abacacus wrote:
VIDEODROME wrote:
I could see maybe dissecting the cadavers but not experimenting on the living prisoners.
Theirs crimes have stripped them of humanity and any rights they may have been entitled too in my mind... why do we feed them, keep them alive? They have destroyed other peoples lives (especially the child molesters) and yet we treat them relatively well out of some misguided idea of ethics and morality...
There are many innocent people in prison (and in the USA, some innocent people end up on the electric chair).
Let's take child abuse, for example. It is hard to believe that people might be innocently accused of such a crime, but it happens occasionally. I've recently read about the case of an Austrian man who spent 8 years in jail for the alleged repeated sexual abuse of his stepdaughter over the course of several years. His stepdaughter has now, at age 25, finally decided to tell the truth. Her accusations were completely made up, she just wanted to get rid of him. (The German news article can be found
here).
There have also been false accusations of rape (the
Duke lacrosse case, for example), and countless people have been wrongly convicted of murder. It is bad enough when innocent people spend years in jail before they are proven innocent. Society can never make this up to them, but at least they are still alive and physically unharmed when the truth comes out.
That's the main reason why killing or torturing of or experimenting on prison inmates is highly unethical and can't possibly be justified. Also, someone would have to perform this torture / medical experiments, and people who would do something like this are just as unfit to live in our society as a convicted criminal.