Page 2 of 34 [ 544 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 34  Next


Would you date a feminist?
Yes 37%  37%  [ 55 ]
No 36%  36%  [ 53 ]
Ima girl 2%  2%  [ 3 ]
Ima girl and still yes 19%  19%  [ 29 ]
I'm a feminist and I am offended by this thread 6%  6%  [ 9 ]
Total votes : 149

kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

28 Feb 2016, 4:51 pm

I've dated feminists--they believed in the "fair is fair"'credo, and that we are human.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

28 Feb 2016, 5:07 pm

Feyokien wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
I think it would probably be tough to be with someone who takes themselves too seriously or would get offended at everything you say, I don't think anyone wants to walk around on eggshells. If someone likes you and you like them back, who you get along with, I'm not looking for a perfect ideological twin.


Wrong definition of feminism, once again taking it out on a very small subset minority, if you can even call them a subset and not a different group of people. Feminists just want to be equal. Nothing in that has anything to do with SJW's. How socially conservative or lack of, has nothing to do with Feminism.


I know that, what I said could go for any -ism. Someone like that, feminist or not, wouldn't be someone I'd be interested in spending much time with.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

28 Feb 2016, 5:15 pm

Feyokien wrote:
Jacoby wrote:
I think it would probably be tough to be with someone who takes themselves too seriously or would get offended at everything you say, I don't think anyone wants to walk around on eggshells. If someone likes you and you like them back, who you get along with, I'm not looking for a perfect ideological twin.


Wrong definition of feminism, once again taking it out on a very small subset minority, if you can even call them a subset and not a different group of people. Feminists just want to be equal. Nothing in that has anything to do with SJW's. How socially conservative or lack of, has nothing to do with Feminism.


Wrong definition or not, I don't really care. Feminists typically want to be equal to men by copying them, and most things that they want to copy disgusts me. I mean, I don't see having as much sex as possible as something I want in a potential partner, and I certainly don't like it when feminists copies the shallowness of NT guys. I don't like it when women behave like men either. I want a partner to be a woman, not a man. I also have no interest in LGBT, which feminists think is so cool.

OTOH, I'm all for women having equal rights as men. I just don't like it when women behave like men.



rdos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jul 2005
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,089
Location: Sweden

28 Feb 2016, 5:22 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
I've dated feminists--they believed in the "fair is fair"'credo, and that we are human.


That we are human is mostly speciesism and I really dislike the idea that we humans are special and much better than other species. It typically also carries over to hate for human diversity, as the notion of human uniqueness typically is based on a very narrow definition of what it means to be human.



TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

28 Feb 2016, 5:32 pm

Hmm, I'd date a girl if I wanted to date them whether they identified as a feminist or not.
i wouldn't however, have a very favourable opinion of them if they do not share a common interest in equality for all people, or are one of those who starts fights in empty rooms.

Note to the guys "white knighting" for feminism in the thread - the comments in the thread have been surprisingly moderate. No need for pointscoring here IMO.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Feb 2016, 5:34 pm

Whatever ism people profess to be in interested in, what they actual believe and crucially how much thought they have put into it is more significant.

It is super easy to identify with a cause, it requires no effort in fact.

There are people who claim to be about freedom, but when you scratch beneath the surface they support views and ideas fundamentally at odd with this.



Last edited by 0_equals_true on 28 Feb 2016, 5:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TheSpectrum
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Jun 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,121
Location: Hampshire

28 Feb 2016, 5:35 pm

0_equals_true wrote:
Whatever ism people profess to be in interested in, what they actual believe and crucially how much thought they have put into it is more significant.

It is super easy to identify with a cause, it requires no effort in fact.

There are people who claim to be about freedom, but when you scratch beneath the surface they support view and ideas fundamentally at odd with this.

Amen.


_________________
Yours sincerely, some dude.


kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

28 Feb 2016, 5:43 pm

You're overdoing it, RDO.

I never said that we humans are superior to other animals.

If we were dogs, I would rather that we emphasize our dogness over our gender/sex.



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Feb 2016, 5:57 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
If we were dogs, I would rather that we emphasize our dogness over our gender/sex.


Gender roles exist in dog packs. African wild dogs are the most interesting

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_wild_dog#Social_structure wrote:
Males and females have separate dominance hierarchies, with the latter usually being led by the oldest female. Males may be led by the oldest male, but these can be supplanted by younger specimens, thus some packs may contain elderly former male pack leaders. The dominant pair typically monopolises breeding.[5] The species differs from most other social species by the fact that males remain in the natal pack, while females disperse (a pattern also found in primates like gorillas, chimpanzees and red colobuses). Furthermore, males in any given pack tend to outnumber females 3:1.[6] Dispersing females will join other packs and evict some of the resident females related to the other pack members, thus preventing inbreeding and allowing the evicted specimens to find new packs of their own and breed.[5] Males rarely disperse, and when they do, they are invariably rejected by other packs already containing males.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

28 Feb 2016, 6:14 pm

Gender roles are universal throughout the Animal Kingdom



0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

28 Feb 2016, 6:22 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Gender roles are universal throughout the Animal Kingdom


That sentence is ambiguous in meaning. Not sure what you are trying to say.

Gender roles vary greatly in the animal kingdom, there are varying degrees of hierarchy and structure.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

28 Feb 2016, 7:17 pm

I meant that the existence of gender roles, no matter their character, are universal.



Idealist
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2015
Age: 36
Posts: 443
Location: Edinburgh

28 Feb 2016, 7:44 pm

darkphantomx1 wrote:
Would you date a feminist?

I have dated both male and female Feminists.


_________________
Hope is the first step on the road to disappointment, but the last step on the path to salvation.

Idealist wrote:
My Autism was cured/treated in late childhood (this makes me a walking, talking, contradiction to 90% of the Forum who all believe Autism is incurable)


nick007
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 May 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 27,593
Location: was Louisiana but now Vermont in capitalistic police state called USA

29 Feb 2016, 2:05 am

My 2nd girlfriend was a feminist & she thought I was kind of a feminist too & I think I kind of am despite being called a misogynist in L&D in the past.


_________________
"I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem!"
~King Of The Hill


"Hear all, trust nothing"
~Ferengi Rule Of Acquisition #190
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Ru ... cquisition


AR15000
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

Joined: 19 Jan 2016
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 429
Location: Right behind you

29 Feb 2016, 2:45 am

Absolutely!


BUT.........she would need to be a true egalitarian feminist who seems feminism as a ethic, not as a group identity or as a social climbing strategy. As long as she is not righteous, entitled, lacking self-criticism, and so engrossed in her ideology that she treats it as a religion and cannot question her own beliefs nor accept criticism of feminism. And most of all, it has to be a woman who judges people more on what they DO than what they say.



Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

29 Feb 2016, 3:08 am

I was married to one for a while, it was fine politically speaking. I'd really date someone of any ideology that wasn't stupid about it.


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez