heavenlyabyss wrote:
Fnord wrote:
They talk about being a psychopath as if it was a bad thing ...
Lol. Just thought I'd point this comment out.
I think it is pretty funny.
And no, I do not agree with Fnord. But I think this comment deserves to be pointed out.
Actually, it is not just for laughs.
Here are the psychopathy traits from the current PCL-R (Psychopathy Check-List Revised)
Facet 1: Interpersonal
Glibness/superficial charm
Grandiose sense of self-worth
Pathological lying
Conning/manipulative
Facet 2: Affective
Lack of remorse or guilt
Emotionally shallow
Callous/lack of empathy
Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
Facet 3: Lifestyle
Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
Parasitic lifestyle
Lack of realistic, long-term goals
Impulsivity
Irresponsibility
Facet 4: Antisocial
Poor behavioral controls
Early behavioral problems
Juvenile delinquency
Revocation of conditional release
Criminal versatility
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopath ... _Checklist
Some of the Affective (Facet 2) traits are actually
useful for people have to make tough decisions on a daily basis (like CEO's and surgeons)... And you don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure out why Facet 1 traits might be useful for a lawyer. Psychopaths are also more likely to be risk-takers, which is an attractive (and necessary) trait in may business situations.
The problem with psychopaths becomes obvious when you look at all traits combined, however. These people tend to be... troublemakers.