Kurgan wrote:
Inventor wrote:
Faith based science belongs in PPR. I would settle for any evidence, that something is happening.
I doubt we have anything on 99% of reality. I like what we do have, drop something it falls, these things are useful.
I agree Red Shift happens, but disagree about the reason.
That is close enough for Science, but PPR lacks any agreed evidence.
While we can't prove it directly, we can show that it's theoretically possible. The theory is incomplete, though, but we will definetely have more answers in a few years.
http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/t ... heory.htmlPlease be aware of the fact that something can be plausible just because it can't be proven directly; you have to weigh it against the alternatives by applying Occam's Razor.
I see it like Mathematics. Most of what we know can be reduced to a calculation. It seems great, but does not explain all those other math answers, for which we have no data. Is there something there?
So the math is there for many points that are voids.
By Occam's Razor, the simplest answer is there is nothing there.
A Theory+Math, there is still no data to support it not being a void.
Why I disagree with Red Shift, as far as it calls for the Universe flying apart at near the speed of light, yet having no effect on the Gravity that holds things together. The Milky Way is not flinging bits off on the outer rim. An expanding Universe would have a declining Gravity, and we can see back for billions of years. No evidence yet.
My Math says, Newtons and Teslas are rare, unemployed people with advanced degrees are common,
The range of gravity is infinite (i.e. the space-time curvature becomes smaller and smaller, but it never becomes zero). The acceleration of the universe stems from dark energy. If the universe was not expanding with an accelerating rate, everything would still be an infinitely dense singularity.
01 Nov 2013, 10:59 pm
