John_Browning
Veteran
Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,456
Location: The shooting range
28 Mar 2011, 12:34 am
28 Mar 2011, 12:35 am
28 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
28 Mar 2011, 10:31 am
28 Mar 2011, 10:32 am
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
28 Mar 2011, 10:41 am
28 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
28 Mar 2011, 10:58 am
28 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
28 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
Bethie
Veteran
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,817
Location: My World, Highview, Louisville, Kentucky, USA, Earth, The Milky Way, Local Group, Local Supercluster
28 Mar 2011, 11:09 am
Inuyasha wrote:
Keep telling yourself that, if you want to see a news corporation lieing look at the New York Times. Seriously, do you really want to get me started in picking apart, NY Times, the AP, Reuters, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc.
Aaaand still a tu quoque....
Inuyasha wrote:
I did a whole report on media bias and dishonesty, including how the aforementioned organizations (in this paragraph) have lied and used doctored photos.
Oh. Well in that case:
Last edited by Bethie on 28 Mar 2011, 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
28 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
28 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
Bethie wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Keep telling yourself that, if you want to see a news corporation lieing look at the New York Times.
Aaaand still a tu quoque....
In English, and why do I get the feeling that if translated it will be something that is arguably flamebait...
Bethie wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
Seriously, do you really want to get me started in picking apart, NY Times, the AP, Reuters, BBC, CNN, MSNBC, etc. I did a whole report on media bias and dishonesty, including how the aforementioned organizations (in this paragraph) have lied and used doctored photos.
Oh. Well in that case:
I'm pointing out if you really want to see News Organizations actually lieing, when I next get a chance to dig up my old research I would be more than happy to oblige.
28 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
For both of you claiming to be so smart you can be incredibly dense sometimes. By reacting like they are, they are making themselves (Soros and Mediamatters) look guilty and scared.
Actually you don't have to be too smart to see that your arguments are 100% illogical. Most preschoolers would recognize it. I bet even you know that your claim is a steaming bull pie.
Sure whatever, this may not be recognizable to most people on the spectrum but when one starts screaming and carrying on about what someone says instead of simply shrugging it off, it can often be a good indication of guilt. Most people on the spectrum tend to not recognize this.
Actually people tend not to "shrug it off" when someone constantly lies and distorts the truth and appears to get away with it. To the contrary, they tend to get outraged at the one perpetuating the lies and distortions. This is a perfectly viable explanation for the left's anger at Fox News. Whether or not you believe Fox actually distorts the truth is irrelevent. The point is the left beleives that Fox News IS distorting the truth and thus they are outraged
Quote:
marshall wrote:
Saying that Soros and Mediamatters are wetting their panties because they know deep down that Fox News is "right" and they are "wrong" is nothing but a childish taunt / bluster. Oohhh, you're just mad because you're scared that I'm right. 
It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".
It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".You really don't get it, Soros and mediamatters are acting like they are having a temper tantrum. It is almost like a little child screaming they aren't getting their way, or after having been caught doing something they weren't supposed to.
You may be intelligent, but you are still unable to pick up the clues as to when you're being deceived, when someone is lieing, or when someone feels backed into a corner. This is a common failing for people on the spectrum, even the smartest of us can be easily duped. I'm not saying I'm perfect at picking up on these tells, some NTs are better at lieing than others, that said I am probably better at picking up on some of these things than you are.
The people at Media Matters and George Soros are acting like they have been backed into a corner, not just angry over being made fun of.
Most socially astute people know that this style of pseudo-psychoanalysis is simply one of many childish ad-hominem tactics used to get under an opponents skin by being as brazenly patronizing as possible. The accuracy of the said psychoanalysis is irrelevant to the effectiveness of the ad-hominem attack. The only purpose is to gloat and make your opponent madder.
In any case I'm pretty sure you're more impaired in the theory-of-mind department than I am. Whether or not AS is a factor, your blind partisanship is the main contributing factor. You really aught to leave the psychoanalysis to your shrink.
28 Mar 2011, 11:37 am
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
For both of you claiming to be so smart you can be incredibly dense sometimes. By reacting like they are, they are making themselves (Soros and Mediamatters) look guilty and scared.
Actually you don't have to be too smart to see that your arguments are 100% illogical. Most preschoolers would recognize it. I bet even you know that your claim is a steaming bull pie.
Sure whatever, this may not be recognizable to most people on the spectrum but when one starts screaming and carrying on about what someone says instead of simply shrugging it off, it can often be a good indication of guilt. Most people on the spectrum tend to not recognize this.
Actually people tend not to "shrug it off" when someone constantly lies and distorts the truth and appears to get away with it. To the contrary, they tend to get outraged at the one perpetuating the lies and distortions. This is a perfectly viable explanation for the left's anger at Fox News. Whether or not you believe Fox actually distorts the truth is irrelevent. The point is the left beleives that Fox News IS distorting the truth and thus they are outraged
Except for the fact that Beck actually posts up his sources for other people to look at, and the sources do check out... So your explanation is just another load of garbage.
marshall wrote:
Quote:
marshall wrote:
Saying that Soros and Mediamatters are wetting their panties because they know deep down that Fox News is "right" and they are "wrong" is nothing but a childish taunt / bluster. Oohhh, you're just mad because you're scared that I'm right. It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".
It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".You really don't get it, Soros and mediamatters are acting like they are having a temper tantrum. It is almost like a little child screaming they aren't getting their way, or after having been caught doing something they weren't supposed to.
You may be intelligent, but you are still unable to pick up the clues as to when you're being deceived, when someone is lieing, or when someone feels backed into a corner. This is a common failing for people on the spectrum, even the smartest of us can be easily duped. I'm not saying I'm perfect at picking up on these tells, some NTs are better at lieing than others, that said I am probably better at picking up on some of these things than you are.
The people at Media Matters and George Soros are acting like they have been backed into a corner, not just angry over being made fun of.
Most socially astute people know that this style of pseudo-psychoanalysis is simply one of many childish ad-hominem tactics used to get under an opponents skin by being as brazenly patronizing as possible. The accuracy of the said psychoanalysis is irrelevant to the effectiveness of the ad-hominem attack. The only purpose is to gloat and make your opponent madder.
In any case I'm pretty sure you're more impaired in the theory-of-mind department than I am. Whether or not AS is a factor, your blind partisanship is the main contributing factor. You really aught to leave the psychoanalysis to your shrink.
Sure whatever, how about you look at the language being used by mediamatters. There are some pretty good tells as to the fact they have simply become unhinged.
28 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
marshall wrote:
Inuyasha wrote:
For both of you claiming to be so smart you can be incredibly dense sometimes. By reacting like they are, they are making themselves (Soros and Mediamatters) look guilty and scared.
Actually you don't have to be too smart to see that your arguments are 100% illogical. Most preschoolers would recognize it. I bet even you know that your claim is a steaming bull pie.
Sure whatever, this may not be recognizable to most people on the spectrum but when one starts screaming and carrying on about what someone says instead of simply shrugging it off, it can often be a good indication of guilt. Most people on the spectrum tend to not recognize this.
Actually people tend not to "shrug it off" when someone constantly lies and distorts the truth and appears to get away with it. To the contrary, they tend to get outraged at the one perpetuating the lies and distortions. This is a perfectly viable explanation for the left's anger at Fox News. Whether or not you believe Fox actually distorts the truth is irrelevent. The point is the left beleives that Fox News IS distorting the truth and thus they are outraged
Except for the fact that Beck actually posts up his sources for other people to look at, and the sources do check out... So your explanation is just another load of garbage.
Do you have the reading comprehension of a pre-schooler?
Quote:
marshall wrote:
Quote:
marshall wrote:
Saying that Soros and Mediamatters are wetting their panties because they know deep down that Fox News is "right" and they are "wrong" is nothing but a childish taunt / bluster. Oohhh, you're just mad because you're scared that I'm right. It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".
It's a bit like saying "I know you are but what am I" or calling George Soros and Mediamatters "poopy heads".You really don't get it, Soros and mediamatters are acting like they are having a temper tantrum. It is almost like a little child screaming they aren't getting their way, or after having been caught doing something they weren't supposed to.
You may be intelligent, but you are still unable to pick up the clues as to when you're being deceived, when someone is lieing, or when someone feels backed into a corner. This is a common failing for people on the spectrum, even the smartest of us can be easily duped. I'm not saying I'm perfect at picking up on these tells, some NTs are better at lieing than others, that said I am probably better at picking up on some of these things than you are.
The people at Media Matters and George Soros are acting like they have been backed into a corner, not just angry over being made fun of.
Most socially astute people know that this style of pseudo-psychoanalysis is simply one of many childish ad-hominem tactics used to get under an opponents skin by being as brazenly patronizing as possible. The accuracy of the said psychoanalysis is irrelevant to the effectiveness of the ad-hominem attack. The only purpose is to gloat and make your opponent madder.
In any case I'm pretty sure you're more impaired in the theory-of-mind department than I am. Whether or not AS is a factor, your blind partisanship is the main contributing factor. You really aught to leave the psychoanalysis to your shrink.
Sure whatever, how about you look at the language being used by mediamatters. There are some pretty good tells as to the fact they have simply become unhinged.
Whenever you say "sure whatever" I take it as a concession that I got you cornered and you have nothing more creative to use in rebuttal. Hasta la vista...
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| Do you think getting diagnosed matters? |
20 Dec 2024, 3:29 pm |
| Best Representation I've Seen in Media |
26 Oct 2024, 6:21 pm |
| I sometimes feel that social media should never have existed |
28 Nov 2024, 9:45 pm |
| X users jump to Bluesky (social media) |
28 Nov 2024, 7:15 am |
