Geekonychus wrote:
Also, Zimmerman is gun rights hero and clearly a responsible gun owner who's being unfairly attacked. I'll defend him unquestionably no matter how much he proves me wrong. The way he exercises his god given right to point guns at unarmed teenagers and uppity women and gets away with it makes me all wet and sticky.
Fixed Further. You're welcome.
Geekonychus wrote:
I think it's hard (if not impossible) for someone like Dox to get that kind of logic. NRA types (and conversely anti-NRA) types tend to have a serious blindspot whenever second amendment/gun violence type issues come up.
Based on his numerous impassioned posts, it's clear he has a raging hard-on for Zimmerman.
If you'd actually
read any of those posts, you'd know that what I was defending was the presumption of innocence and the due process of the law, not Zimmerman, so I have to conclude that you're illiterate, an idiot, or someone with enough of a raging hard-on for
me to lie about something that's easily disproved through the posting records in order to launch a personal attack; care to shed some light on which one it is?
I don't think I even mentioned gun rights in relationship to this case, but since you're clearly shooting from the hip with the truth here, I suppose that doesn't really matter. Maybe you can go back through the posts and check for me, it would do you good to actually do your due diligence before launching an ill conceived personal attack.
_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.
- Rick Sanchez