Crimadella wrote:
Hmm, I'm curious. How is "could be a troll", "are you an incel/MRA?" any different from "Are you an idiot?", or "Are you an as*hole?", Or "Could be an as*hole"...
The first also implies the opposite: "could NOT be a troll". The second is a direct question to gain clarifying information. The third, fourth, and fifth contain profanity and/or pejorative terms.
Crimadella wrote:
I think logic is being twisted here, people screaming 'personal attack' while constantly making personal attacks?
Fallacy of the Leading Question. You include your desired conclusion within the wording of the question itself. This is aside from the fact that the sentence is a non-interrogative statement that ends with a question mark.
Crimadella wrote:
Legitimate questions.
Not that last one.