Scrapheap wrote:
"This is cerainly true of atheists who adopt science as their religion. The same is not true of those who only see science as privisionaly true. "
sc wrote:
But it's not true, it's just science with the acceptence dispite illogicality of origination. So that's why I call it a complex.
I don't see the "Big Bang" as simply being based on origination. The Big Bang is based on reverse-engineering. Cosmologists have simply taken the laws of nature and turned the clock backwards. I do the same thing every day as a Machinist/Engineer in the racing industry. I take parts made by competitors and ask myself, "Well, how did they make this??" I'm certianly not using the "illogicality of origination" to figure out how to duplicate what's in my hand. Cosmologists use the same methodology that I do. This isn't to say that the Big Bang is correct, just as my firt atempt to duplicate a part may result in failure. But since science is self correcting, errors in the theory will be corrected as evidence becomes available.
_________________
All hail Comrade Napoleon!! !
24 May 2006, 2:44 pm
