Is "sluggish schizophrenia" just a Soviet concept?

Page 2 of 3 [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

27 Apr 2020, 11:07 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
Its more: one and two were lumped together (severe autism was considered 'childhood schzophrenia'), except even then they were considered as being quite different things despite the similar label.

And three was the empty set. It just wasn't even recognized as a category.


Thats what I used to think. But kraftie said something different, namely

kraftiekortie wrote:
Some autistic people, especially “high-functioning” people, were diagnosed with “childhood schizophrenia” about 50 years ago. More severely-affected people were diagnosed with “infantile autism.”


Now, you and him can't both be right. Because you are saying it were severely autistic that were diagnosed with childhood schizophrenia, and he is saying it were the milder ones that had that diagnosis. I am not sure who is right though, I am kinda wondering in both directions. What do you guys think?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

27 Apr 2020, 11:10 pm

Infantile autism was a very narrow and definite diagnosis. You had to have all the symptoms. And you probably wouldn’t be diagnosed with it if you talked.

Childhood schizophrenia was considered a vague and broad diagnosis even 50 years ago.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

27 Apr 2020, 11:14 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
There was a concept known as “simple schizophrenia” back in the 1970s in the US.

Supposedly, in “simple schizophrenia,” there was a noticeable absence of “positive” symptoms such as delusions and hallucinations, combined with a noticeable presence of “negative” symptoms such as apathy, “poverty of ideas,” and flat affect. One could say that a “simple” schizophrenic would be “sluggish.”

.”


I could be wrong, but I am pretty sure that in the Soviet concept of "sluggish schizophrenia" it was the condition that was "sluggish", and not the person. The schizophrenia progressed at a sluggish pace compared to that of your typical psychotic who might just obviously loose their sanity over night.

In fact...the schizophrenia of the patients involved was SO sluggish in its progression that....the person would die of natural old age long before they got to the finish line (the finish line being actually manifesting insanity)....because it wasn't real schizophrenia to begin with because the patients were actually sane political prisoners .Lol!

In other words "the guy looks sane now, but trust me, he is slowly going bonkers. So we will call his condition 'sluggish insanity'".


The same can be said about people with Schizotypal Personality Disorder diagnosis today. It is "theorised" that it is a milder version of schizophrenia and some of them will go on to develop it, but in actuality there are plenty of schizotypals that never develop schizophrenia. The diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder is based on "odd beliefs that don't fit cultural norms", and the diagnosis of "sluggish schizophrenia" is probably similar -- except that odd believes includes (but by no means limitted to) odd political beliefs.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

27 Apr 2020, 11:16 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Infantile autism was a very narrow and definite diagnosis. You had to have all the symptoms. And you probably wouldn’t be diagnosed with it if you talked.

Childhood schizophrenia was considered a vague and broad diagnosis even 50 years ago.


Maybe that is what happened: Schizophrenia diagnosis narrowed down, while autism diagnosis broadened up? If both were narrow, then Asperger won't fit into either. But if one is narrow the other is broad, then Asperger would fit into whichever one that is broad. So since schizophrenia was broad in the past while autism is broad nowdays, thats why Asperger "travelled" from schizophrenia to autism.



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

27 Apr 2020, 11:20 pm

Asperger’s Syndrome never was associated with schizophrenia.

Schizotypal Personality Disorder could be said to be more a “neurosis”—whereas full schizophrenia is a psychosis.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

27 Apr 2020, 11:24 pm

kraftiekortie wrote:
Asperger’s Syndrome never was associated with schizophrenia.


But weren't you saying that the milder autism was associated with schizophrenia? If so, wouldn't Asperger be included in that?

kraftiekortie wrote:
Schizotypal Personality Disorder could be said to be more a “neurosis”—whereas full schizophrenia is a psychosis.


I thought neurosis would be things like OCD.

I was always assuming that neurosis and psychosis are "different directions" as opposed to different levels of severity. So if schizotypal is in the "schizophrenia direction" as opposed to "OCD direction" then it can't be classified as neurosis.

Or am I misunderstanding something?



kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

27 Apr 2020, 11:39 pm

There was no “milder” autism in the 1970s.

Asperger’s Syndrome was theorized in the 1980s, based upon a rediscovery of the papers of Hans Asperger, who called it “autistic psychopathy” in the 1940s. “Psychopathy,” to Asperger, had nothing to do with modern-day psychopathy/sociopathy. Then, it was made a diagnosis in the 1990s.

OCD and Schizotypal Personality Disorder are in a similar category. Both are “neuroses,” which are almost always considered less severe than psychoses like schizophrenia.

“Childhood Schizophrenia” was not autism, though some with a severe case of it might fit the diagnostic criteria for infantile autism. The less severe cases were never considered autism at all, not even of a mild variety.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

28 Apr 2020, 12:25 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
There was no “milder” autism in the 1970s.

Asperger’s Syndrome was theorized in the 1980s, based upon a rediscovery of the papers of Hans Asperger, who called it “autistic psychopathy” in the 1940s. “Psychopathy,” to Asperger, had nothing to do with modern-day psychopathy/sociopathy. Then, it was made a diagnosis in the 1990s.

OCD and Schizotypal Personality Disorder are in a similar category. Both are “neuroses,” which are almost always considered less severe than psychoses like schizophrenia.

“Childhood Schizophrenia” was not autism, though some with a severe case of it might fit the diagnostic criteria for infantile autism. The less severe cases were never considered autism at all, not even of a mild variety.


I was trying to compare today's terminology to the terminology back then. Thats why I wanted to take people diagnosed with childhood schizophrenia back then -- and see how would they be diagnosed today. So do you think any of them would receive Asperger diagnosis today?



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

28 Apr 2020, 12:40 am

QFT wrote:

By the way, to give Soviets credit, if you go to this page ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobotomy ) soviets were the FIRST to abandone lobotomy. In fact in Soviet Union lobotomy existed for only few years while in America it existed for few decades. But if you are going to just ignore the rest of the world and talk JUST about Soviet Union then you would be like "oh wow, thats how cruel Stalin was!" But if you look at all countries side by side, you find that it has nothing to do with it and, in fact, Soviets were the last to adopt it and the first to reject it.


I don't think so, Tim.
The Soviet Union was a repressive society.
And still is, unter Putin.

Quote:
It is considered a prime example of the political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union.[9]

Sluggish schizophrenia was the most infamous of diagnoses used by Soviet psychiatrists, due to its usage against political dissidents.[10] After being discharged from a hospital, persons diagnosed with sluggish schizophrenia were deprived of their civic rights, credibility and employability.[11] The usage of this diagnosis has been internationally condemned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sluggish_schizophrenia



auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,579
Location: the island of defective toy santas

28 Apr 2020, 1:01 am

QFT wrote:
And also don't forget how, in the past, autistics were massively misdiagnosed as schizophrenics.

in the 60s, i was dx'ed by the kid shrinks as either schizoid or schizotypal [depending on the shrink]. didn't get the AS dx 'til 2003.



QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

28 Apr 2020, 2:37 am

Pepe wrote:
I don't think so, Tim.


My name is not Tim. Where did you get an idea that it was? Were you confusing me with somebody?

Pepe wrote:
The Soviet Union was a repressive society.
And still is, unter Putin.


I didn't say that it wasn't. But a repressive society doesn't need to invent a label that isn't being used elsewhere. It can take the well known label and use it for its own means. In particular, the fact that the label "sluggish schizophrenia" has been USED by the Soviets to suppress political opposition doesn't negate the fact that this exact label exists throughout the rest of the world (in the form of its synonyms) it just isn't being misused in this particular way.

P.S. I just noticed you said "I don't think so" in reference to my quote that soviets were the first ones to abandone lobotomy. Well, once again, the fact that they were repressive doesn't negate the fact that they might have some good sides (like being the first ones to abandone lobotomy). Don't negate factual information based on your general impression.



Last edited by QFT on 28 Apr 2020, 2:43 am, edited 1 time in total.

QFT
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Jun 2019
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,456

28 Apr 2020, 2:39 am

auntblabby wrote:
QFT wrote:
And also don't forget how, in the past, autistics were massively misdiagnosed as schizophrenics.

in the 60s, i was dx'ed by the kid shrinks as either schizoid or schizotypal [depending on the shrink]. didn't get the AS dx 'til 2003.


I meant some, not all.



Pepe
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 26,635
Location: Australia

28 Apr 2020, 2:58 am

QFT wrote:
Pepe wrote:
I don't think so, Tim.


My name is not Tim. Where did you get an idea that it was? Were you confusing me with somebody?




kraftiekortie
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Feb 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 87,510
Location: Queens, NYC

28 Apr 2020, 5:06 am

I doubt that many of today’s Aspergians would have been diagnosed as having “childhood schizophrenia” during the 1960s.

They would have been thought of as being “eggheads,” “poindexters,” etc. They probably would have been bullied, but rarely diagnosed with a mental or developmental disorder.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 70
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

28 Apr 2020, 5:55 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I doubt that many of today’s Aspergians would have been diagnosed as having “childhood schizophrenia” during the 1960s.

They would have been thought of as being “eggheads,” “poindexters,” etc. They probably would have been bullied, but rarely diagnosed with a mental or developmental disorder.


Exactly. I am the perfect example of that.

I was the textbook "little professor" (as described by Hans Asperger) when I was a child in the Sixties. Though they sent me to shrinks back then none of the shrinks labeled me as schizophrenic.

Also none of them labeled me as autistic either. AFAIK I didn't have any kind of medical label back then.

Back then the autism label was only applied to the most severely autistic children- folks who today would be classified as "low functioning", or as "level three autistic".

I was finally actually officially dxed as having aspergers (therefore on the spectrum) as a middle aged adult in the 21st century, but that was after 1994 when they officially expanded autism into being thought of as a "spectrum" that included the modern bigger range of people.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,376
Location: Long Island, New York

28 Apr 2020, 9:36 am

kraftiekortie wrote:
I doubt that many of today’s Aspergians would have been diagnosed as having “childhood schizophrenia” during the 1960s.

They would have been thought of as being “eggheads,” “poindexters,” etc. They probably would have been bullied, but rarely diagnosed with a mental or developmental disorder.

Either they would not be diagnosed or misdiagnosed with labels such as spastic, mood disorders, neurotic, hysteria for girls etc.
Most conditions had to be “severe” for one to seek help because there was such a stigma around that. The idea was that everybody has problems you should not burden others with yours. Even as late as the 70s if you went for help it meant that people thought you were “batshit crazy” or that you were rich with too much time on your hands like characters in a Woody Allen film

In the 60s and 70s “high functioning”/“mild” people such as Darryl Hannah and Courtney Love were diagnosed with Autism but it was not common. Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia were conflated back in the day.
Cold parenting? Childhood schizophrenia? How the diagnosis of autism has evolved over time
Quote:
Autism was originally described as a form of childhood schizophrenia and the result of cold parenting, then as a set of related developmental disorders, and finally as a spectrum condition with wide-ranging degrees of impairment. Along with these shifting views, its diagnostic criteria have changed as well.

When Leo Kanner, an Austrian-American psychiatrist and physician, first described autism in 1943, he wrote about children with “extreme autistic aloneness,” “delayed echolalia” and an “anxiously obsessive desire for the maintenance of sameness.” He also noted that the children were often intelligent and some had extraordinary memory.

As a result, Kanner viewed autism as a profound emotional disturbance that does not affect cognition. In keeping with his perspective, the second edition of the DSM, the DSM-II, published in 1952, defined autism as a psychiatric condition—a form of childhood schizophrenia marked by a detachment from reality

Understandings change, manuals change but you will always get professionals that disagree with the changes in thinking so the implementation of changed thinking is often inconsistent and lags behind.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman