Page 2 of 2 [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,603
Location: Long Island, New York

11 Jan 2018, 1:23 am

How Oprah Helped Spread Anti-Vaccine Pseudoscience That’s one thing she has in common with Donald Trump.

Quote:
Winfrey’s role in this controversy dates back to 2007, when she brought Jenny McCarthy, the Playboy model and actress, onto her show to talk about autism. McCarthy’s young son, Evan, had suffered a series of seizures at two-and-a-half years old and was later diagnosed with autism. McCarthy was adamant that the MMR vaccination Evan received as a baby caused his autism. On the show, McCarthy told Oprah she had been instinctually uncomfortable with allowing the doctor to give her son the vaccine. “I said to the doctor, I have a very bad feeling about this shot,” McCarthy recounted. “This is the autism shot, isn’t it?”

On the show, McCarthy’s claims went largely unchallenged. Winfrey praised McCarthy as a “mother warrior” and plugged her book Louder Than Words: A Mother’s Journey in Healing Autism, which inaccurately suggests childhood vaccinations contribute to autism. Winfrey did read a brief statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which said there was no scientific evidence of a connection and that scientists were continuing to study the causes of autism. “It is important to remember, vaccines protect and save lives. Vaccines protect infants, children and adults from the unnecessary harm and premature death caused by vaccine-preventable diseases,” the CDC statement concluded. But McCarthy had the final word. “My science is named Evan, and he’s at home,” she said. “That’s my science.”

CNN’s Larry King and People magazine also gave attention to McCarthy and her views. She became a semi-regular guest on Winfrey’s show and signed a deal with Winfrey’s Harpo Studios to create her own show, though that show ultimately fell through.McCarthy says she is not anti-vaccine but, rather, an advocate for “safe vaccines.” There’s no evidence that vaccines are currently unsafe.

This wasn’t the first time Winfrey’s audience had been presented with the vaccines-autism theory. A few months before McCarthy’s appearance, Katie Wright, whose son has autism, said on the show, “The vaccine connection has not been refuted at all. In fact, we give 37 vaccines to babies under the age of 18 months. Nobody has shown that that’s safe, a wise idea, the multiple vaccines at once.”

“She wanted to say it, and I wanted you to get it out there,” Winfrey replied, as the audience clapped. “Because you are a mother dealing with your child every day.”

The following year, Christiane Northrup, a physician and one of Winfrey’s regular experts, answered a fan’s question about the human papillomavirus vaccine, which protects against a sexually transmitted virus that can cause cervical cancer. Northrup expressed apprehension about the shot, saying she is “very concerned” about vaccinating young girls and would rather focus on a “getting everybody on a dietary program that would enhance their immunity,” according to a write-up on Winfrey’s website.

Winfrey’s own views on vaccinations aren’t clear. The Oprah Winfrey Network press office didn’t respond to requests for comment. An article published last year on her website did encourage readers to get booster shots recommended by the CDC, including the MMR vaccine. “You may think you’ve had all the immunizations you’ll ever require,” the article said, “but the guidelines are constantly being fine-tuned—for the good of us all.”


Bolding Mine

Katie Wright is the daughter of Bob Wright and the late Suzanne Wright founders of Autism Speaks. Katie’s views on vaccines caused a family rift 11 years ago.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Kraichgauer
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,667
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.

11 Jan 2018, 1:57 am

While I consider Oprah to be infinitely more intelligent than Trump, I still wouldn't want her in the White House as she has zero political experience. Sure, people had voted for that orange moron just for that same lack of government experience, but just look how swimmingly well that's working out!


_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

11 Jan 2018, 2:26 am

Kraichgauer wrote:
While I consider Oprah to be infinitely more intelligent than Trump, I still wouldn't want her in the White House as she has zero political experience. Sure, people had voted for that orange moron just for that same lack of government experience, but just look how swimmingly well that's working out!


I agree.

America needs a dedicated, experienced politician who will get money out of politics and free the US government from corporate control.

Oprah has dedicated most of her life to television, not politics. TV, not politics, is her area of expertise.

To be honest, I don't think that voting for TV personalities is a good idea. In general, TV people are good at making something look good without actually changing anything. That's TV business in a nutshell.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

12 Jan 2018, 4:54 am

Humanist Report Weighs In


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,603
Location: Long Island, New York

12 Jan 2018, 10:02 am

If she is elected as part of a progressive wave and persues a psudoscience agenda it will get passed with little meaningful resistance. Who would oppose an intersectional President that slayed the evil Trump?


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


DarthMetaKnight
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,105
Location: The Infodome

12 Jan 2018, 10:43 am

ASPartOfMe wrote:
If she is elected as part of a progressive wave and persues a psudoscience agenda it will get passed with little meaningful resistance. Who would oppose an intersectional President that slayed the evil Trump?


I would.

I was critical of Obama's militarism.


_________________
Synthetic carbo-polymers got em through man. They got em through mouse. They got through, and we're gonna get out.
-Roostre

READ THIS -> https://represent.us/


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

12 Jan 2018, 11:08 am

Gonorrhea is an improvement...over having syphilis. The later is the worse of the two diseases. Likewise Oprah would be an improvement over Donald. But theyre both the same sorta disease IMHO.



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 41
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

12 Jan 2018, 11:17 am

naturalplastic wrote:
Gonorrhea is an improvement...over having syphilis. The later is the worse of the two diseases. Likewise Oprah would be an improvement over Donald. But theyre both the same sorta disease IMHO.


:lol:


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Tross
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 867

14 Jan 2018, 2:58 am

A reality TV host with a lot of money but no political experience? Who would want someone like that in charge of their country? *Reflects on the past year.* Oh yeah, Americans, that's who. At least Oprah has charisma and I'm sure she has reasonable cognitive faculties as well so I'd take her over that oaf currently in the Oval Office. If the US was my country I'd probably prefer it if TV stars didn't replace people with an actual background in politics, but apparently Americans disagree. For a country so obsessed with politics you'd think Americans would have some understanding of how government works. Oh well. I'd watch an Oprah vs Trump debate for the lols, because apparently "New America" is more about the ratings than taking politics seriously.



Campin_Cat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2014
Age: 63
Gender: Female
Posts: 25,953
Location: Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.

14 Jan 2018, 2:15 pm

I did NOT read this thread----I just wanted to add my two cents.....

President Oprah?

Good God, I hope not!!

I wrote her a nasty-gram (not literal), back in the day, cuz I got sick and tired of her saying "You white people wouldn't know anything about that...", because almost every single time she said that, she said it in reference to something that referenced SOUTHERNERS, not blacks. I have NO interest in voting for someone so ignorant about such matters.





_________________
White female; age 59; diagnosed Aspie.
I use caps for emphasis----I'm NOT angry or shouting. I use caps like others use italics, underline, or bold.
"What we know is a drop; what we don't know, is an ocean." (Sir Isaac Newton)


techstepgenr8tion
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Feb 2005
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 24,529
Location: 28th Path of Tzaddi

14 Jan 2018, 3:22 pm

I think she'd be something like this - multiply Obama by Trump, she'd be the leftovers of that equation.

We'd have a left-liberal, possibly neoliberal, African American populist in office who probably wouldn't make anything better for African Americans, whether it took four or eight years they'd be disgruntled with the results, and I think the only upside with her is that she might not get us into useless wars quite as much although I'd deeply worry about what would happen if we actually had to go to war and how badly she'd manage it as I think she's too much of a hippy and idealist to handle gut-wrenching decisions in a responsible manner.

That brings me back to another point - hippies generally get to rip on the establishment, the military, and the police as wolves when really they've outsourced the ugly stuff to them, they don't like the ugly stuff (which unfortunately is still pervasive), and so they like to hang it around the necks of the people who do the dirty work for them. We can survive having people like that as social talking-heads but if and when they ever get into office they have one of two choices, either a) break their own hearts and realize the world simply isn't what they want it to be or b) likely get impeached for dereliction of duty on the 'making sausage' aspects of leadership albeit not without creating one, of not several, of their own Cuban Missile crises.


_________________
The loneliest part of life: it's not just that no one is on your cloud, few can even see your cloud.