Page 2 of 2 [ 28 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Jan 2017, 6:56 pm

leejosepho wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Every soldier who is in the US military swears an oath to protect, defend and uphold the US Constitution, not the US Government.

Understood, and then at least some of those same soldiers are trained for urban warfare with full knowledge of the possibility of having to raise arms against fellow citizens. I do not have any kind of axe to grind and I do not mean to stir trouble or controversy, yet the fact does remain that we citizens could never even come close to being successful if ever trying to do what the second amendment is all about.

What citizens of a mind can do is wreak havoc for a standing army and its government by guerrilla warfare (e.g. ambushes, booby traps and IED's, sniping, sabotage, etc.).

leejosepho wrote:
sly279 wrote:
leejosepho wrote:
Fogman wrote:
Every soldier who is in the US military swears an oath to protect, defend and uphold the US Constitution, not the US Government.

Understood, and then at least some of those same soldiers are trained for urban warfare with full knowledge of the possibility of having to raise arms against fellow citizens.

In order to stop a citizen uprising the government would have to wipe whole cities off the map...

Use of the second amendment to quash a tyrannical government was an excellent, theoretical idea when the constitution was first written, but the civil war has since proved it is not plausible. So, naturalplastic might have the better ideas here...

The civil war was fought with the wrong tactics.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

04 Jan 2017, 7:00 pm

leejosepho wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You don't understand that a militia trying to overthrow a government don't have to fight like a military...

Then the second amendment should never have even been mentioned in this thread. But either way, what I do or do not understand is completely off-topic.


It was a pointless and frivolous thread to begin with so derailing it can only help.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


sly279
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,181
Location: US

04 Jan 2017, 8:29 pm

leejosepho wrote:
sly279 wrote:
You don't understand that a militia trying to overthrow a government don't have to fight like a military...

Then the second amendment should never have even been mentioned in this thread. But either way, what I do or do not understand is completely off-topic.

I didn't bring up the topic of weather a civil war could happen, I only engaged it.



Fogman
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2005
Age: 57
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,986
Location: Frå Nord Dakota til Vermont

04 Jan 2017, 8:42 pm

Raptor wrote:
What citizens of a mind can do is wreak havoc for a standing army and its government by guerrilla warfare (e.g. ambushes, booby traps and IED's, sniping, sabotage, etc.).


Yup. It's how we fought the English in the 18th century, it's how the Vietnamese fought against us, and how the Afghani's fought both Russia and us. It's also how Iraqi's fought us. We got the territory, but not the minds of the people.


_________________
When There's No There to get to, I'm so There!


leejosepho
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,011
Location: 200 miles south of Little Rock

05 Jan 2017, 7:04 am

Raptor wrote:
It was a pointless and frivolous thread to begin with so derailing it can only help.

Well, that makes me feel a bit better! Mostly, however, I have been wanting to avoid any kind of discussion that could sound like anyone here is planning to attempt any oust of any kind.

sly279 wrote:
I didn't bring up the topic...

Understood.

Raptor wrote:
What citizens of a mind can do is wreak havoc for a standing army and its government by guerrilla warfare (e.g. ambushes, booby traps and IED's, sniping, sabotage, etc.).

There is where I first saw impossibility: "a standing army and its government" = "a government and its standing army". That "standing army" is already trained to deal with guerrilla warfare in cities and 'burbs, and no second-amendment militia could ever cry "Defend the Constitution!" loudly enough to convince it to turn around and begin shooting in the other direction.


_________________
I began looking for someone like me when I was five ...
My search ended at 59 ... right here on WrongPlanet.
==================================


friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

05 Jan 2017, 5:39 pm

beneficii wrote:
Like, how did we get to this screwed up confluence of policies? Simply put, Americans don't know how to govern and require the protection of more enlightened powers.

Which ones, and how have they shown their superior ability.



Magneto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,086
Location: Blighty

06 Jan 2017, 11:10 am

I know! America could model itself on Switzerland, with autonomous sub-national governments, a heavily armed population, and an isolationist foreign policy!



friedmacguffins
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,539

06 Jan 2017, 11:37 am

Magneto wrote:
I know! America could model itself on Switzerland, with autonomous sub-national governments, a heavily armed population, and an isolationist foreign policy!


(The opposite of a protectorate.)

I like.

Have you ever noticed they are the people, who you were supposed to trust with your money, and who made good things, and were energy independent, and could clean up after themselves...



beneficii
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 10 May 2005
Age: 40
Gender: Female
Posts: 7,245

11 Jan 2017, 6:44 am

Magneto wrote:
I know! America could model itself on Switzerland, with autonomous sub-national governments, a heavily armed population, and an isolationist foreign policy!


I can dig it.


_________________
"You have a responsibility to consider all sides of a problem and a responsibility to make a judgment and a responsibility to care for all involved." --Ian Danskin


Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

11 Jan 2017, 6:53 am

I like Switzerland :)



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

11 Jan 2017, 6:56 am

Belgium is kinda run that way too.

The northern Flemish speaking part has its own domestic government, and the southern French speaking part, its own as well. And there is a central government that does foreign policy, and defense, for both.

So we could subdivide the US into regions like that (this group of blue states here, and that group of red states there), and do it like Belgium (or Switzerland).



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

11 Jan 2017, 7:28 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Belgium is kinda run that way too.

The northern Flemish speaking part has its own domestic government, and the southern French speaking part, its own as well. And there is a central government that does foreign policy, and defense, for both.

So we could subdivide the US into regions like that (this group of blue states here, and that group of red states there), and do it like Belgium (or Switzerland).


I don't think anybody looks at Belgium as a model to run a country however, they are pretty dysfunctional and may eventually end up splitting.

Switzerland is interesting because of it's direct democracy and militia system, they weren't even apart of the UN until not too long ago but it seems like Swiss isolationism isn't what it was in the past.