspie/autie) 55%  55%  [ 170 ]
yes (I'm NT) 3%  3%  [ 8 ]
no (I'm NT) 2%  2%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 310

skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

28 Aug 2008, 3:43 pm

slowmutant wrote:
These other guys are so negative. :roll:



i'd say more contrarian than negative.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

28 Aug 2008, 3:46 pm

skafather84 wrote:
slowmutant wrote:
These other guys are so negative. :roll:



i'd say more contrarian than negative.


Exactly.



z0rp
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 747
Location: New York, USA

28 Aug 2008, 4:22 pm

greenblue wrote:
alba wrote:
z0rp wrote:
alba wrote:
Zorp, I tried calling myself a pantheist for awhile but it didn't work. I didn't have the same take on it that other pantheists have. I ought to give it another shot. Can't remember now why I didn't resonate with them.

Well taking from wikipedia the definition of pantheism is:
Quote:
Pantheism (Greek: πάν ( 'pan' ) = all and θεός ( 'theos' ) = God, it literally means "God is All" and "All is God".) is the view that everything is of an all-encompassing immanent abstract God; or that the Universe, or nature, and God are equivalent.

Which is why I assumed you were a pantheist, you were saying you believe that God is the universe, or it's all God, or there is no God to believe in, just the universe which are all extremely pantheistic traits.



Yes. I don't think I would be offended to be called a pantheist but it depends on if there is some hidden agenda.

When I said I was a pantheist in the Yahoo religion chatrooms I didn't like the insulting responses I got so I stopped using that term to describe my spiritual path. My particular brand of pantheism seems only affiliated with advaita vedanta as opposed to wicca or paganism.

Insulting by whom? Do they make the direct connection to paganism?
I have had considered pantheism, when questioning about god and religion, but aimed to naturalistic pantheism, Nature=God, rather than the other types of pantheism, mostly a philosophical approach rather than a religious with spiritual/paranormal view.

Well the reason I'm not a pantheist is because it's a waste of thought. Pantheism is saying God is everything, or God is the universe, that's basically just saying God as a synonym to Universe or all. The advantage you could argue with pantheism is that you can tell people you believe in God though that's hardly an advantage in my opinion, and you don't actually believe in the God most people would think, though you don't have to tell them that. In general I don't believe God should be used as a synonym to the universe therefore I'm not a pantheist, I'm purely an Atheist. That's the way I see it.



iamnotaparakeet
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2007
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 25,091
Location: 0.5 Galactic radius

28 Aug 2008, 5:29 pm

skafather84 wrote:
Hillsong_Rocks wrote:
while you where still a sinner he sent his son 2 die on a cross



i doubt sand is THAT old.


Biblically, the atonement, though performed on Passover around 27 AD,
is timeless and for all who would accept Him.



skafather84
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2006
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,848
Location: New Orleans, LA

28 Aug 2008, 5:44 pm

iamnotaparakeet wrote:
skafather84 wrote:
Hillsong_Rocks wrote:
while you where still a sinner he sent his son 2 die on a cross



i doubt sand is THAT old.


Biblically, the atonement, though performed on Passover around 27 AD,
is timeless and for all who would accept Him.



"while you were still a sinner"


the right way would have been to say that even though he was not yet a sinner. i was making a joke at the expense of words. i'm quite familiar with christian mythology.


_________________
Wherever they burn books they will also, in the end, burn human beings. ~Heinrich Heine, Almansor, 1823

?I wouldn't recommend sex, drugs or insanity for everyone, but they've always worked for me.? - Hunter S. Thompson


alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

28 Aug 2008, 5:58 pm

My usual reply to the - do you believe in god question - is to say I'm an atheist. My god can't be measured by western standards. But rather than just negating the western concept of god, I've found resonance with the eastern version. For me it's very positive and uplifting, not simply a negation of western deity.

People might not recognize it, but I have faith and it's solid. When I feel weak and insecure I lean into it. It's an eastern thing. I can't understand the personal creator god thing so I don't even try. My belief is that you can't point to anything and say it isn't god. Linear thinking is necessary in daily life but I'm more comfortable without it. So my spiritual beliefs resonate with no beginning and no end.

I would say there are times when I'm able to get beyond my thoughts and feelings. What propells me into that type of consciousness could be anything. It's not something I can do on demand but I want to be heading in that direction. What the easterners call spiritual enlightenment is what I'm talking about.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

28 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm

Greenblue, could you elaborate?



slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

28 Aug 2008, 6:15 pm

attn alba

Would you have us believe that you are, in fact, an enlightened buddha? Such beings are cosmicaly rare. It's nothing against you, nothing personal, but I very much doubt that you are a living buddha.

I was a Buddhist for a while before I came back to the church, you see.



alba
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 756

29 Aug 2008, 10:34 am

slowmutant wrote:
attn alba

Would you have us believe that you are, in fact, an enlightened buddha? Such beings are cosmicaly rare. It's nothing against you, nothing personal, but I very much doubt that you are a living buddha.

I was a Buddhist for a while before I came back to the church, you see.





haha. I regard Buddha as an exemplary being and enlightened master and hope nothing I said implied I view myself in the same way.



Transcention
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

29 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm

I actually write religion.

I learned early in my study of religion something that I find terribly amusing. I can't take credit for it as I read it somewhere in my own personal research. It's quite possible I worked out this truth long before I read that other people think the way I do it's impossible to tell after 20 years of meditation and research. That's the most mysterious of points at which my own free will breaks down and I become what the Universe, Existence, God, has made of me. You know, free will, determinism and stuff. Is the Universe, Existence what I make of it, or is the Universe, Existence what it makes of me. 8) I can't tell the difference.

I'v always been agnostic, I have in fact studied the history of agnosticism, the term agnosticism was actually coined, or at the very least explored by a little known, if still slightly, famous academic called Thomas.H.Huxley. He was the grandfather or great grandfather of Aldous Huxley.

The basic premise of agnosticism is very simple.

It is just as incorrect to beleive one knows what the power that governs Existence is, as much as it is incorrect to believe that there is no power that governs Existence.

It is just as stupid to actually believe in God as it is stupid to believe that no God exists.

The Universe acts like a vast firewall if I may use that analogy. Human beings can gain no actual information about whether God exists, or does not exist.

I write religion, I have heard no voices.

I do not know the future.

I do not know what governs Existence, or if anything governs it at all.

I do not know what happens to the personality of a person when they die.

And I am quite proud of the fact that I write religion and that I am bound by the same laws of science that all human beings are bound by.

My entire family is quite bent intellectually, my grandfather, cousin and Uncle are all athiest, they are both scientists and accountants respectively.

I'm the black, or blue, sheep of the family. If you'll pardon my rather esoteric pun. I'v kinda transcended my blue period. I think I'v gone into my azure period at this point. Or maybe my green period, or f*****g rainbow coloured period. At this point in time I am what I say I am, I say what it is I say I do and I, Just, Am.

However, if one is truely objective about the subject about whether God exists, or doesn't exist then the current absolute truth in relation to human Existence, is that one can gain no information, of any kind, about either premise. The true position one must take if one wishes to be enlightened is agnosticism.

The only correct intellectual stance one can take as to whether God exists or does not exist, is that one can gain no information about either premise.

I'v given humanity permission to say "I don't know what the truth is, in relation to what governs the Universe, or, if anything governs it at all".

I guess one could set up a control experiment where one takes a thousand or so people and learns to stop their Life processes, just long enough, that they can be resucitated and then interview them about their experience. However, I'm not sure one would receive any definitive data from such a drastic experiment.

Transcention Universia.

AKA - SaToriBluE

Further essential reading on my own personal theories that relate to the nature of Existence - http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt74903.html



Last edited by Transcention on 29 Aug 2008, 7:49 pm, edited 18 times in total.

slowmutant
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Feb 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,430
Location: Ontario, Canada

29 Aug 2008, 5:49 pm

Quote:
I actually write religion


Explain.

You've got the cleanest, leanest definition of agnosticism I've seen so far. Or does that belong to Huxley?

But what if seeking to know God does not involve the scientific method? With religious faith you are neither right nor wrong in the eyes of science. You are not on the radar-screen of science if you approach God through faith instead of knowledge.



Transcention
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

29 Aug 2008, 5:56 pm

In direct answer to your second question, at some point, human beings may actually find someway, through science or otherwise that proves definitively all kinds of things about how Existence is governed. But that day isn't today. One has to work with the point in spacetime that human beings are currently at, and work our way up. You don't have to have the answer to what governs Existence, maybe it's just part of the journey of Life. It if takes a million, or a billion years to work out what governs Existence, seriously, what's the rush? Take your time humanity, enjoy the journey. Try and survive, that's priority number one, and then see how far that journey takes you. Humanity isn't going to work out anything at all, if it's extinct. Humanity has to stop lying to itself and leading itself onto the path of self deception and needs to start accepting the limits of the point of spacetime it exists in. If I were to tell you some grandiose story, that I had some kind of religious revelation that explained everything about what governs Existence, would that in anyway improve your Life, or improve humanities chance to survive in the Universe? No if I lied to you, then I would be doing the exact opposite, I would be accelerating humanity towards, potentially, extinction, or worse.

Think about it, I write religion. You can't get more religious than that. One cannot have a more definitive religious experience than having one's entire being, being completely subservient to the process of writing religion. I've pulled up a chair dozons of times, asked God, or one of it's subordinates to appear and give me at least the most vague explanation of what Existence is all about. Guess what? The chair stayed empty. One cannot get more faithful or religious than me. My whole being is completely devoted to writing religion to the very extent of my human ability and I have had no direct contact with any supremely, alien, divine, or technological force that governs Existence. Your not allowed to have that information, man. Humanity, just doesn't have the clearence to access that information, trust me. :twisted:

I have an inate gift in that I write religion. There is no rational explanation for it. I write religion no different to a plumber fixes toilets, or a psychiatrist antagonises their poor patients.

I'm also very non-neurotypical from the very extent of the neurodiversity of the world I live in and I am very Ill. My mind is sharp as it can be, but my brain and body is locked into some kind of state of neurological/cognitive anomoly that would in some forums be celebrated and make me insanely rich, instead, I am here giving you some of the most incalcuably valuable information for free. Life only know why it gifted me the way it did and made me as agonizingly ill as I am.

My whole being is completely sequestered for the task, it's all I have ever thought about. All I have done for as long as I can remember is calculate the current state human beings find themselves at, at this particular point in spacetime and I calculate the dimensions of a religion that is relevent to the times in which I live.

I am not a prophet, messiah, buddah or any such notion.

My name is Michael Williamson, my alias is Transcention Unversia, I just thought that was dignified and catchy, the name of my religion is Universalism, and I am human. Techniqually, there is a Christian sect that labels themselves Universalist, but f**k em, the name is way to cool for them to use. I'm commandeering it in the name of sanity. Through my authority, as something no one has ever seen before. Screw them they can't have it.

I am a human being and I write religion. I am bound by the same laws of science and nature that all human beings are bound by. I am imperfect. My writing is imperfect, even if I am a perfectionist by nature.

Religion to me is merely a conceptual framework that groups of people can use to relate to each other better and have a reason to hang out with each other. I can elaborate but I am on a simplicity trip right now.

I'v always been naturally agnostic. I simply looked at Existence and decided that I can access no information about what governs Existence, or for that matter if anything at all governs Existence. And I have thought LONG AND HARD, about it.

One often finds that one is not alone is how one understands Existence. One often finds that people have come before them that have seen Existence the way they themselves see it. I discovered the concept of Agnosticism through my study and research and followed the concept back to it's source. It's fascinating to research Thomas.H.Huxley. He's a little known academic who basically coined one of the most significant concepts in the human language. He was also good friends with Charles Darwin for the record. His importance to human history is as important as the work Newton and Einstein did, to me personally.

But I'v always been naturally agnostic, it is the only objective, intellectual position one can make in relation to whether God exists, or doesn't exist.

It's okay to say "I Don't Know". One doesn't need to have the answers to the more profound questions that human beings can ask about Existence.''

It's okay to write religion that says. Human beings don't know if God exists or does not exist. In fact it's preferable if the writer of a religion actually has any code of conduct they hold themselves to or has a high level of standards that they hold themselves to.

I write religion that is relevent to people who think the way I do.

I find a lot of people tend to become aethiest because they are so disgusted by the current state of human religion that they simple retreat to a position where they don't actually have to do anything about the poor state of human religion as it stands.

Religion is however the author with their own free will decides to write it. Well it's a bit more complicated than that now isn't it?

What I can tell you is that it is just as stupid to not believe in God as it is to believe in God. Both positions are equally unconstructive.



Last edited by Transcention on 29 Aug 2008, 7:38 pm, edited 15 times in total.

Transcention
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

29 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm

Techniqually, though for the record, Agnosicism, as a concept, and as one of the true keys to enlightenment, belongs to all human beings who wish to reach what tiny fraction of a degree of enlightenement that human beings are capable of attaining. Agnosticism is the truth no one in a sense owns it. It's like one of the beacons in Existence that is just there to guide those that truely wish to be enlightened, that one sees if one is intellectually agile enough.

Feel free to prove me wrong but it's impossible to argue against the absolute truth in relation to the current point in spacetime that human beings find themselves at.

The truth is that one can gain no information about whether God (sic) exists, or does not exist.

Of course the very concept of God takes some elaboration in relation to the probabilities of what it might actually be, but probabilities do not equal the reality of what might or might now govern Existence.

I know the true nature of God as it relates to human beings.

The true nature of God is that we, as human beings, know absolutely nothing about it.

It's a bit of a trick question. But hey what can I say. I'm not here to tell you that I know what is impossible to know.



claire-333
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,658

29 Aug 2008, 7:43 pm

Welcome and Greetings, Transcention. Thank you for your posts.



prometheuspann
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Age: 53
Gender: Male
Posts: 320

29 Aug 2008, 7:56 pm

http://mytalktoday.com/solutions/viewto ... =47&t=1052

Quote:
Quote:
When people say they believe in God..

What does “believing in God” actually mean?


Obviously it means different things to different people.
I don't believe in somebody elses god and, i don't expect them to believe in mine.
The difference between my god and most is that my god is demonstrably experiencible
by anybody willing to do the work and their god is merely a political hack cross between y'shua
and dionYSIUS.



Quote:
"God" is a cultural and paradigmal convention which means the given end goal or highest single entity on a pyramidal or hierarchal order scheme. God is just a symbol. Reified. What exists is all
that is+ and its quantum information, and your brodmann brain areas and senses which are subliminal until you achieve a waking theta condition.



Quote:
--------
/An Atheist/ there is no such thing. There are several different phenomenon which we collectively call atheist. Some of those phenomenon beleive some things and some of them
are wise enough to have zero belief at all. The ones who actually leave the paradigm don't argue
against the darkness; they light their own candle.




Quote:

I'm caught in the middle. To me there is no argument.
I can integrate all of science and logic and all of religion. Not just christianity; and not excluding it either. And for each of these paradigms I can see good things and bad things, trash, and gems.

I would collect the pearls. The swine of their own paradigms trample them under.

To the atheists; i can say honestly; I am one of you. I refuse to believe in anything.
Only direct experience which can reproduced has value. All else is potentially illusion.
And so then i would challenge them to obtain a waking theta state; so we can get back to
the adult level of talking about what really exists rather than pitting our projections into battle with somebody elses paradigm hang ups.

to the Christians; I can honestly say, I know the bible and christianity and I walk with christ
and God in a deep and personal way. I have studied the bible intimately, and scoured it for the gems that it has to offer, and i have done esoteric research to put esoteric contexts back into
the mix and work with my understanding to surpass all mistranslations and entropy. I am a fan and student of the talmud, the torah, the tanakh, the mishna, and the qaballah. I know my christianity. I know the essenes and the gnostics and i know christian world history.

do they?

I can talk to god. And yet their god does not exist. My god does exist but its a god i must provide caveats for. My god is no more omnipotent than I am. In fact, my god has no will and no mind. It has no consciousness of me at all until i reach into it and touch it. It can't see me any better than i can see an atom. It doesn't care whether or not i exist and it mostly is asleep and assumes i don't.
My god is so vast and impersonal because it is what is out there; the infinite pool of quantum information and my ability to interact with it because i'm the observer making those observations.

My god is orders of magnitude larger than they have imagined; and my god can be described via formal math and peered at via atomic physics and the implicate orders of the universe.

And i can enter into a waking theta condition, step into the merkabah bubble, inflate the adam kadmon body, travel up the tree, and step into the presence of and thus awaken my god;
and via that connection and because of me; i empower god to even know earth as a tiny little ball of dust even exists.
My god is not omnipotent, but bound by and as by being the actual laws of physics; the scalar frcatal equation that binds the universe together and defines its forms and functions.

I have met and I have talked with that god. And it doesn't bother me in the slightest to admit that its probably all just a hallucination. Because the point of spirituality is to make the connection inward and overcome the shadow and the darkness within to do good in the world;
not find something outside of yourself to worship.

Before enlightenment; chop wood carry water. After enlightenment; chop wood carry water.


_________________
http://mytalktoday.com/solutions.invalid
My place PLEASE COME VISIT!!


Transcention
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 117

29 Aug 2008, 8:05 pm

I live in almost absolute seclusion, I humble myself before you.

My theories, philosophies and religion is yours to do with as you will.

No one I have met has given me any respect, nor, assistence, aside from my wife, in my most lonely of trade.

I should be teaching at University, people should be interested in what I give you, for free. Even if I am meaningless next to what I actually write.

I am alone in what I create. I am a pariah. I am a heretic.

I am an absolute heretic.

Your eyes, are almost the only eyes, ever to have seen what I write.

I like to remind people of my absolute humanity. I like people to know how agonising my cognitive anomaly is.

I sometimes wonder if Life made me so terribly imperfect, so that the writing I do, somehow has more meaning.

I have to leave these forums soon. I won't be able to come back for a long time. My mind is about to shut down again. There will be no more editing, there will be no more writing for a while. I need to shut down soon and go back to seclusion.

But I'v been glad to share what I know.

I'm torn between sharing what I know, so that one day I can make a living from the writing I do. I know for a fact my wife doesn't want me to tell you all what I know, because she sees a future in it's publishing that by sharing it I might destroy through plagurism.

I have dreams.

I want to build a worldwide religion based on my philosophies, so I can build temples, and the infrastructure that I need that can spread these ideas of mine across off all humanity.

I want to build schools, universities, and fund every type of scientific research that is possible.

I'm so ill, though. Can you imagine what would happen if I wasn't ill? It would be beautiful.

I am just as much a slave to my Aspergers as I am a slave to the philosophy that I write.

Until I die though, my work will never end. I can only hope that I succeed. The odds in my case are not high. I have no assistence. I have no one to talk to. People avoid me like I am cursed. The sanest man alive, may die without not a soul ever knowing what I know.

But where there is Life, there is hope.

When I do walk away from this forum, and soon I will walk away, and I will be all alone again aside from my wife, I know that no one will be there to assist me. And Life only knows I need all the help I can get.



Last edited by Transcention on 29 Aug 2008, 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.