18 Apr 2014, 11:16 am
18 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,528
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi
18 Apr 2014, 11:33 am
18 Apr 2014, 11:50 am
techstepgenr8tion wrote:
pawelk1986 wrote:
Why? Can you explain?
Being anti-communist doesn't bode well for a Nobel Peace Prize.
It's almost like imagining a famous wiccan winning a prestegious award from a bible college.
Now I understand.
After all, the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which is responsible for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize is controlled by a bunch of commies, That's why Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize
18 Apr 2014, 12:09 pm
18 Apr 2014, 12:13 pm
pawelk1986 wrote:
Is good that he did not allowed for the appointment of women as priests.
Because the priesthood is not for women. While i do support women as World, lawmakers, astronaut etc. But priesthood was traditinaly mans role, Christianity originated from Judaism, and among the Jews, both those living in Jesus' time as well as today, is unlikely to meet a woman rabbi
Because the priesthood is not for women. While i do support women as World, lawmakers, astronaut etc. But priesthood was traditinaly mans role, Christianity originated from Judaism, and among the Jews, both those living in Jesus' time as well as today, is unlikely to meet a woman rabbi
It is so polite when people openly express their sexist beliefs rather than hiding them between smoke screens and "rational tail" arguments. It makes debating so much more... efficient.
I was going to point out that the first female rabbi was ordained in 1935 - almost 80 years ago - but for now I'll just say:
Q.E.D
18 Apr 2014, 12:31 pm
18 Apr 2014, 12:43 pm
18 Apr 2014, 12:46 pm
18 Apr 2014, 12:55 pm
18 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
18 Apr 2014, 1:25 pm
GGPViper wrote:
TheValk wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
TheValk wrote:
How about you let each individual Christian denomination decide whether female ordination is religiously justified instead of blindly following whatever the hottest new trend of liberalism emerges?
Well, I have no problem with that. As long as those denominations stay the f*** out of politics, because then it is blatant gender discrimination.
What untermenschen do you consider them to be that they would be expected to opt out of politics?
Oh, I have no such expectation.
Bigots, apparently, are not known for their modesty... I find it particular illustrating that the Catholic Church - which does not allow female ordainment - has so adamant beliefs on the issues of abortion.
For instance: Wouldn't an organization with a mandated male-only leadership (The Catholic Church) be less competent to form an opinion on a topic which directly involves the female reproductive system compared to an organization with a more inclusive membership?
Why is it that organizations with the most limited female representation are the ones most vocal about what women should and should not do?
Because the murder of the unborn is a sin and women who have abortions just for your convenience, "Lets do some sex for fun, and eventually i can always get abortion on demand, i call such woman selfish b*****s. People undertaking the sexual act should take into account the possible consequences of their actions
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia
Last edited by pawelk1986 on 18 Apr 2014, 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
18 Apr 2014, 1:33 pm
18 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
18 Apr 2014, 1:54 pm
pawelk1986 wrote:
Because the murder of the unborn is a sin and women who have abortions just for your convenience, "Lets do some sex for fun, and eventually i can always get abortion on demand, i call such woman selfish b*****s. People undertaking the sexual act should take into account the possible consequences of their actions
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia
I find it highly illustrating that a post about the absence in women in organizations against abortion is met by a claim by a man belonging to such an organization who explicitly announces that women who seek elective abortion are "selfish b*****s".
QED.
18 Apr 2014, 2:56 pm
GGPViper wrote:
pawelk1986 wrote:
Because the murder of the unborn is a sin and women who have abortions just for your convenience, "Lets do some sex for fun, and eventually i can always get abortion on demand, i call such woman selfish b*****s. People undertaking the sexual act should take into account the possible consequences of their actions
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia
I find it highly illustrating that a post about the absence in women in organizations against abortion is met by a claim by a man belonging to such an organization who explicitly announces that women who seek elective abortion are "selfish b*****s".
QED.
What I mean is that if someone fathered a child, it should take care of him or her.
I am a supporter of sexual abstinence, both women and men. People who decide to have sex should be responsible , and do not treat sex as innocent fun.
And if a woman have got pregnant, and I am thinking about voluntary with informed consent sexual intercourse, it can always give the kid up for adoption. There are many people who really want to have a child but are infertile.
I have two advice for man jacking off, for woman fingering, it also sin, but is far much better than murder of innocent children
EDIT:
Maybe i'm not should use word "selfish b*****s" for what i'm apologize, I overreacted.
I know that my beliefs may seem a little old-fashioned, but I believe that sex should be decided people aware of all the consequences, not necessarily wait until marriage, but is good solution, but both men and women should know that sex can end up pregnancy, and the child as a being has the right to life. that belongs to every human being regardless of race or religion. For this, if anyone has necessarily to have sex, it is good to buy a condom, even if it is a sin. You see, not all Catholics are against condoms
| Similar Topics | |
|---|---|
| War and Peace? |
Today, 8:46 am |
| Peace of mind |
28 Jan 2025, 6:15 pm |
| Jewish Voice For Peace COVID loan fraud settlement |
15 Jan 2025, 3:39 pm |
| John Thune new Senate Majority leader |
13 Nov 2024, 4:12 pm |
