The God Archetype

Post Reply New Topic

Nope never read him.. I usually come up with ideas then get mad that someone already made them.. A previous doctor of mine compared my thoughts to cognitive sciences, so I might get a textbook on that as well as criminology then maybe onto an overview of terrorism from the perspective of psychology.

My interests are all similar, so I do not know what I will do next after that.. IT will only take 4-5 months to feel I have a good general understanding. Not a professional nor have delusion of knowing anything for certain, subjectivism.

Ok I will take a look this evening..

The internet is becoming boring so I am trying to figure out what to do to talk to smart people. For instance visiting one of the numerous colleges here to sit in on classes, I’d enjoy stumping them all with my thoughts and making the professors feel stupid . Laugh Snort

I just got back from the ocean. I saw a student driver with a teacher, to learn to drive I might have to hire that service, however it seems complicated. I'd rather not drive.

Complexities.

Philosophia is mind origin.

The process in Psychology called Dialectical Reasoning was not developed by Hume.
It was developed by Hegel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegel

Dialectical Reasoning is a fancy term for "Common Sense"
It is where you play the pros and cons against each other for a conclusion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_reasoning

hmm...

A pro and a con cannot really ultimately be determined concerning an originator complex applied to universal origins.

It's really common sense to me, logical and quite clear that for the process of evolution to take place, there would have to be something to have started the process. It perhaps is not easy to accept an always, minds typically from my observations cannot fathom timeless forever-ness. For lack of better terminology, I believe it is a human limitation.

Of course the originator complex in how I have put it can also support a creationist point of view as well. A big bang could still have happened, or really just an event of great change and ciaos. Still yet to have the original process take place, would have to have something exist for it.

The containment of space, the area to me has no limits. It's illogical to say the universe ends, but still a point can exist where either gravitational forces are to great or cease to exist. That however would be on the outer limits of filled space to regions where there is absents of "things".

Psychology has it’s limits..

Yes imagination, but still math is limited and cannot contain such reasonings.. There is no original formula.. Thinking freely as I know I have no clue how gravity maths are or much about some things I'd like to learn.

Remember mind is product of it's environment and collective experience, math was created by mind. The universe contains it...

Math cannot explain origination in this manner, without madness.

CRAZY

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268978/

I watched this movie many times

Just remember this guy.. Math’s and esotericism do not mix. Esoteric (supernatural) really are beyond the stable minded theories. Really the originator complex instead of the mathematical formula for the universe beginning from a point of singularity (event) as mind did (birth or prenatal *sensation feeling*). It all psychologically explains mind origination as the universes origination like the point of origination of the theoretical imagined universe. Time psychologically is really of mind and external change and process. Yet beyond the conditioned mind from awareness and societal programming what is not known is simply imagined into.

A great wisdom exists in these simple unknowns...So does a great madness or possibly. Yet the universe in origin though infinite like the universe is wide countless and numerous it’s within depth never stopping.

I'd draw a mental picture of a hand holding a marble universe and each marble containing infinite other universes.. Nothing of it can be believed: P

Least I know with religion it can be directed like a movie, no not like Hollywood but in its programmers. Sort of odd language, no I am not intending to say a software is minds, but rather that social evolution can change with numerous groups or types of beliefs at a time as certain truths are found amass. So it may stabilize or self-destruct itself, change and or settle or unsettle.

When no belief exists, so does the cold of heart, lack of passion, reduce respects and horrid humanities. No not all the time, but it is true none the less. IT might be a fragile balance for even what is both non-belief and belief both have its extremes, its negative and positives. Yet destiny is simply imagined, like jello all wiggly or a bolder rock or a pebble in a pond, society as a whole.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0268978/

That movie made me cry, no joking.
Russel Crowe deserved the award.

Hyperbaric biosphere, age is highly environmental.

16 concerning what context of the conversation?