Page 2 of 3 [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

13 Dec 2013, 10:41 am

Misslizard wrote:
As long as the Matriarchy does not get out of control,like on the movie The Wicker Man.Every man that's ever watched it,hates it :D I rather liked it,but they go a little to far in the end.


^Thanks for the recommendation. I've downloaded it, and will watch it eventually, and will report back on how much I hated it.

According to Schneekugel, Feminists "are interested in genders being given the same rights and worth." However, one thing that I'm starting to notice about the strident Feminists:

Whenever the Feminists perceive anything where there is a disadvantage for women compared to men, the strident Feminists will holler "Bloody Murder!" until the Patriarchs do something about it. It doesn't matter how trivial the disadvantage is, nor whether the disadvantage is, in fact real. That's just how it works.

Where women have an advantage over men, for example, as mentioned in the article above, in academic performance and in earnings (for young women vs. men), the Feminists aren't complaining at all, nor suggesting that girls should be held back so that things can be more egalitarian. Nor are the Feminists rubbing it in our faces, and taunting us at all ("Ha! Ha! Girls are better than Boys!"). They are just keeping quiet about it. Instead, the strident Feminists keep citing their own facts that women earn less than men, to be sure to keep us in the dark, and to be sure that the Patriarchs continue to turn advantages over to the women.

Feminists also aren't complaining about the fact that women have a longer life expectancy than men. Imagine the ruckus if the situation were reversed. In the name of egalitarianism, we'd be euthanized once we reached women's average life expectancy. Women have the advantage, and the Feminists are keeping quiet.

And, I think that the Feminists are very smart to remain silent about their advantages, and to resist the temptation to rub it in our faces.

This way, the Feminists can move stealthily towards world domination, until we are living exactly like the Masuo, and we won't know what hit us.

Women are much smarter than men, but I see what is going on here. :wink:

I think that it would be much more expedient for the Patriarchs to admit defeat right now, and to turn the world completely over to the Feminists. That way, the men could relax and enjoy some sex. Who needs all of this stress, anyway?



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

13 Dec 2013, 11:18 am

What have they invented lately?



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

13 Dec 2013, 12:25 pm

ruveyn wrote:
What have they invented lately?


The Feminists? You're going to get beaten up, Ruveyn.

Image



WorldsEdge
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Age: 60
Gender: Male
Posts: 458
Location: Massachusetts

13 Dec 2013, 12:38 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Feminists also aren't complaining about the fact that women have a longer life expectancy than men. Imagine the ruckus if the situation were reversed. In the name of egalitarianism, we'd be euthanized once we reached women's average life expectancy. Women have the advantage, and the Feminists are keeping quiet.


Since white women live on average around ten years longer than African-American men, I've sometimes wondered if this doesn't make something like the Social Security system in the US racist, de facto if not exactly de jure. Especially now that you don't become eligible to collect full benefits until age 67 for those born after 1960. African-American men will only get about three years or so on average, and white women will get to collect for three or four times that.

Both groups paid into the system their whole working lives, but one group winds up funding the retirement of the other. :?


_________________
"The man who has fed the chicken every day throughout its life at last wrings its neck instead, showing that more refined views as to the uniformity of nature would have been useful to the chicken." ? Bertrand Russell


Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

13 Dec 2013, 1:02 pm

There is also an older version of The Wicker Man filmed in 1973.Theone with Nicolas Cage was filmed in 2006.
And no choclate chip cookies for ruveyn,those were invented by a woman. :D Hand over the circular saw,the Kevlar vest and the flares also.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

13 Dec 2013, 3:30 pm

WorldsEdge wrote:
Since white women live on average around ten years longer than African-American men, I've sometimes wondered if this doesn't make something like the Social Security system in the US racist, de facto if not exactly de jure. Especially now that you don't become eligible to collect full benefits until age 67 for those born after 1960. African-American men will only get about three years or so on average, and white women will get to collect for three or four times that.

Both groups paid into the system their whole working lives, but one group winds up funding the retirement of the other. :?


That is an excellent point that I had not previously considered.

White women are doing better with Social Security than any other group. Not only because they live longer than everyone else, but because of the rather generous survivors' benefits. At least until fairly recently, their White husbands tended to earn more than everyone else. Hence, their Social Security retirement checks were higher than everyone else's. And, the full amount is transferred to a surviving spouse upon the recipient's death.

I don't anticipate the Feminists to be complaining about this arrangement any time soon.



Misslizard
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Age: 60
Gender: Female
Posts: 20,481
Location: Aux Arcs

13 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm

I find the arrangement quite satisfying as I intend to live a long time.Women also live longer when they are not burdened with the constant care of a man. :D but it is considered healthy to have a male visitor on special occasions.


_________________
I am the dust that dances in the light. - Rumi


Jono
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,652
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa

13 Dec 2013, 3:54 pm

The Mosuo society is not fully matriarchal but more matrilineal. Men still hold political power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosuo_people

http://www.mosuoproject.org/mosuo.htm



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

13 Dec 2013, 10:39 pm

WorldsEdge wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Feminists also aren't complaining about the fact that women have a longer life expectancy than men. Imagine the ruckus if the situation were reversed. In the name of egalitarianism, we'd be euthanized once we reached women's average life expectancy. Women have the advantage, and the Feminists are keeping quiet.


Since white women live on average around ten years longer than African-American men, I've sometimes wondered if this doesn't make something like the Social Security system in the US racist, de facto if not exactly de jure. Especially now that you don't become eligible to collect full benefits until age 67 for those born after 1960. African-American men will only get about three years or so on average, and white women will get to collect for three or four times that.

Both groups paid into the system their whole working lives, but one group winds up funding the retirement of the other. :?


It's not just white women vs. black men; it's anyone who works hard, physical labor (or dangerous labor) vs. anyone who has a desk job. If you're literally wearing your body out at work (and/or risking you life doing it), you should get to retire a little earlier than someone whose most dangerous and stressful part of life is the daily commute. You shouldn't be so worn out by the time that you retire that you don't get to enjoy yourself a little before you die.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2013, 9:00 am

LKL wrote:
It's not just white women vs. black men; it's anyone who works hard, physical labor (or dangerous labor) vs. anyone who has a desk job. If you're literally wearing your body out at work (and/or risking you life doing it), you should get to retire a little earlier than someone whose most dangerous and stressful part of life is the daily commute. You shouldn't be so worn out by the time that you retire that you don't get to enjoy yourself a little before you die.


The longer the retirement age is extended, the more people will be going out on SSDI (social security disability).

Actually, people who have a high school education (or less), and who have been doing physical labor all their lives, find it the easiest to qualify for SSDI. If you can't climb roofs any more (due to a medical condition), and you don't have the smarts for a desk job, then you're set for life.

This is one area where White women don't have a particular advantage. :wink:



LKL
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Age: 48
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,402

14 Dec 2013, 8:45 pm

But you shouldn't have to wait until you're crippled to retire. My grandparents got to do the traveling that they always wanted to do, after retirement, because their bodies were still up to it. I'm really glad that they got to do so, and I think that others should have that ability too.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

14 Dec 2013, 8:49 pm

LKL wrote:
But you shouldn't have to wait until you're crippled to retire. My grandparents got to do the traveling that they always wanted to do, after retirement, because their bodies were still up to it. I'm really glad that they got to do so, and I think that others should have that ability too.


I agree 1000%. The USA is just a crazy nation.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,800
Location: Stendec

14 Dec 2013, 8:54 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
... The USA is just a crazy nation.

Blame the Europeans. Before they came, the women did all of the cooking, cleaning, and carrying of firewood and other supplies. The men hunted, fished, fought each other, and fathered children. Then the Europeans showed up and thought they could improve on this with their guns, Bible, and democracy.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

15 Dec 2013, 8:16 am

Many of the tribes were matriarchal.

http://www.pbs.org/indiancountry/challe ... lies2.html

I remember visiting an Acoma village in New Mexico

Image

which had once been used in a John Wayne movie. The tour guide explained how their matriarchal system worked. Unfortunately, the guys don't get an all-you-can-eat buffet of sex (possibly due to the Spanish Catholic influence--I don't know. He didn't really talk about it). But, the women own and inherit the houses, and the men are what we would call second-class citizens.

The Spaniards really did some horrible things to these people. Even beyond forcibly converting them to Catholicism.



sephardic-male
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 274
Location: Toronto, Canada

15 Dec 2013, 10:43 am

an example of female supremacy is women getting lighter sentences than men




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss5TkE-81YQ[/youtube]


_________________
http://theothermccain.com/category/feminism/sex-trouble/

Robert Stacy McCain's sex trouble series


Ganondox
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Oct 2011
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,777
Location: USA

16 Dec 2013, 4:26 am

sephardic-male wrote:
an example of female supremacy is women getting lighter sentences than men




[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ss5TkE-81YQ[/youtube]


Actually woman getting lighter sentences is because of MALE SUPREMACY. The men in charge think of woman as delicate little things and get boners and crap for the women, so they give them lighter sentences.


_________________
Cinnamon and sugary
Softly Spoken lies
You never know just how you look
Through other people's eyes

Autism FAQs http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt186115.html