Creationists: This is your chance to prove yourselves.

Page 2 of 5 [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

05 Jan 2018, 10:12 pm

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
The creationists who piss me off are the ones who say I can't be a real Christian because I know evolution is a fact.


"It not infrequently happens that something about the earth, about the sky, about other elements of this world, about the motion and rotation or even the magnitude and distances of the stars, about definite eclipses of the sun and moon, about the passage of years and seasons, about the nature of animals, of fruits, of stones, and of other such things, may be known with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience, even by one who is not a Christian.
It is too disgraceful and ruinous, though, and greatly to be avoided, that he [the non-Christian] should hear a Christian speaking so idiotically on these matters, and as if in accord with Christian writings, that he might say that he could scarcely keep from laughing when he saw how totally in error they are.
In view of this and in keeping it in mind constantly while dealing with the book of Genesis, I have, insofar as I was able, explained in detail and set forth for consideration the meanings of obscure passages, taking care not to affirm rashly some one meaning to the prejudice of another and perhaps better explanation."
- Augustine of Hippo


Ah, Augustine was a favorite of Luther's.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

06 Jan 2018, 12:12 am

Let's be honest. If I went through all the problems with creationism, we'd be here all day.

For example, most creationists believe that all prehistoric creatures lived on earth together at the some time. That's a rather extreme and unrealistic level of biodiversity.

I mean, I'd love to watch a tyrannosaur fight a mammoth, but that's what comic books are for.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


Chronos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Age: 45
Gender: Female
Posts: 8,698

06 Jan 2018, 12:43 am

The problem with these creation vs. evolution debates is, when creationist are also adherents to scientific theory, is the conversation inevitably branches out into fields that the individuals on either side are really qualified to discuss in any depth, and few people would be, even in academia.

Even when academics really discuss these things, they often have to review and study before hand.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,529
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

06 Jan 2018, 1:25 am

I don't know if it's just me but I have a hard time distinguishing, qualitatively, between 6,000 year old earth and flat earth - ie. which is more roundly debunked or absurd. I think it's one thing for a person to make an archetypal argument for Christianity, a completely different thing for them to build the natural world from the bible outward.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

06 Jan 2018, 1:49 am

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Let's be honest. If I went through all the problems with creationism, we'd be here all day.

For example, most creationists believe that all prehistoric creatures lived on earth together at the some time. That's a rather extreme and unrealistic level of biodiversity.

I mean, I'd love to watch a tyrannosaur fight a mammoth, but that's what comic books are for.


If modern cows and border collies coexisted with tyrannosaurus Rex, then cows and border collies would have ceased to exist in fifteen minutes.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,529
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

06 Jan 2018, 1:50 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
If modern cows and border collies coexisted with tyrannosaurus Rex, then cows and border collies would have ceased to exist in fifteen minutes.

Or they'd all be the color of dinosaur guano.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

06 Jan 2018, 1:59 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Let's be honest. If I went through all the problems with creationism, we'd be here all day.

For example, most creationists believe that all prehistoric creatures lived on earth together at the some time. That's a rather extreme and unrealistic level of biodiversity.

I mean, I'd love to watch a tyrannosaur fight a mammoth, but that's what comic books are for.


If modern cows and border collies coexisted with tyrannosaurus Rex, then cows and border collies would have ceased to exist in fifteen minutes.


I disagree.

Large dinosaurs managed to coexist with smaller dinosaurs.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

06 Jan 2018, 2:02 am

DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Let's be honest. If I went through all the problems with creationism, we'd be here all day.

For example, most creationists believe that all prehistoric creatures lived on earth together at the some time. That's a rather extreme and unrealistic level of biodiversity.

I mean, I'd love to watch a tyrannosaur fight a mammoth, but that's what comic books are for.


If modern cows and border collies coexisted with tyrannosaurus Rex, then cows and border collies would have ceased to exist in fifteen minutes.


I disagree.


Large dinosaurs managed to coexist with smaller dinosaurs.


Perhaps. Still, there is zero fossil evidence that modern animals coexisted with dinosaurs.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 Jan 2018, 7:51 am

Here is the "real" Earth. The white cake frost around the edge is the continent of Antarctica.

Image

Sweetleaf wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
But the Earth isn't flat. If it was, we would be reading about people falling off it, and floating in space.


They think there is a worldwide organization that guards the edge of the earth to prevent people reaching the edge, or something to that effect. Or at least that is what I read somewhere.


Yes. That's the belief among modern flat earthers.


Modern Flatearthlers conceive the earth as looking like the seal of the United Nations projected upon a pizza. The North Pole is a point at the center of the flat round disk of the Earth, and the south pole is, not a point, but the 25000 mile circumference of the planet. The continent of Antarctica is like the crust of the pizza. Not the blob of land that you see on the bottom of globes, but a wall of land that hems the whole planet (and keeps the ocean from flowing off the edge).

And of course of there is a force of goons guarding Antarctica so you cant go exploring the place and actually go there and look over the edge of the earth! :lol:

Who hires all of those goons (must be a BIG force to guard the whole 25000 mile perimeter of the earth) I do not know. NASA, the Vatican, the UN, or maybe its the globe manufacturers.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

06 Jan 2018, 11:07 am

Why do you think mammals had to be small and sprite during the Mesozoic?

The dinosaurs, that's why!



DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

06 Jan 2018, 2:35 pm

Yo El wrote:
I don't know how answering these questions prove anything. You are being overly generous to creatonists OP.


Being "overly generous" requires a great deal of maturity and emotional control, but it usually pays off.

If you are emotionally stable enough to claim and maintain the moral high ground, you might as well do so.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

06 Jan 2018, 4:14 pm

Well....

No one has taken up your invitation.



Scorpius14
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 7 Sep 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 543
Location: wrong universe

06 Jan 2018, 4:54 pm

I mention something to a particularly religious person i live with: "look you can see Saturn in the night sky", he responds "thats one of God's creations", and that just kills the conversation for me so I just walk out.



Tross
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 867

07 Jan 2018, 3:47 am

Those of us with reasonably strong faith feel no need to prove anything, because faith is not about proof. If we had proof, it wouldn't be faith. It does seem like there are a lot of misconceptions about Christians, and the religious in general, that are floating around. The "creationists" this topic is clearly leveled at are what are known in my circle as "New Earth Christians", meaning they believe Earth is only roughly 6000 years old. I am what is known as an "Old Earth Christian" in that I don't believe in the dichotomy between the Bible and Science that many people on both sides believe in. And yes, there is a divide between Old and New Earth Christians, though it's not nearly as pronounced as the divide between sects like the Catholics and Protestants.

Anyways, I believe in evolution too, and that God created the universe. Fun fact, I found out only a few years ago that the original Hebrew word for "day" in whatever old dialect is used in the bible, is the same word used for "era". It sounds way more lit to say "God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh" than if you replace the word "days" with the word "eras", so it makes sense that the first chapter of Genesis in the English bible would read that way. Besides, even if you use the word days, God didn't create the sun until the fourth. If a day is defined as a rotation of the Earth as it revolves around the sun, then those first few days aren't necessarily days. It's also worth noting that animals came first, then humans.

But, I feel no need to justify my faith. Maybe someone who specializes in apologetics could post a reply, but that really isn't my cup of tea at all. God has proven himself to me many times, but all I have is qualitative data of personal accounts. I also don't believe "does God exist?" is the right question to ask anyways. Maybe try "would my life improve if I let God in?"

Besides, I believe it's the onus of those actively trying to disprove God's existence to prove their point beyond a reasonable doubt using empirical evidence as they're the ones forcing their ideas on others. Anything that proves God is improbable is simply inadequate. I believe in an improbable God. For the record, I also believe in Stephen Hawking's theory that the universe was created by two tiny, microscopic, specks colliding, and the particles from that collision expanding outward. That actually sounds just like how God would work. It's also believed that those specks no longer exist and there is no way to determine where they came from or how they came to collide with one another. Does anyone here know something the top scientists in the world don't?

Note, I'm not really challenging anyone. I can't prove God's existence any more than anyone can disprove it (although if you truly have uncovered the mystery of the universe, a lot of people would like to hear from you, myself included). All I've proven is that both theists and atheists are at an impasse. I prefer to practice my faith in peace, alongside those who also practice it, and I would prefer if those who have different beliefs would stop trying to force them on those of us of faith. I've also established that I'm very much in both the "creationist" and "evolutionist" camps. If you want a serious debate, find someone else to have it with.



techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,529
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

07 Jan 2018, 10:55 am

What's crazy-making is that the circumstantial evidence, not yet scientific per se, does point to something one could theoretically call God (although it would clearly fail Epicurus's four-fold exam), just that... well... the earth also looks like this and we're strapped into something where it's a constant cold war, within species as well, that has genocidal ends. It's incredibly difficult to figure out what one grabs onto for hope when every study of the physical yields chaos and total war of all against all as the state of creation.

Naive materialists IMHO actually have a teddy-bear of sorts to hug and it's the belief that no self-aware being is overseeing this or that as apes we simply cease to exist after this. Add that your immortal and that there is such a being and all of this actually gets a lot more painful. While I give devout Christians credit for trying to find a system that will psychologically keep them alive in good shape through this madness I think it is in a place where the fundamental moral concerns probably do need to map on to the current state - even less over certain moral issues becoming less relevant but more over certain moral issues not found in the bible being of ten commandments level importance right now. If anything the success of Christianity is that it its moral tenets were successful hedges *against* the mechanics of creation, forces which also really do their best to give to the strong, murder the weak, and enslave most of those between.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,660
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

07 Jan 2018, 1:54 pm

Tross wrote:
Those of us with reasonably strong faith feel no need to prove anything, because faith is not about proof. If we had proof, it wouldn't be faith. It does seem like there are a lot of misconceptions about Christians, and the religious in general, that are floating around. The "creationists" this topic is clearly leveled at are what are known in my circle as "New Earth Christians", meaning they believe Earth is only roughly 6000 years old. I am what is known as an "Old Earth Christian" in that I don't believe in the dichotomy between the Bible and Science that many people on both sides believe in. And yes, there is a divide between Old and New Earth Christians, though it's not nearly as pronounced as the divide between sects like the Catholics and Protestants.

Anyways, I believe in evolution too, and that God created the universe. Fun fact, I found out only a few years ago that the original Hebrew word for "day" in whatever old dialect is used in the bible, is the same word used for "era". It sounds way more lit to say "God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh" than if you replace the word "days" with the word "eras", so it makes sense that the first chapter of Genesis in the English bible would read that way. Besides, even if you use the word days, God didn't create the sun until the fourth. If a day is defined as a rotation of the Earth as it revolves around the sun, then those first few days aren't necessarily days. It's also worth noting that animals came first, then humans.

But, I feel no need to justify my faith. Maybe someone who specializes in apologetics could post a reply, but that really isn't my cup of tea at all. God has proven himself to me many times, but all I have is qualitative data of personal accounts. I also don't believe "does God exist?" is the right question to ask anyways. Maybe try "would my life improve if I let God in?"

Besides, I believe it's the onus of those actively trying to disprove God's existence to prove their point beyond a reasonable doubt using empirical evidence as they're the ones forcing their ideas on others. Anything that proves God is improbable is simply inadequate. I believe in an improbable God. For the record, I also believe in Stephen Hawking's theory that the universe was created by two tiny, microscopic, specks colliding, and the particles from that collision expanding outward. That actually sounds just like how God would work. It's also believed that those specks no longer exist and there is no way to determine where they came from or how they came to collide with one another. Does anyone here know something the top scientists in the world don't?

Note, I'm not really challenging anyone. I can't prove God's existence any more than anyone can disprove it (although if you truly have uncovered the mystery of the universe, a lot of people would like to hear from you, myself included). All I've proven is that both theists and atheists are at an impasse. I prefer to practice my faith in peace, alongside those who also practice it, and I would prefer if those who have different beliefs would stop trying to force them on those of us of faith. I've also established that I'm very much in both the "creationist" and "evolutionist" camps. If you want a serious debate, find someone else to have it with.


Very much what I believe.


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer