Orwell wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
greenblue wrote:
AngelRho wrote:
But implying that Metallica are a good band is only imagined?
well, it depends on what is our criteria to conclude that it is a good band, is it succes? is it fame? is it because the performers are sexy? is it because the music is good to our ears? is it because of artistic merits regarding composition and innovation?
Or how about the level of awesomeness that has never been achieved before or since?
Are you somehow confusing Metallica with Dvořák?
OK... My first instinct is to not respond AT ALL because I just happen to know, with your musical background, you have all the aesthetic sensibilities of a camel sphincter. HOWEVER, because I also know that there be yet those untainted by such vile blasphemy, I'm COMPELLED to respond to ensure this never comes to pass.
Your precious Duh-Voor-Jack was covering Metallica songs with his own metal band over a hundred years before Lars Ulrich was even a twinkle in his mother's eye. I can see them all now in their pre-incarnate greatness jamming together. But Duh-Voor-Jack had the unfortunate fate of being born at time when the most he could possibly hope for was to write a couple of dinky little symphonies. I'm very sure he looked forward to his own death when he could return to Valhalla and never again lament or mourn the greatness that could never be in his earthly lifetime.
Besides, Duh-Voor-Jack wasn't even really that great a composer. You need to listen to REAL music by composers like Carl Maria von Weber and Richard Wagner.