Page 2 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Sep 2011, 4:22 am

naturalplastic wrote:

As rendered into English it can only mean that "witches are so evil that they are pathetic and killing them is the right because it puts them out of their misery (like putting down an animal)."


That is not what the Hebrew of the TNKH says. Not at all. Only Gentiles could screw up a simple passage so thoroughly.

ruveyn



Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,506
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Sep 2011, 6:05 am

ruveyn wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:

As rendered into English it can only mean that "witches are so evil that they are pathetic and killing them is the right because it puts them out of their misery (like putting down an animal)."


That is not what the Hebrew of the TNKH says. Not at all. Only Gentiles could screw up a simple passage so thoroughly.

ruveyn


well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Sep 2011, 6:35 am

Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

15 Sep 2011, 10:08 am

ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn


so Rebbe whats your translation?


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

15 Sep 2011, 11:42 am

91 wrote:
shrox wrote:
What do you call a 17th century girl who is good at math?


Margaret Cavendish


+2


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,506
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

15 Sep 2011, 11:51 am

ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn


In Salem, fourteen women, and five men. A few died in prison awaiting execution.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer



shrox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,295
Location: OK let's go.

15 Sep 2011, 12:03 pm

91 wrote:
shrox wrote:
What do you call a 17th century girl who is good at math?


Margaret Cavendish


Good one!



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

15 Sep 2011, 12:29 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn


so Rebbe whats your translation?


Don't afford a hag/poisoner/spell-caster a living. Which is NOT the same as kill the hag. It means do not employ the hag.

King Saul fudged and employed the Hag of Ein Dor.



JakobVirgil
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,744
Location: yes

15 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm

ruveyn wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn


so Rebbe whats your translation?


Don't afford a hag/poisoner/spell-caster a living. Which is NOT the same as kill the hag. It means do not employ the hag.

King Saul fudged and employed the Hag of Ein Dor.


that was the gist that I took from it.


_________________
?We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots??

http://jakobvirgil.blogspot.com/


LiendaBalla
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Age: 46
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,736

15 Sep 2011, 7:23 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
I am thinking the intention was don't help witches or employ them.
Too bad so many people had to burn over a little verse.


No wander some people see religious agenda, right? Alot of groups do that with their verses all the time. kind of.



androbot2084
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,447

15 Sep 2011, 8:49 pm

One Witch i know thinks the Bible sucks because she thinks it calls for the death penalty for Witches.



AngelRho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile

16 Sep 2011, 1:46 pm

JakobVirgil wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
JakobVirgil wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:

well, you do have to consider that Hebrew is hardly our language.
All the more reason to hold literal inerrancy of scripture, when you're talking about translations, as suspect.

-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


Absolutely. Translations are at best approximations.

That is why I read TNKH in Hebrew and Aramaic (the book of Daniel is in Aramaic).

Combine approximations with a theological agenda and one has a train wreck. How many haggish women died in New England because of the Puritan Agenda?

ruveyn


so Rebbe whats your translation?


Don't afford a hag/poisoner/spell-caster a living. Which is NOT the same as kill the hag. It means do not employ the hag.

King Saul fudged and employed the Hag of Ein Dor.


that was the gist that I took from it.

Ok...so why is that particular hag portrayed as being in fear for her life once she found out who it was employing her?

Also, sorcery is a forbidden practice, probably because it attempts to manipulate the spirit world, at worst presuming to make the practitioner equal to or greater than a deity, not to mention infidelity to YHWH. And YHWH commands that no form of idolatry is to be tolerated in the Holy Land. The command in conquering Canaan was to wipe out all those remaining in the land, killing them if they could not be at least forcibly deported. It isn't unreasonable to conclude that sorcery, being an act of treachery in this context, is punishable by death within the borders of a theocracy composed of God's covenant people.

The evidence suggests the crime of necromancy is punishable by death. "Do not allow a [witch/poisoner/hag/magician/sorcerer/necromancer] to live" seems plenty plausible to me.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Sep 2011, 2:58 pm

AngelRho wrote:
The evidence suggests the crime of necromancy is punishable by death. "Do not allow a [witch/poisoner/hag/magician/sorcerer/necromancer] to live" seems plenty plausible to me.


That could but but it ain't what the Hebrew verse says. The verb form is the causative.

ruveyn



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,858
Location: Stendec

16 Sep 2011, 2:59 pm

Is the purpose of this thread to either find or present justification (or both) for killing witches?


_________________
 
The previous signature line has been cancelled.


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

16 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm

Fnord wrote:
Is the purpose of this thread to either find or present justification (or both) for killing witches?


I hope not.

ruveyn



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,858
Location: Stendec

16 Sep 2011, 3:06 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Fnord wrote:
Is the purpose of this thread to either find or present justification (or both) for killing witches?
I hope not.

Same here. I'd hate to see Nigerian Witch Hunts spread to other parts of the world.


_________________
 
The previous signature line has been cancelled.