Page 97 of 214 [ 3415 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 ... 214  Next

jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

03 Mar 2017, 9:53 pm

There have been lots of comments, mostly from Jacoby, claiming that Hillary would have sent us into war. I was responding to those statements.

Sorry I didn't make that clear. I was interested in your reply to the second part of my post.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

03 Mar 2017, 10:13 pm

jrjones9933 wrote:
There have been lots of comments, mostly from Jacoby, claiming that Hillary would have sent us into war. I was responding to those statements.

Sorry I didn't make that clear. I was interested in your reply to the second part of my post.


Oh I see. Understood.



jrjones9933
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 May 2011
Age: 55
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,144
Location: The end of the northwest passage

03 Mar 2017, 11:17 pm

The Trump administration has not learned from history. Letting a story trickle out will make you look worse than coming clean.


_________________
"I find that the best way [to increase self-confidence] is to lie to yourself about who you are, what you've done, and where you're going." - Richard Ayoade


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Mar 2017, 1:18 am

I am honestly not that impressed with Sessions's alleged perjury. It was clear that Franken was asking that question in the context of the 2016 campaign, and whether Sessions was sending messages between Trump and the Russians. Likely, Sessions did not think of the 2 legitimate meetings he had with the Russian ambassador, with whom many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have met and probably just one of many countries' ambassadors he's met, because it didn't fit within that context. So I'm just not seeing the intent to lie and mislead.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

04 Mar 2017, 1:43 am

beneficii wrote:
I am honestly not that impressed with Sessions's alleged perjury. It was clear that Franken was asking that question in the context of the 2016 campaign, and whether Sessions was sending messages between Trump and the Russians. Likely, Sessions did not think of the 2 legitimate meetings he had with the Russian ambassador, with whom many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have met and probably just one of many countries' ambassadors he's met, because it didn't fit within that context. So I'm just not seeing the intent to lie and mislead.


There's nothing legitimate with this as has been the case with the whole series of Russia connection allegations.
I think the plan is to build a false history of scandal to bring up in 2020. There's always been a very obvious intended goal to either remove the President from office or to keep him from being reelected.



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,694
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

04 Mar 2017, 4:18 am

EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
I am honestly not that impressed with Sessions's alleged perjury. It was clear that Franken was asking that question in the context of the 2016 campaign, and whether Sessions was sending messages between Trump and the Russians. Likely, Sessions did not think of the 2 legitimate meetings he had with the Russian ambassador, with whom many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have met and probably just one of many countries' ambassadors he's met, because it didn't fit within that context. So I'm just not seeing the intent to lie and mislead.


There's nothing legitimate with this as has been the case with the whole series of Russia connection allegations.
I think the plan is to build a false history of scandal to bring up in 2020. There's always been a very obvious intended goal to either remove the President from office or to keep him from being reelected.


Kinda like how Republicans didn't want Obama reelected?


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

04 Mar 2017, 5:18 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
I am honestly not that impressed with Sessions's alleged perjury. It was clear that Franken was asking that question in the context of the 2016 campaign, and whether Sessions was sending messages between Trump and the Russians. Likely, Sessions did not think of the 2 legitimate meetings he had with the Russian ambassador, with whom many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have met and probably just one of many countries' ambassadors he's met, because it didn't fit within that context. So I'm just not seeing the intent to lie and mislead.


There's nothing legitimate with this as has been the case with the whole series of Russia connection allegations.
I think the plan is to build a false history of scandal to bring up in 2020. There's always been a very obvious intended goal to either remove the President from office or to keep him from being reelected.


Kinda like how Republicans didn't want Obama reelected?


BOOM! Head shot! :twisted:


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


EzraS
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Sep 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,828
Location: Twin Peaks

04 Mar 2017, 5:34 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
beneficii wrote:
I am honestly not that impressed with Sessions's alleged perjury. It was clear that Franken was asking that question in the context of the 2016 campaign, and whether Sessions was sending messages between Trump and the Russians. Likely, Sessions did not think of the 2 legitimate meetings he had with the Russian ambassador, with whom many members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have met and probably just one of many countries' ambassadors he's met, because it didn't fit within that context. So I'm just not seeing the intent to lie and mislead.


There's nothing legitimate with this as has been the case with the whole series of Russia connection allegations.
I think the plan is to build a false history of scandal to bring up in 2020. There's always been a very obvious intended goal to either remove the President from office or to keep him from being reelected.


Kinda like how Republicans didn't want Obama reelected?


And like how the Democrats didn't want Bush reelected and so on down through history. The point is, that's likely what all the Russia nonsense is over.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

04 Mar 2017, 6:22 am

Time: Donald Trump and the New Dawn of Tyranny

Quote:
We might imagine that the American system must somehow always sustain itself. But a broader look at the history of democratic republics established since our own revolution reveals that most of them have failed. Politicians who emerge from democratic practices can then work to undo democratic institutions. This was true in the rise of fascism in the 1920s and 1930s, as well as during the spread of communism in the 1940s, and indeed in the new wave of authoritarian regime changes of the 21st century. Indeed, absent a truly decisive revolution, which is a rare event, a regime change depends upon such people — regime changers — emerging in one system and transforming it into another.


Quote:
A basic weapon of regime changers, as fascists realized nearly a century ago, is to destroy the concept of truth. Democracy requires the rule of law, the rule of law depends upon trust, and trust depends upon citizens' acceptance of factuality. The president and his aides actively seek to destroy Americans' sense of reality. Not only does the White House spread "alternative facts," but Kellyanne Conway openly proclaims this as right and good. Post-factuality is pre-fascism.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

04 Mar 2017, 6:31 am

I don't care if "most if them failed." Ours hasn't.

Trump is seemingly trying to change that, though.



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

04 Mar 2017, 8:23 am

He's on a tweet spree:

Quote:
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 3m3 minutes ago

Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't voluntarily leaving the Apprentice, he was fired by his bad (pathetic) ratings, not by me. Sad end to great show


Quote:
Donald J. Trump‏Verified account @realDonaldTrump 1h1 hour ago

How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!


He is one strange dude.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

04 Mar 2017, 8:33 am

Obama tapped almost everybody's phone; President Hollande, Chancellor Merkel, now impeached president Dilma down in Brazil, and many more. In all likelihood Obama was spying on Trump and his actions after the election speak to this fact.

time to purge and start holding these criminals responsible



androbot01
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2014
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,746
Location: Kingston, Ontario, Canada

04 Mar 2017, 8:42 am

Jacoby wrote:
time to purge and start holding these criminals responsible

I would not be at all surprised to see Trump end up in jail. I think it will be treason because of his ties to Russia, but it could also be an emoluments violation.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

04 Mar 2017, 8:49 am

androbot01 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
time to purge and start holding these criminals responsible

I would not be at all surprised to see Trump end up in jail. I think it will be treason because of his ties to Russia, but it could also be an emoluments violation.


well now we can be sure that won't happen

it is the deep staters that are the traitors, these people need to be put in jail and likely that is the reason for their treachery



funeralxempire
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2014
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 30,282
Location: Right over your left shoulder

04 Mar 2017, 9:11 am

Jacoby wrote:
androbot01 wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
time to purge and start holding these criminals responsible

I would not be at all surprised to see Trump end up in jail. I think it will be treason because of his ties to Russia, but it could also be an emoluments violation.


well now we can be sure that won't happen

it is the deep staters that are the traitors, these people need to be put in jail and likely that is the reason for their treachery


Oh, let's see where this goes when Loser Donald is charged with treason and his supporters start to insist everyone who doesn't oppose those charges is a traitor.


_________________
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
You can't advance to the next level without stomping on a few Koopas.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

04 Mar 2017, 9:27 am

Trump hasn't committed treason. He's not going to jail.

All this treason talk is hyperbole.

Trump is just a dumbass deal maker at times who sometimes gets his allies wrong.