Jacoby wrote:
What happened on that island sounds horrifying, like straight out of a horror movie. Hopefully the perpetrator(s) are put to death.
He won't, he'll most likely will get "forvaring" ( search for "Involuntary commitment" on wikipedia, I'm prevented from using links for some reason), which is prison with a minimum sentence that can be extended indefinitely if still considered dangerous, effectively potential lifelong inprisonment. This is the maximum penalty possible in norway, but it's not considered a punishment as such, but a way to contain dangerous individuals. Normal prison is limited to 21 years (also called "livstid" meaning "lifetime" which is not really correct), which is regarder as a "punishment" but with the intention of rehabilitation. Our legal system is based on rehabilitation and protecting the society against dangerous people, not revenge as it seems the thinking is in USA.
I personally think (as most Norwegians) feel death penalty is inhumane and immoral as it's illogical to kill someone if we think killing is wrong (and if someone is incorrectly found guilty, killing them makes the incorrect judgement horribly worse). For a spree killer, I think letting them die or killing them is too kind, a quick and easy way out (especially as spree killers often kill themself anyway), while indefinite containment is much more of a punishment, because they have to live with what they have done. And even if he cannot feel any regret, having him locked up and kept from doing anyone more harm is what a civilized society should do.
---
Although the bomb was terrifying, I fell that the shooting disguised as a policeman was (even before the death toll were updated) orders of magnitude worse. How cruel to abuse the authority and resect we have for the police uniform to do such horrible murders. A bomb is horrible and evil, but in a way a somewhat understandable and "normal" type of terrorism, but the cruelty of abusing the trust of young people and killing them up close and personal is just horrible.