Is there "good" without God?
I don't have any problems with your suggestion. I simply don't credit it with any validity or value. The world is full of messengers for various gods and belief systems. Yours is just one of the many and of no more validity than anyone else's absolute authority.
And does does that mean you accept Muslims external final moral authority that it is good to proselytise the unbelievers or to kill those who refuse to be converted?
Emotional tantrums? Where did you get that from? You speak of absolute truth but in reality all you offer is dogma. No religion is 100% true - all are false. The notion that upsets Christians is that their entire belief system is founded upon make belief. It is mythology and legend rolled into fantasy. No serious minded secularists or atheists are going to accept such mumbo jumbo as a basis for morality.
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3MLJUOW9NE[/youtube]
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
If there is no god, what is good? Then there could be multiple, conflicting definitions of good. No one has any authority for saying what is right and wrong, only what helps humanity and promotes happiness and what hurts it. Most people accept hurting humanity as "bad" and helping it as "good", but there is nothing that says it has to be that way.
the language of moral realism arises out of a desire to treat moral intentions as existing independent of any particular human minds. this is typically accomplished by locating them in the mind of god, where they are allegedly unaffected by human desire. abandoning an absolute basis for morality, one may continue using moral realist language metaphorically, understanding the "moral ground" to be a provisional intersubjective ground, an abstraction supported exclusively by human desire and consensus. in that case, there can still be "good" in the sense of what we agree to want for one another. however, retaining language rooted in the assumption of an actual moral ground tends to leave a moral ground shaped hole in one's head, which may lead to silly questions.
Last edited by wornlight on 22 Jan 2014, 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If there is no god, what is good? Then there could be multiple, conflicting definitions of good. No one has any authority for saying what is right and wrong, only what helps humanity and promotes happiness and what hurts it. Most people accept hurting humanity as "bad" and helping it as "good", but there is nothing that says it has to be that way.
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Last edited by AspieOtaku on 22 Jan 2014, 4:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Christianity is based on the belief that the Bible relates actual events.
Belief proves nothing.
The fact that the first written account of the life of Jesus (the Gospel According to Mark) was written in Greek (not Aramaic), about 25 to 35 years after his death, obviates another fact -- that the Gospels were not written as on-the-scene eyewitness reports, but were instead written from the collective memories of people who allegedly witnessed the related events.
30 years can distort anyone's memory; and the Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John later embellished on an already-distorted account of what may (or may not) have been actual events. If one reads the Gospels in their chronologic order (Mark, Matthew, Luke and then John), one notes an increasingly supernatural aspect to what was originally a rather mundane account of one man's ministry.
Note that the chapters on the "Virgin Birth" appear only in Matthew and Luke, which were written sometime between 60 and 100 C.E., and that both Mark and John omit the "Virgin Birth" story entirely.
Yes, that is morality in a nutshell without all the bullcrap and divine mumbo jumbo wrapped around it. Treat others as you want to be treated. Most of us learn during infancy that it is wrong to hurt others or to steal because we don't like it when others steal from us or hurt us. Why make morality more complicated than it needs to be?
_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.
Profit.
If I can preach a sermon that makes you feel guilty enough to give me money as a form of atonement, then I could theoretically become wealthy by doing the same to dozens -- or hundreds -- of people at once.
Then I could offer psychological counseling (at $200 per session) to remove that guilt, and send you back to church!
Yes ... greed is good ...
Nol one has ever heard the Real God. The God of the priests, the preachers, the rabbis, the immams, the prophets and the various religious fanatics is a fevered product of their own imaginations. The Real God does not communicate with us nor are we capable of communicating with the Real God. It is where It is and we are where we are.
ruveyn
Nol one has ever heard the Real God. The God of the priests, the preachers, the rabbis, the immams, the prophets and the various religious fanatics is a fevered product of their own imaginations. The Real God does not communicate with us nor are we capable of communicating with the Real God. It is where It is and we are where we are.
ruveyn
Then how is it relevant to us?
Even if God exists, Good is best known for it rarity among humans.
ruveyn
_________________
Your Aspie score is 193 of 200
Your neurotypical score is 40 of 200
You are very likely an aspie
No matter where I go I will always be a Gaijin even at home. Like Anime? https://kissanime.to/AnimeList
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
not good enough |
03 Oct 2024, 5:58 pm |
Are you a good friend |
23 Oct 2024, 9:07 am |
Some good news... |
24 Nov 2024, 8:32 pm |
Any Good Totally Free Dating Sites? |
24 Nov 2024, 8:33 pm |