AstroGeek wrote:
But for a local representative it is extremely possible.
Very much so. Around here, there wouldn't be much disadvantage at all really. At provincial or federal level there are political parties, and a candidate has to be nominated by his riding association just to run (unless running as an independant, which is even harder) - and that's only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the kind of social networking these people have to do.
But municipal politics is different. There are no political parties, no riding associations - everyone is effectively an independant. Usually candidates for city council show up for one or two debates and they might get an interview on local television, but hardly anyone watches either of these things. Some go door to door, but only a few do this. Mostly, municipal candidates communicate through the newspaper and that's how most people make their decisions, by looking at what their positions are. It actually tends to be that voting and campaigning are more logical and rational in municipal politics, and popularity/charisma plays a much reduced role.
Many parties actually run failed provincial or federal candidates through municipal elections (unofficially), because they know that being unelectable in provincial/federal elections doesn't mean much in terms of municipal elections. Mayor, however, is a bit more difficult than city councillor and tends to be more like getting elected at the provincial/federal level, especially for mayor of a major urban centre.