30 Oct 2018, 10:57 am
AspE wrote:
Chummy wrote:
But SJW are prepared to use violence and break the law to enforce what they believe is "right". You won't force me to believe something that in your interpretation is right but I think is wrong - the state law is above all that and if the issue does not contradict it - we all have the freedom not to be enforced!. By the way, what we now agree upon as Ethics/law/moral code that is used by most western states is a long time process of development throughout human history: starting with the Hebrew bible at: "don't steal", "don't kill" and then more laws entered the consensus during the new testament, French/American revolution (Democracy, peoples' rule), American Civil War (no more slaves by law), Women's rights movements (Women can vote, be elected and have equal rights etc.)
Now you aren't just dehumanizing the left, you are calling them violent. Meanwhile, the right demands zero restrictions on gun ownership (the tools of violence) because they might need to overthrow some theoretical oppressive government (the law).
Wow, 80 IQ detected?
"I'm dehumanizing the left" AND calling them violent.? Let's find the word "left" and "all of them are violent" in my post. Please work on your reading comprehension. Otherwise stop wasting my valuable time
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,672
Location: Long Island, New York
06 Nov 2018, 3:22 pm
Quote:
After announcing that she has converted to Islam and changed her name to Shuhada Davitt, Sinead O’Connor took to Twitter to tell her followers that she never wants to spend time with white people ever again, upsetting her Muslim fans.
The 51-year-old star, who has a history of mental health issues and revealed she’s bipolar, took to Twitter on Tuesday to announce that she’s not interested in being around non-Muslim people ever again.
“I'm terribly sorry. What I'm about to say is something so racist I never thought my soul could ever feel it. But truly I never wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-muslims are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting,” she wrote.
The comment caused an immediate backlash amongst those that follow her new religion, who immediately took to the post’s comments in an attempt to set the star straight on her views.
“Dear Sister, whoever is ‘teaching’ you about Islam, seems to be trying to lead you astray. Islam has no racial boundaries and racism is an utterly abhorrent trait. The Prophet (pbuh) clearly stated no race is superior or inferior to any other. Please find correct guidance.” one user wrote.
O’Connor appeared to respond to the backlash in another tweet saying, “Forgive me. Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers
.”
She continued her tirade later into the day commenting on Catholicism, Donald Trump and a great many other topics on her Twitter.
The 51-year-old star, who has a history of mental health issues and revealed she’s bipolar, took to Twitter on Tuesday to announce that she’s not interested in being around non-Muslim people ever again.
“I'm terribly sorry. What I'm about to say is something so racist I never thought my soul could ever feel it. But truly I never wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-muslims are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting,” she wrote.
The comment caused an immediate backlash amongst those that follow her new religion, who immediately took to the post’s comments in an attempt to set the star straight on her views.
“Dear Sister, whoever is ‘teaching’ you about Islam, seems to be trying to lead you astray. Islam has no racial boundaries and racism is an utterly abhorrent trait. The Prophet (pbuh) clearly stated no race is superior or inferior to any other. Please find correct guidance.” one user wrote.
O’Connor appeared to respond to the backlash in another tweet saying, “Forgive me. Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers
.”She continued her tirade later into the day commenting on Catholicism, Donald Trump and a great many other topics on her Twitter.
Hey at least she admits people can be racist against white people so that may disqualify her as an SJW.
If the person who made who made Micheal Jackson “white” is still around maybe he or she can help her so looking in the mirror is not such a triggering event for her.
07 Nov 2018, 11:20 am
ASPartOfMe wrote:
Sinead O'Connor upsets Muslims by saying she won't associate with white people: 'They are disgusting'
Hey at least she admits people can be racist against white people so that may disqualify her as an SJW.
If the person who made who made Micheal Jackson “white” is still around maybe he or she can help her so looking in the mirror is not such a triggering event for her.
Quote:
After announcing that she has converted to Islam and changed her name to Shuhada Davitt, Sinead O’Connor took to Twitter to tell her followers that she never wants to spend time with white people ever again, upsetting her Muslim fans.
The 51-year-old star, who has a history of mental health issues and revealed she’s bipolar, took to Twitter on Tuesday to announce that she’s not interested in being around non-Muslim people ever again.
“I'm terribly sorry. What I'm about to say is something so racist I never thought my soul could ever feel it. But truly I never wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-muslims are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting,” she wrote.
The comment caused an immediate backlash amongst those that follow her new religion, who immediately took to the post’s comments in an attempt to set the star straight on her views.
“Dear Sister, whoever is ‘teaching’ you about Islam, seems to be trying to lead you astray. Islam has no racial boundaries and racism is an utterly abhorrent trait. The Prophet (pbuh) clearly stated no race is superior or inferior to any other. Please find correct guidance.” one user wrote.
O’Connor appeared to respond to the backlash in another tweet saying, “Forgive me. Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers.”
She continued her tirade later into the day commenting on Catholicism, Donald Trump and a great many other topics on her Twitter.
The 51-year-old star, who has a history of mental health issues and revealed she’s bipolar, took to Twitter on Tuesday to announce that she’s not interested in being around non-Muslim people ever again.
“I'm terribly sorry. What I'm about to say is something so racist I never thought my soul could ever feel it. But truly I never wanna spend time with white people again (if that's what non-muslims are called). Not for one moment, for any reason. They are disgusting,” she wrote.
The comment caused an immediate backlash amongst those that follow her new religion, who immediately took to the post’s comments in an attempt to set the star straight on her views.
“Dear Sister, whoever is ‘teaching’ you about Islam, seems to be trying to lead you astray. Islam has no racial boundaries and racism is an utterly abhorrent trait. The Prophet (pbuh) clearly stated no race is superior or inferior to any other. Please find correct guidance.” one user wrote.
O’Connor appeared to respond to the backlash in another tweet saying, “Forgive me. Sometimes the Lord needs dirty workers
.”She continued her tirade later into the day commenting on Catholicism, Donald Trump and a great many other topics on her Twitter.
Hey at least she admits people can be racist against white people so that may disqualify her as an SJW.
If the person who made who made Micheal Jackson “white” is still around maybe he or she can help her so looking in the mirror is not such a triggering event for her.
Isn't she white?
She is setting herself up for isolation since the majority are white lol. How is she going to function now since the majority are white? They will be at jobs, they will be her customers and so on. They will even be her boss. Unless she is so rich she doesn't need to work because her music still gives her enough income but that is the 1% of musicians and singers we see.
07 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
Chummy wrote:
AspE wrote:
Chummy wrote:
But SJW are prepared to use violence and break the law to enforce what they believe is "right". You won't force me to believe something that in your interpretation is right but I think is wrong - the state law is above all that and if the issue does not contradict it - we all have the freedom not to be enforced!. By the way, what we now agree upon as Ethics/law/moral code that is used by most western states is a long time process of development throughout human history: starting with the Hebrew bible at: "don't steal", "don't kill" and then more laws entered the consensus during the new testament, French/American revolution (Democracy, peoples' rule), American Civil War (no more slaves by law), Women's rights movements (Women can vote, be elected and have equal rights etc.)
Now you aren't just dehumanizing the left, you are calling them violent. Meanwhile, the right demands zero restrictions on gun ownership (the tools of violence) because they might need to overthrow some theoretical oppressive government (the law).
Wow, 80 IQ detected?
"I'm dehumanizing the left" AND calling them violent.? Let's find the word "left" and "all of them are violent" in my post. Please work on your reading comprehension. Otherwise stop wasting my valuable time
That doesn't mean you didn't mean it. I can read between the lines.
07 Nov 2018, 12:51 pm
07 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
AspE wrote:
Chummy wrote:
AspE wrote:
Chummy wrote:
But SJW are prepared to use violence and break the law to enforce what they believe is "right". You won't force me to believe something that in your interpretation is right but I think is wrong - the state law is above all that and if the issue does not contradict it - we all have the freedom not to be enforced!. By the way, what we now agree upon as Ethics/law/moral code that is used by most western states is a long time process of development throughout human history: starting with the Hebrew bible at: "don't steal", "don't kill" and then more laws entered the consensus during the new testament, French/American revolution (Democracy, peoples' rule), American Civil War (no more slaves by law), Women's rights movements (Women can vote, be elected and have equal rights etc.)
Now you aren't just dehumanizing the left, you are calling them violent. Meanwhile, the right demands zero restrictions on gun ownership (the tools of violence) because they might need to overthrow some theoretical oppressive government (the law).
Wow, 80 IQ detected?
"I'm dehumanizing the left" AND calling them violent.? Let's find the word "left" and "all of them are violent" in my post. Please work on your reading comprehension. Otherwise stop wasting my valuable time
That doesn't mean you didn't mean it. I can read between the lines.
That doesn't mean I MEANT it either. ROFLMFAO! clearly you failed to "read between the lines" because you made up lines that weren't there (BURNNNNED) and decided to act like an jerk instead. Twisting one's words into claiming he said/did something he didn't do is a personal attack/defamation per se, and I simply replied in the SAME mannerism.
Let every member here with more than 2 brain cells read my post and he will understand my message outright. I'll wager you whatever you want.
07 Nov 2018, 5:24 pm
Chummy wrote:
AspE wrote:
Chummy wrote:
But SJW are prepared to use violence and break the law to enforce what they believe is "right". You won't force me to believe something that in your interpretation is right but I think is wrong - the state law is above all that and if the issue does not contradict it - we all have the freedom not to be enforced!. By the way, what we now agree upon as Ethics/law/moral code that is used by most western states is a long time process of development throughout human history: starting with the Hebrew bible at: "don't steal", "don't kill" and then more laws entered the consensus during the new testament, French/American revolution (Democracy, peoples' rule), American Civil War (no more slaves by law), Women's rights movements (Women can vote, be elected and have equal rights etc.)
Now you aren't just dehumanizing the left, you are calling them violent. Meanwhile, the right demands zero restrictions on gun ownership (the tools of violence) because they might need to overthrow some theoretical oppressive government (the law).
Wow, 80 IQ detected?
"I'm dehumanizing the left" AND calling them violent.? Let's find the word "left" and "all of them are violent" in my post. Please work on your reading comprehension. Otherwise stop wasting my valuable time
The two of you are having a misunderstanding based on the ambiguous term "SJW," which some people use as a slur against the left in general, while others use it to mean something much more specific. You did say, "But SJW are prepared to use violence ...."
Your misunderstanding above is a good example of why I think we should ditch the term "SJW" in favor of something more literal and less ambiguous, such as perhaps "Social Justice Fanatic" -- especially on a message board for autistic people, some of whom have trouble with metaphorical language.
07 Nov 2018, 5:51 pm
07 Nov 2018, 6:20 pm
07 Nov 2018, 6:27 pm
07 Nov 2018, 7:03 pm
The channel looks to be on its way to recovery. I tried 5 videos and 3 worked, and he's even uploaded a new video to the channel.
07 Nov 2018, 9:15 pm
08 Nov 2018, 7:03 am
Ha. Shirrako has added thousands of new subscribers since his resurrection. He'll very soon pass the 500,000 mark at this rate.
10 Nov 2018, 10:51 am
Shirrako is up about 60K subs since he got unbanned. 
RetroGamer87
Veteran
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,105
Location: Adelaide, Australia
11 Nov 2018, 7:09 am
At last we come to the final stage of puritanism.
11 Nov 2018, 11:33 am
