Sand wrote:
That it makes various life forms miserable is inconsequential to nature as long as it functions. Humans can take credit for the safety pin, the electric light bulb and the interplanetary rocket, but not slavery.
Just because the ants invented slavery, does NOT mean we have to practice it. I prefer machines to slaves. Slaves can cut our throats while we are asleep, machines much less likely so.
As to your pragmatic approach, by and large I agree with it. Many of our moral notions are concoctions and not terribly useful. The sooner we can do away with guilt and shame, the better off we shall be. What we should be doing is practicing constraint which is in line with our logical interests. This is much better than shame and guilt, but it requires the effort of thinking, which is why shame and guilt have priority.
Too bad Nietzche was a tertiary syphlitic. Had he been in his right mind he could have made the above point more clearly and logically.
ruveyn