Haliphron wrote:
So christianity is based on the suppositions that:God Exists,Satan Exists, & the existence of God is blatantly obvious as claimed by the bible and that these suppositions are true. DITTO for satanism, the difference between the two being that satanists embrace the law of sin and christians embrace the law of God. Atheism however, does NOT accept these suppositions are true.
Ok, and the atheist does not consider himself a satanist, does this mean that a Christian cannot consider the atheist a satanist? Not only that, but do the Christians accept that Satanism is necessarily the doctrine that follows the suppositions you put forward for Satanism? I mean, part of the issue will be different definitions on what a Satanist really is, as if one says "A satanist is a follower of satan, like a Christian is a follower of God" then atheists can very well be satanists.
Quote:
According to atheism, the supposition that there is only the low of god or the law of sin is FALSE. Yet satanism supposes it to be true! If you try to equate atheism and satanism than you get a CONTRADICTION: *there is only the law of god and the low of sin And there is neither*. That means that atheism and satanism are Not consistent, EVEN In the framework of the christian worldview!
Not necessarily, the issue is that you have defined satanism differently than your opponents would, who would take "satanism" to be a broader concept than you are supposing. This means it still can work. The issue is not forcing your suppositions upon how others are defining terms, but rather trying to understand clearly the opposition's framework and address it. When dealing with weird groups, you often have to try harder than you would traditionally as they will function with a more explicitly different framework.