If a girl is raped and pregnant, should she keep the baby?
You mean like sex ed, required for most high school students?
Well, the police do get involved when someone ha sex too far under the influence, that being considedered 'rape' because the inebriated person is incapable of consent under the law. The cops don't do checks, but all metaphors break down at some point.
Like registered sex offenders?
That is a major aspect of hospital births, and one of the things that a lot of home-birth advocates really hate on: we try to plan for the worst non-zebra event that can happen.
Exactly.
Most HCPs are that type as well. Blood and guts are fine, a long ad they're under control.
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Most HCPs are that type as well. Blood and guts are fine, a long ad they're under control.
Maybe I'm in the wrong profession then.
Two things helped:
1. Surgeons make it look so easy. This guy repaired intestinal scar tissue from the previous surgery in addition to stitching up all the girl parts as quickly and dexterously as I would a Mozart keyboard sonata when I've really been practicing, or like I'd have played one of the Weber clarinet concerti back my college days.
2. The way a surgical environment is set up, it's difficult to connect all the "stuff" with the person the "stuff" belongs to. I suppose it might be different if you witnessed someone being brutally attacked or, say, a fellow soldier get blown to bits in the battlefield.
And it could be I've just been desensitized by gory horror films and video games like Gears of War. Whatever the reason, it was an awesome thing to participate in, the birth of my littlest boy notwithstanding. What really gets me, though, is seeing someone's insides and coming face to face with just how delicate we really are.
AngelRho
Veteran

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
Criminals often do have more power over people's lives and property than the people themselves, though. A criminal's actions place him "above the law" so to speak, and he is asserting power that isn't rightfully his. Penalties, enslavement, incarceration, and death are attempts to put the powers wrongfully asserted by the criminal back into balance with society.
The power a criminal has over a rape victim extends to forcing a choice a woman shouldn't have to make because, one way or another, the baby is coming out and the rape victim can't change that, whether abortion or at-term childbirth (or anywhere in-between, of course). Blaming the VICTIM for the death of an aborted baby is unjust. But when a person is destroyed, someone or something must account for that death, be it "Nature," "acts of God," another person, or the dead person himself. Blaming the woman for killing a child conceived out of rape is wrong. You can't blame the baby because it isn't the baby's fault it was conceived. All you have left is to blame the rapist. And if he causes death, the state should require his life also.
Oodain
Veteran

Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,022
Location: in my own little tamarillo jungle,
Criminals often do have more power over people's lives and property than the people themselves, though. A criminal's actions place him "above the law" so to speak, and he is asserting power that isn't rightfully his. Penalties, enslavement, incarceration, and death are attempts to put the powers wrongfully asserted by the criminal back into balance with society.
The power a criminal has over a rape victim extends to forcing a choice a woman shouldn't have to make because, one way or another, the baby is coming out and the rape victim can't change that, whether abortion or at-term childbirth (or anywhere in-between, of course). Blaming the VICTIM for the death of an aborted baby is unjust. But when a person is destroyed, someone or something must account for that death, be it "Nature," "acts of God," another person, or the dead person himself. Blaming the woman for killing a child conceived out of rape is wrong. You can't blame the baby because it isn't the baby's fault it was conceived. All you have left is to blame the rapist. And if he causes death, the state should require his life also.
what a blinding pro life stance you have there,
disregarding everything but your own twisted sense of logic and justice.
_________________
//through chaos comes complexity//
the scent of the tamarillo is pungent and powerfull,
woe be to the nose who nears it.
Condoms have a 3% failure rate. This means that for each 33 women that have sex today using condoms, the expected number of cases in which the condom fails is 1.
Actually that would be ducking responsibility, the woman chose to have sex, both the man and the woman in that situation should have to deal with the consequences.
What you are essentially saying is it is okay to commit infanticide if the child is "incovenient," and this is why the overwhelming majorities of abortions take place...
Abortion is essentially legalized infanticide.
No. It's self defense. It's no more murder than shooting a would-be rapist is.
Depends on whether there is a genuine threat. Someone who understands the risks of having sex makes the choice to accept those consequences should they become a reality. Essentially, if you choose to have sex, you choose to roll the dice on getting pregnant. You HAVE a choice in terms of whether you get pregnant or not, so it isn't a good self-defense argument if no one is being threatened or ever under attack.
I don't LIKE that rape would make it a valid self-defense argument, but it is what it is and as a man it would be unjust for me to tell a woman she doesn't have freedom to do what she pleases when she never had a choice in getting pregnant in the first place.
Now, if becoming pregnant was not rape and thus a choice, I know for certain that things do happen in a pregnancy that really can be threatening to a mother's life. If you don't KNOW, then no one can rightly blame you because it is self-defense. But I do question whether the risk really is as severe as the pro-infanticide activists would have us believe. My wife experienced placenta previa in her second pregnancy, and there is no way to have a normal delivery when that happens. Survival of the infant and the mother is going to depend on how soon you can get to the hospital and just how close you can carry the pregnancy to term. In our case, we were able to get to the hospital in under an hour, the baby was delivered quickly, and she was over 4 pounds. There were a few problems like you'd expect with a 7 month premie, but a few weeks later she was strong, healthy, and you'd never have known things got so screwed up with the pregnancy. Now she's happy, she's learning to play piano, and she'll turn 4 in January. If my wife had elected to have an abortion, it would have deeply upset me, and I certainly wouldn't be enjoying a life enriched as it is by my daughter. But I value my wife's life above all other concerns. I would have learned to deal with it and somehow let it go. I feel blessed that I didn't have to.
Self defense is not about prior choice. If I annoy someone they still have no right to punch me in the face; likewise if a woman chooses to have sex this does not justify forcing her to remain pregnant.
_________________
'You're so cold, but you feel alive
Lay your hands on me, one last time' (Breaking Benjamin)
Since starting to work in a hospital, I have grown incapable of watching gratuitous violence and gore on films and in tv. Now that I know exactly what fine structures are being destroyed, and the amount of reconstruction, months or years of recovery, and the incomprehensible pain that will be required (not to mention the money involved!), it seems as childish as a four-year-old destroying a fine renaissance painting just to hear the canvas rip.
Yes; thankfully, we have laws, police, courts, and modern medicine to mitigate the destruction that criminals cause.
Here's where our disagreement on whether or not the zef is a 'baby' begins to matter, perhaps; getting that little bit of proto-person out, before it actually becomes a person, significantly reduces the damage imnsho: not just because the physical damage to the woman's body is less, not just because she regains control over her own body sooner, but because the rapist has not successfully reproduced himself.
I'm sort of in between pro-life and pro-choice. I am pro-life, but I don't believe abortion should be illegal (since that doesn't stop it from happening anyway; just makes it more dangerous for the women that have them illegally). I would never get one or encourage someone to get one, but if they chose to do so, I would not judge them or think less of them. If *I* was in that situation, I would probably keep the baby. If someone else is in that situation, the choice is theirs.
_________________
Diagnosed with classic Autism
AQ score= 48
PDD assessment score= 170 (severe PDD)
EQ=8 SQ=93 (Extreme Systemizer)
Alexithymia Quiz=164/185 (high)
I disagree. There have been women who have been raped and made the decision to keep the baby. They are not embracing the rapist at all, but choosing to embrace a life that is directly a part of themselves as well.
_________________
Diagnosed with classic Autism
AQ score= 48
PDD assessment score= 170 (severe PDD)
EQ=8 SQ=93 (Extreme Systemizer)
Alexithymia Quiz=164/185 (high)