Jacoby wrote:
Rehabilitation is great but only for non-violent criminals. I don't even really believe in incarceration for non-violent criminals honestly. However, I don't believe murderers, rapists, etc. can ever be reintegrated. I don't see it purely for revenge, I liken it more to putting down a rabid dog They're sick and society must be protected.
If protection would be the priority,
prevention would be the rational choice. The crime is done, and if you are worried that they can escape because they are not put to death, there are 2 parameters that contradict this:
- Death row prisoners spend 8 to 15 years in jail, mostly because the procedure is way more complex in order to
prevent the execution of an innocent. They still can escape.
- If a prisoner sentenced for life escapes, the means to
prevents him from escaping failed.
Prevent, prevent, prevent.. see the pattern?
Humanity sucks at preventing, and instead of working rationally on the causes, instead people prefer to imagine stuff, make up goofy rationalizations of the consequences. And this self-destructive pattern is present everywhere. Welcome to Sparta!
![geek :geek:](./images/smilies/icon_geek.gif)
EDIT:
Quote:
I don't think there is much correlation between the two. Australia is, for the most part, an isolated homogeneous island in the south Pacific. I think high crime rate in the US has much much more to do with our draconian drug laws than anything.
Stop thinking, bring some evidence. If not I will think you are just trying to make up goofy rationalizations.