Page 2 of 4 [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

CrazyCatLord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2011
Age: 54
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,177

17 Jan 2012, 7:46 am

abacacus wrote:
VIDEODROME wrote:
I could see maybe dissecting the cadavers but not experimenting on the living prisoners.


Theirs crimes have stripped them of humanity and any rights they may have been entitled too in my mind... why do we feed them, keep them alive? They have destroyed other peoples lives (especially the child molesters) and yet we treat them relatively well out of some misguided idea of ethics and morality...


There are many innocent people in prison (and in the USA, some innocent people end up on the electric chair).

Let's take child abuse, for example. It is hard to believe that people might be innocently accused of such a crime, but it happens occasionally. I've recently read about the case of an Austrian man who spent 8 years in jail for the alleged repeated sexual abuse of his stepdaughter over the course of several years. His stepdaughter has now, at age 25, finally decided to tell the truth. Her accusations were completely made up, she just wanted to get rid of him. (The German news article can be found here).

There have also been false accusations of rape (the Duke lacrosse case, for example), and countless people have been wrongly convicted of murder. It is bad enough when innocent people spend years in jail before they are proven innocent. Society can never make this up to them, but at least they are still alive and physically unharmed when the truth comes out.

That's the main reason why killing or torturing of or experimenting on prison inmates is highly unethical and can't possibly be justified. Also, someone would have to perform this torture / medical experiments, and people who would do something like this are just as unfit to live in our society as a convicted criminal.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 50
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

17 Jan 2012, 8:09 am

Plus the vast majority of people in prison are going to get out someday and it would be better to try to reform them rather than do things to them that will make them even worse when they get out. Being in prison doesn't always make you a bad person even if you are guilty. Sometimes people do stupid things and learn from their mistakes. When I was 18 I got arrested for a non violent felony and if I had tried to fight it and been convicted I could have gotten 1-3 years during which I probably would have been beaten up and raped and maybe killed.. Considering how horrible prison already is I don't think any extra punishment is required or maybe I've been watching too much Oz (one of my favorite tv shows ever).

I don't really have a problem with experimenting on prisoners as long as it's voluntary and the chance of fatal or really horrible side effects are small or nonexistent. They had a story line like that on Oz and one or two of the prisoners died.



Mindslave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Nov 2010
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,034
Location: Where the wild things wish they were

17 Jan 2012, 8:27 am

NathanealWest wrote:
Uhh, serial killers do it for the power. Where's the power in experimenting on a condemned prisoner?


Gee, I dunno. Where is the power in experimenting on a guy who isn't even considered to be human anyway? Every society has its 'undesirables" that we can mistreat. Now we use psychology to justify these things. At what point is a "scientific study" going to come out that clearly states that all humans are human?



cathylynn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,045
Location: northeast US

17 Jan 2012, 9:05 am

criminals are criminals because they inherited bad genes and bad circumstances. there but for the grace of god, go i. who's to say if you or faced what they faced, we would not do the same. overwhelming scientific evedence is that we would do the same. how can you mistreat someone whose major crime is being as human as you are? lock them up to prevent further crimes, yes. mistreat them as vengeance, never.



bumble
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,073

17 Jan 2012, 9:08 am

This thread is somewhat disturbing.



NathanealWest
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jan 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 258

17 Jan 2012, 9:15 am

Mindslave wrote:
NathanealWest wrote:
Uhh, serial killers do it for the power. Where's the power in experimenting on a condemned prisoner?


Gee, I dunno. Where is the power in experimenting on a guy who isn't even considered to be human anyway? Every society has its 'undesirables" that we can mistreat. Now we use psychology to justify these things. At what point is a "scientific study" going to come out that clearly states that all humans are human?


I was suggesting this his argument that this could put serial killers onto a path where they're not destroying people is bogus. Serial killers like to trick and trap their prey. Look at Ted Bundy, he essentially killed his victims with the trust they put into him.



marginalized
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 2 Jan 2012
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 18

17 Jan 2012, 9:38 am

In the US, there is a clause in the constitution about "cruel and unusual" punishments. That is why we can't experiment on prisoners. So, you are asking the wrong question. You should be asking "Why does the constitution prevent us from experimenting on prisoners?".



Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 69,612
Location: Over there

17 Jan 2012, 9:44 am

[Moved from General Autism Discussion to Politics, Philosophy, and Religion]


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.


puddingmouse
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,777
Location: Cottonopolis

17 Jan 2012, 10:01 am

I don't worry that I've got APD or psychopathy, but I do think there is something wrong with my emotional reaction to certain things.

I can't actually think of anything wrong with abortion. I seriously have no emotions on the topic. I feel the same way about eugenic abortions of babies with birth defects - i.e. I don't feel anything. Nada. Zilch. I'm not like 'Wooo yay! Go abortion!' just :|

Even if they actually developed a prenatal test for autism and decided to wipe it off the face of the planet through eugenic abortion, I'd be like :| . Whereas others are like, 'Noooooooo, I would never have been born!'

EDIT: and as for your example, I think it's worse than just having the death penalty, which I don't support. I still feel empathy for criminals even though they have none for me. Life imprisonment isn't ideal but it at least removes them from society. If society starts to give psychopathic criminals a taste of their own medicine, then society itself becomes psychopathic.


_________________
Zombies, zombies will tear us apart...again.


Bun
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jan 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,356

17 Jan 2012, 11:25 am

mar00 wrote:
First off Mengele didn't understand a thing and it wasn't criminals that he tortured. Wrong example.

What do you mean 'didn't understand a thing?'


_________________
Double X and proud of it / male pronouns : he, him, his


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

17 Jan 2012, 12:35 pm

I worry a great deal about psychopathy, particularly when I am being pursued by a deranged homicidal lunatic.

ruveyn



abacacus
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,380

17 Jan 2012, 12:57 pm

I know Mengele didn't experiment on criminals, I used his name more in the way of suggesting that kind of experiment.

Sure some innocent people land in prison, but they are the minority. I'm not saying experiment on EVERY criminal, but those whose crimes destroy lives. I don't understand how we can value their life after they have shown that they don't value anyone else's lives. Why keep someone who has killed 15 people alive? Why do they deserve to live more than their victims?


_________________
A shot gun blast into the face of deceit
You'll gain your just reward.
We'll not rest until the purge is complete
You will reap what you've sown.


donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

17 Jan 2012, 1:53 pm

abacacus wrote:
It's something I've been accused of several times, and in many ways I suppose I fit.

It really hit home today when I realised I was wondering why we don't perform medical experiments (ala Josef Mengele) on convicted murderers, rapists, child molesters and such.

We could learn so much, like he did, and yet we refuse to.... and for the life of me I cannot understand why.


Because we're not (complete) barbarians? Criminals have rights too.



donnie_darko
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,981

17 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm

Callista wrote:
We don't experiment on them because of how important it is to our modern society that the value we put on human life be truly universal.

That is: We have a need to be absolutely firm about stating that every single human being is equally valuable. If we don't affirm this idea, our society starts to lose its cohesiveness as gaps grow between people considered more or less valuable than others. In practice, we don't everyone equally, but when we are made aware of it, we are usually ashamed of it.

The danger of putting any human being below any other in intrinsic value--even a murderer--is that it implies to people in general that their own position as a valuable human being is not assured. They start to spend more energy on protecting themselves and their subgroup, and less on contributing to society.

In order to live in a cooperative world, we have to view each other as equals. If we don't, society we get what we've had for most of human history--a world where most people are inferior to a small group of superior people, and only the superior people get to make lasting contributions.


This is why authoritarian societies tend to execute people and more horizontal ones do not ---- capital punishment, and torture are part of a system where all humans are NOT equal.



OliveOilMom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 11,447
Location: About 50 miles past the middle of nowhere

17 Jan 2012, 2:06 pm

I think we should do things like drug trials, experemental procedures etc in prisons, but ONLY on a volunteer basis, and only on people that those drugs/procedures have the potential to help. I think that if a prisoner volunteers, they should get decent medical treatment and of course anesthesia and pain meds for any procedures and in some cases extra privelages in the prison for volunteering.

I also think that if a death row convict is healthy, they should have the option of donating their organs instead of the lethal injection type of execution. They could be given extra privelages for this as well.


_________________
I'm giving it another shot. We will see.
My forum is still there and everyone is welcome to come join as well. There is a private women only subforum there if anyone is interested. Also, there is no CAPTCHA. ;-)

The link to the forum is http://www.rightplanet.proboards.com


snapcap
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,328

17 Jan 2012, 2:18 pm

OliveOilMom wrote:
I also think that if a death row convict is healthy, they should have the option of donating their organs instead of the lethal injection type of execution. They could be given extra privelages for this as well.


Would you be OK with receiving a donated organ from a death row inmate?

abacacus wrote:
It's something I've been accused of several times, and in many ways I suppose I fit.

It really hit home today when I realised I was wondering why we don't perform medical experiments (ala Josef Mengele) on convicted murderers, rapists, child molesters and such.

We could learn so much, like he did, and yet we refuse to.... and for the life of me I cannot understand why.


What about Gitmo detainees?


_________________
*some atheist walks outside and picks up stick*

some atheist to stick: "You're like me!"