What do you think of Nietzsche?
Fixed it for you.
It has been 20 years or so since I read anything of his, but I liked him.
The superman concept was really powerful for me. It was twisted by the Nazis. At its core what it means is we all want to transcend our culture and birth circumstances. In other words, a "superman" would be someone that would be admired & studied by all people from many cultures and times, not just our own culture and time.
I don't have time for philosophy anymore. I did read Ayn Rand when I was 17 but she's full of crap. I started seeing her as full of it when I looked up the origin of the US dollar symbol. In the book she claimed (or her character) that the dollar system came from combining the U and S in US. Its not true.
A lot of Eastern European writers/thinkers were so tainted by their experience in the Eastern bloc that to them, everything is communism. If you read right wing/libertarian thinkers, they tend to give you the impression that without communism, Russia would have been a normal country. The reality is Russia has been a brutal authoritarian state whether it was run by Tsars, Communists, or Putin. The Tsars treated the serfs about the same way as the Communists treated the masses.
Regarding libertarianism in general, libertarianism in its current form came about mainly due to opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Barry Goldwater argued he wasn't racist, he just wanted "freedom of association." Libertarianism has a sinister history in the US.
The libertarians at the time did a complete hit job on John Maynard Keynes. They perfected the character assassination tactics that is now common place on Fox News. Because his wife never had kids, they implied he was a homosexual. Oh, she had two miscarriages.
The reason we remember Keynes as "in the long run, we are all dead" is a complete hitjob.
The full context of the quote was roughly "you can make whatever predictions you want about the long run, but you will never be around to see if they are correct because in the long run, we are all dead."
Yet it got twisted into "Keynes doesn't care about the long run."
I went to Auburn which has the Mises Institute and I spent a lot of time hanging around those types. They are a nutty bunch not worthy of your time. The joke in my graduate program was, "if you can't do math, you become an Austrian economist."
He may have written some books in one language and others in a different language. He may have translated them himself. I guess that is possible.
Yes, I read it in the original version. And parts of it were quite hard to understand. I looked at english translations of some parts of the book, and the translations aren't that bad.
E.g. this part about the state:
https://www.bartleby.com/library/prose/3804.html
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,444
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
I totally agree, but he’s still easier to read than Kirkegaarde… just my opinion.
There is the thing were the Nazis adopted it as their own and came up with their own interpretations.
His sister who inherited the rights to his writings was either pro nazi or anti nazi. I forget.
I think it is interesting that he went insane at a rather young age. I kinda like Albert Camus who was French and died at a young age in a car crash in 1940+\-. Nietzche is pre 1900. He is famous for saying “God is Dead” and stuff like that.
It is interesting. I pick and choose ideas rather than look for a system to run my life by. I think he had some good analogies on the same level as the “prisoners in the cave that have only seen shadows”. I guess that is Greek.
To sum it up with Nietzsche in the prevalent pop culture, you have both a nazi “super menche” vibe and a “god is dead” vibe coupled with the fact he went crazy.
-His sister was pro-nazi.
-It is said she altered his work to align it with the NAZI narrative.
-He contracted syphilis and became"insane" because of it and died early as a result, IIRC.
So, what parts of his philosophy were perverted by his sister and the NAZIS, I wonder.
Sounds horrible to me, even it it was correct that life was "nothing more nor less than exploitation." And I don't think it is. You've only got to lay off the exploitation for a minute and you've put a hole in that particular sweeping assertion. I think when a person completely swallows the idea that life is a competitive jungle and that their role is to rip off or to be ripped off, they become part of the problem.
You forget:
The foundation of all societies is built on the platform of corruption.
So did the NAZIS.
AngelRho
Veteran
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,366
Location: The Landmass between N.O. and Mobile
So did the NAZIS.
Wanting to advance humanity is not a sin. The idea of an advanced race or society of human beings is the whole point of higher education.
The interesting thing about the Nazis is that while what they were doing was wrong, there’s not a country in the world who would have ever stood in their way. You have to wonder if Hitler would have succeeded in achieving a 1000 year Reich if he hadn’t screwed up foreign policy so badly.
Sounds horrible to me, even it it was correct that life was "nothing more nor less than exploitation." And I don't think it is. You've only got to lay off the exploitation for a minute and you've put a hole in that particular sweeping assertion. I think when a person completely swallows the idea that life is a competitive jungle and that their role is to rip off or to be ripped off, they become part of the problem.
You forget:
The foundation of all societies is built on the platform of corruption.
Sez you. I'm well aware there's a lot of people who are as bent as the proverbial nine-bob note. Doesn't mean I have to become one of them.
Sounds horrible to me, even it it was correct that life was "nothing more nor less than exploitation." And I don't think it is. You've only got to lay off the exploitation for a minute and you've put a hole in that particular sweeping assertion. I think when a person completely swallows the idea that life is a competitive jungle and that their role is to rip off or to be ripped off, they become part of the problem.
You forget:
The foundation of all societies is built on the platform of corruption.
Sez you. I'm well aware there's a lot of people who are as bent as the proverbial nine-bob note. Doesn't mean I have to become one of them.
You do know that there is indeed a dark "underground" power group covertly controlling "social evolution", right?
I don't intend to elaborate, here.
It has NEVER been fruitful in the past.
Perhaps in another thread.
The superman concept was really powerful for me. It was twisted by the Nazis. At its core what it means is we all want to transcend our culture and birth circumstances. In other words, a "superman" would be someone that would be admired & studied by all people from many cultures and times, not just our own culture and time.
I don't have time for philosophy anymore. I did read Ayn Rand when I was 17 but she's full of crap. I started seeing her as full of it when I looked up the origin of the US dollar symbol. In the book she claimed (or her character) that the dollar system came from combining the U and S in US. Its not true.
A lot of Eastern European writers/thinkers were so tainted by their experience in the Eastern bloc that to them, everything is communism. If you read right wing/libertarian thinkers, they tend to give you the impression that without communism, Russia would have been a normal country. The reality is Russia has been a brutal authoritarian state whether it was run by Tsars, Communists, or Putin. The Tsars treated the serfs about the same way as the Communists treated the masses.
Regarding libertarianism in general, libertarianism in its current form came about mainly due to opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Barry Goldwater argued he wasn't racist, he just wanted "freedom of association." Libertarianism has a sinister history in the US.
The libertarians at the time did a complete hit job on John Maynard Keynes. They perfected the character assassination tactics that is now common place on Fox News. Because his wife never had kids, they implied he was a homosexual. Oh, she had two miscarriages.
The reason we remember Keynes as "in the long run, we are all dead" is a complete hitjob.
The full context of the quote was roughly "you can make whatever predictions you want about the long run, but you will never be around to see if they are correct because in the long run, we are all dead."
Yet it got twisted into "Keynes doesn't care about the long run."
I went to Auburn which has the Mises Institute and I spent a lot of time hanging around those types. They are a nutty bunch not worthy of your time. The joke in my graduate program was, "if you can't do math, you become an Austrian economist."
Obviously you have no idea what libertarianism is. America is founded on libertarian (classical liberal) ideals, maybe America is sinister to you altogether. Yes the "problem" with Keynes was that he was supposedly homosexual, not that his entire work is pseudoscience, and his approach is largelly abandoned basically everywhere. You have an opinion about libertarians, intersesting.
Last edited by Cornflake on 21 Feb 2023, 10:35 am, edited 1 time in total.: De-fanged a potentially misunderstood comment
No, and I doubt you do either.
It has NEVER been fruitful in the past.
Perhaps in another thread.
Good luck with that.
Not everything by Nietzsche is written that way. Beyond Good and Evil is written in a more straightforward prose style than some of his other writings.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)