Well that was a boring troll. Time for a serious comment.
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
Race isn't useful from a biological perspective
This doesn't mean what you think it means DMK. It certainly
doesn't mean:
DarthMetaKnight wrote:
The races are all born with the same biological hardware
I will try to explain using dogs. There are hundreds of breeds of dogs, all of them with different "hardware", different abilities, different looks, different talents, different behavioural patterns. If humans decided to group all these hundreds of breeds into five main categories, roughly based on looks, this is "race". A geneticist notes that there is actually huge genetic variation (hello?)
within these broad categories and notes quite correctly that this is
not useful to him.
You can craft a technically accurate (but misleading) statement saying that
the concept of race is not useful from a biological (or at least a genetic) standpoint.You cannot say there is no meaningful biological difference between human ethnic groups (scientists are very careful not to say this) or proclaim every ethnic group has the same talents and abilities.
You can't even say the races have the same biological hardware. Clumsy as race is from the point of view of a geneticist, somehow humans have created visual racial groupings with significant measurable differences - actually if you do the maths, it would be proof-of-God levels of bizarre if there were no differences on aggregate.
It's a sneaky trap you've fallen into, crafted by mad egalitarian anti-reality propagandists, if you seek truth about the world, be sure to avoid similar ones in future.
_________________
Behold! we are not bound for ever to the circles of the world, and beyond them is more than memory, Farewell!